J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36(02): 110-115
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697903
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Classification and Management of Donor-Site Wound Complications in the Profunda Artery Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction

Min-Jeong Cho*
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Sumeet S. Teotia*
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Nicholas T. Haddock
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

05. April 2019

20. August 2019

Publikationsdatum:
26. September 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap breast reconstruction has emerged as a popular choice for patients who are not optimal candidates for autologous breast reconstruction using abdominal-based techniques such as the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Despite increased utilization of PAP flaps, there are no previous studies on the donor-site morbidity. In this study, we present risk factors, classification of thigh wounds, and our management of donor-site wounds.

Methods Retrospective review of 69 patients who underwent PAP flap from 2013 to 2016 was performed. Demographic, patient characteristic, and flap data were collected. Postoperative photographs of donor sites were reviewed, and the wounds were classified into three types: type I—normal wound, type II—minor scab, and type III—dehiscence.

Results Of the 69 patients (130 flaps), there were 13 patients (17 flaps) with wound dehiscence (13%), 8 patients with cellulitis (8.5%), 2 patients with seroma (3%), and 1 patient with hematoma (1.5%). The patients with wound dehiscence had statistically higher body mass index (BMI) (29.2 vs. 26.5) with p-value < 0.05 than the patients without wound complications. These patients had higher flap weight (514 vs. 439.7 g), were older (50.8 vs. 48.6 years old), and had a higher chance of being a diabetic (6 vs. 2%), but statistical significance was not achieved. The patients with dehiscence were managed with local wound care (63%), wound vacuum (26%), and operative intervention (11%).

Conclusion Our study shows that BMI plays a significant role in the development of postoperative thigh wounds, and all wounds occurred at the medial thigh. However, the majority of the study population did not require any intervention, and revision of scar using the posterior thigh advancement flaps can be used to improve the gluteal aesthetics. We believe findings from our study can help plastic surgeons to counsel and assist patients who will undergo breast reconstruction with a PAP flap.

* These authors contributed equally to this work.


 
  • References

  • 1 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (01) 32-38
  • 2 Chevray PM. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (05) 1077-1083 , discussion 1084–1085
  • 3 Arnez ZM, Pogorelec D, Planinsek F, Ahcan U. Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57 (01) 20-26
  • 4 Opsomer D, Stillaert F, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K. The lumbar artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction: initial experience with 100 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (01) 1e-8e
  • 5 Werdin F, Peek A, Martin NC, Baumeister S. Superior gluteal artery perforator flap in bilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (01) 17-21
  • 6 Ahmadzadeh R, Bergeron L, Tang M, Geddes CR, Morris SF. The posterior thigh perforator flap or profunda femoris artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (01) 194-200 , discussion 201–202
  • 7 Hurwitz DJ, Walton RL. Closure of chronic wounds of the perineal and sacral regions using the gluteal thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg 1982; 8 (05) 375-386
  • 8 Healy C, Allen Sr RJ. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (02) 121-125
  • 9 Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY, Sadeghi A. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 16e-23e
  • 10 Allen Jr RJ, Lee ZH, Mayo JL, Levine J, Ahn C, Allen Sr RJ. The profunda artery perforator flap experience for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (05) 968-975
  • 11 Hunsinger V, Lhuaire M, Haddad K. , et al. Medium- and large-sized autologous breast reconstruction using a fleur-de-lysprofunda femoris artery perforator flap design: areport comparing results with the horizontal profunda femoris artery perforator flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 8-14
  • 12 Hupkens P, Hameeteman M, Westland PB, Slater NJ, Vasilic D, Ulrich DJ. Breast reconstruction using the geometrically modified profunda artery perforator flap from the posteromedial thigh region: combining the benefits of its predecessors. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77 (04) 438-444
  • 13 Ciudad P, Maruccia M, Orfaniotis G. , et al. The combined transverse upper gracilis and profunda artery perforator (TUGPAP) flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (05) 359-366
  • 14 Haddock NT, Greaney P, Otterburn D, Levine S, Allen RJ. Predicting perforator location on preoperative imaging for the profunda artery perforator flap. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (07) 507-511
  • 15 Haddock NT, Cho MJ, Gassman A, Teotia S. Stacked profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction in failed or unavailable deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plastic Reconstrc Surg 2019; 143 (03) 488e-494e
  • 16 Haddock N, Nagarkar P, Teotia SS. Versatility of the profunda artery perforator flap: creative uses in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 606e-612e
  • 17 Wong C, Nagarkar P, Teotia S, Haddock NT. The profunda artery perforator flap: investigating the perforasome using three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (05) 915-919
  • 18 Saad A, Sadeghi A, Allen RJ. The anatomic basis of the profunda femoris artery perforator flap: a new option for autologous breast reconstruction--a cadaveric and computer tomography angiogram study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (06) 381-386
  • 19 Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC, Kanchwala S. Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: analysis of 15,937 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217 (04) 656-664
  • 20 Wagner IJ, Szpalski C, Allen Jr RJ. , et al. Obesity impairs wound closure through a vasculogenic mechanism. Wound Repair Regen 2012; 20 (04) 512-522
  • 21 Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Sieber B. , et al. Free tissue transfer in the obese patient: an outcome and cost analysis in 1258 consecutive abdominally based reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 681e-692e
  • 22 Ryan JJ. The lower thoracic advancement technique in breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1984; 11 (02) 277-286
  • 23 Ryan JJ. A lower thoracic advancement flap in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 70 (02) 153-160