Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2007; 01(04): 246-250
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698347
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Value of Computed Tomography (CT) in Imaging the Morbidity of Submerged Molars: A Case Report

Zuhal Kırzıoğlu
a   Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics Isparta/Türkiye
,
Hüseyin Karayılmaz
b   Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Isparta/Türkiye
,
Bahattin Baykal
c   Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Isparta/Türkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Submerged primary molars can be difficult to manage due to the developing dentition. Rarely in some severe cases, may the surgical interventions be required while ensuring the vital structures are protected. Therefore these cases require sophisticated imaging techniques in order to locate the vital structures

In this case report, a 17 year old girl who had a retained and submerged deciduous molar which caused impaction of the second premolar and tipping of the first molar was presented. In addition, value of computed tomography (CT) for locating the vital anatomic structures was discussed

In our case, CT has been supplied effective information about localization of the vital structures and amount of bone volume during the diagnosis and treatment planning period in addition to the routine dental radiographies. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:246-250)

Key words

Submerged molars - Ankylosis - Impaction - Computed tomography
 

  • References

  • 1 Kitai N, Fujii Y, Murakami S, Takada K. Three-dimensional evaluation of rare case with multiple impacted teeth using CT. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003; 27: 117-121.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chen HS, Lieu JD. An unusual primary first molar impaction associated with a supernumerary tooth.Case report. Aust Dent J 1993; 38: 277-279.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Douglass J, Jaeggi T, Tinanoff N. The etiology, prevalence, and sequelae of infrooclusion of primary molars. J Dent Child 1991; 58: 481-483.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Suri L, Gagari E, Vastardis H. Delayed tooth eruption: Pathogenesis diagnosis and treatment.A literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 432-445.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Frank CA. Treatment options for impacted teeth. JADA 2000; 131: 623-632.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cobourne MT, Brown JE, McDonald F. Analysis of the morbidity of submerged deciduous molars: The use of imaging techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 098-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nasel CJO, Pretterlieber M, Gahleitner A. Osteometry of the mandible performed using dental MR imaging. Am J Neuroradioliol 1999; 20: 1221-1227.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Freisfeld MH, Dahl IA, Jager A, Dresher D, Schuller H. X-ray diagnosis of impacted upper canines in panoramic radiographs and computed tomographs. J Orofac Orthop 1999; 60: 177-184.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Preda L, La AFianza, Di EMMaggio. The use spiral computed tomography in the localization of impacted maxillary canines. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 236-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Krenmair G, Lenglinger FX, Traxler M. Imaging of unerupted and displaced teeth by cross-sectional CT scans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 24: 413-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schmuth GP, Freisfeld M, Koster O, Schuller H. The application of computerized tomography (CT) in cases of impacted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 296-301.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Computed tomography. (2007, September 6). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 09:43, September 7,2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Computed_tomography&oldid=156062111 0
  • 13 Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 951-957
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schulze C. Developmental abnormalities of the teeth and jaws. In: Gorlin RJ and Goldman HM (ed.) Thoma’s Oral Pathology. St. Louis: Mosby Company; 1970: 152-153
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Ltyle JJ. Indications and contrindications for removal of the impacted tooth. Dent Clin North Am 1979; 23: 333-336
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Altay N, Cengiz SB. Space-regaining treatment for a submerged primary molar: A case report. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12: 286-289
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Wise GE, Frazier SBowers, D’Souza RN. Cellular, molecular and genetic determinants of tooth eruption. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002; 13: 323-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Aitasalo K, Lehtinen R, Oksala E. An orthopantomographic study of prevalence of impacted teeth. Int J Oral Surg 1972; 01: 117-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey 3874 routine full-mouth radiographs. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg 1961; 14: 1165-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sato K, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Kawamura H. Use of selectively colored stereolithography for diagnosis of impacted supernumerary teeth for a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998; 13: 163-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kreiborg S, Jensen BL, Larsen P, Schleidt DT. Darvann T. Anomalies of craniofacial skeleton and teeth in cleidocranial dysplasia. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1999; 19: 75-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Abrahms JJ. Dental implants and multiplanar imaging of the jaw . In: Som PM, Curtin HD (ed.). Head and neck imaging. 1996. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1996: 350-74
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Babu V, Nagesh KS, Diwakar NR. A rare case of hereditary multiple impacted normal and supernumerary teeth. Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 23: 059-061
    Google Scholar