Survival and Success of ITI Implants and Prostheses: Retrospective Study of Cases with 5-Year Follow-Up

Bilge Gokcen-Rohlig; Mehmet Yaltirik; Senem Ozer; Ebru Demet Tuncer; Gulumser Evlioglu

doi:10.1055/s-0039-1697404

European Journal of Dentistry, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2009; 03(01): 42-49
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697404

Original Article

Dental Investigation Society

Survival and Success of ITI Implants and Prostheses: Retrospective Study of Cases with 5-Year Follow-Up

Authors

Bilge Gokcen-Rohlig

^aDepartment of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Turkey
Mehmet Yaltirik

^bDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Turkey
Senem Ozer

^bDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Turkey
Ebru Demet Tuncer

^aDepartment of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Turkey
Gulumser Evlioglu

^aDepartment of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Turkey

Abstract

PDF Download

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The use of osseointegrated implants as an endoestal anchorage device to provide support for dental prostheses is a reliable and widely accepted treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of non-submerged implants placed in the maxilla or in the mandible.

Methods: A total of 146 International Team for Implantology (ITI) (Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland) implants were placed in 42 patients (20 women, 22 men, mean age 42). The cases were examined retrospectively in order to evaluate the clinical efficiency of non-submerged ITI implants and to determine the success rate of implant retained/supported prosthesis after a 5-year period. All implants were assessed clinically and radiographically on a yearly basis.

Results: The 5-year cumulative success rates for maxillary and mandibular implants were 91.00% and 97.81%, respectively. The most common prosthetic complication was abutment accompanied by screw loosing (3.42%). Veneering material fracture was documented in only one patient.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of the observation period and sample number, the present findings confirmed sufficient success and survival rates of ITI implants placed in mandible as well as implants placed in the maxilla after a 5-year period. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:42-49)

Key words:

Cumulative success rate - Maxillary implants - Mandibular implants - Dental prosthesis

PDF (181 kb)

References

REFERENCES
1 Branemark PI, Breine U, AdeLL R, Hannsson BO, Lindström J, Öhman A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 11: 81-100
2 Branemark PI, Hannsson B, AdeLL R, Breine U, Lindström J, Öhman A. Osseointegrated impLants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10 year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 11: 1-132
3 Schroeder A, Pohler O, Sutter F. Gewebereaktion aufein Titan-HohLzyLinderimpLantat mit Titan SpritzschichtoberfLache. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 1976; 86: 713-727
4 Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981; 9: 15-35
5 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rocler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10: 387-416
6 Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347-359
7 Belser UC, Schmid B, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 30-42
8 Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberge D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 381-389
9 Attart NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant overdentures: the Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 425-433
10 Toljanic JA, Eckert SE, Roumanas E, Beumer J, Huryn JM, Zlotolow IM, Reisberg DJ, Habakuk SW, Wright RF, Rubenstein JE, Schneid TR, Mullasseril P, Garcia LT, Bedard JF, Choi YG. Osseointegrated craniofacial implants in the rehabilitation of orbital defects: an update of a retrospective experience in the United States. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 177-182
11 Shapiro PA, Kokich VG. Uses of implants in orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1988; 32: 539-555
12 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated implants Toronto study. Part 1: Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 451-457
13 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6: 180-188
14 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in posterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6: 189-196
15 Ferrigoni N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G. A longterm follow-up of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 260-273
16 Astrand P, Ahlqvist J, Gunne J, Nilson H. Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: A 20-Year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10: 207-217
17 Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 631-638
18 Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Long-term clinical effectiveness of oral implants in the treatment of partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 133-143
19 Wedgwood D, Jennings KJ, Critchlow HA, Watkinson AC, Shepherd JP, Frame JW, Laird WRE, Quatle AA. Experience with ITI osseointegrated implants at five centers in UK. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 30: 377-381
20 Behneke A, Behneke N, d’Hoedt B, Wagner W. Hard and soft tissue reactions to ITI screw implants: a 3 year longitudinal results of a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 749-757
21 Brägger U, Huge-Pisoni C, Bürgin W, Buser D, Lang NP. Correlations between radiographic, clinical and mobility parameters after loading of oral implants with fixed partial dentures. A 2-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 230-239
22 Ellegaard B, Baelum V, Karring T. Implant therapy in periodontally compromised patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 180-188
23 Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 80-90
24 van Steenberghe D, Bolender C, Henry P, Higuchi K, Linden U. The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 272-281
25 Branemark PI. Introduction to osseointegration. In Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. (eds) Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1985
26 Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of nonsubmerged implants One-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-screw and hollow-cylinder implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990; 1: 33-40
27 Buser D, Maeglin B. Surgical procedures with ITI implants. In Schroeder A, Sutter F, Buser D, Krekeler G. (eds) Oral Implantology. New York: Thieme Publishers Inc; 1996: 256-329
28 Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: clinical-histomorphomometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 1-7
29 Buser D, Weber HP, Braegger U. The treatment of partially edentulous patients with ITI hollow-screw implants; presurgical evaluation and surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 165-174
30 Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Disease 1958; 6: 699-712
31 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long term evaluation of nonsubmerged ITI implants Part 1: 8-year life-table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 161-172
32 Arlin ML. Survival and success of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a retrospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2007; 73: 821
33 Schnitmann PA, Schulman LB. Recommendation of the consensus development conference on dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 98: 373-377
34 Albrektsson T, Zarb D, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25
35 Weber HP, Crohin CC, Fiorellini JP. A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 144-153
36 Simion M, Misitano U, Gionso L, Salvato A. Treatment of dehiscences and fenestrations around dental implants using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes associated with bone autografts: a comparative clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 159-167
37 Jensen OT, Schulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 11-45