ABSTRACT
Objectives: Objective: To evaluate the effect of thermo-mechanical cycling (TMC) on
the microleakage (μL) and axial gap width (AG) of Class V bonded restorations in premolars
using self-etching adhesive systems. The bond strength of composite restorations to
dentin (μTBS) using the same adhesives was also evaluated in third molars after water
storage: 24 h and 6 months. The research hypotheses were tested for the results of
two self-etching adhesives in comparison when a conventional two-step adhesive was
used: (1) the μL and AG would be lower, regardless of TMC; (2) the μTBS of self-etching
adhesives would be higher, irrespective of evaluation times.
Methods: Sixty Class V composite restorations were made in 30 premolars and bonded
with Adper Single Bond 2 (ASB2), AdheSE (ASE), and Adper Prompt L-Pop (APL-P) (n=20).
Dentin μL and AG were immediately measured for half of the sample. The other half
was evaluated after TMC. Eighteen third molars were also selected and bonded using
the same adhesives to test the μTBS to dentin. Specimens were evaluated after 24 h
and 6 months of water storage.
Results: No differences in μL and AG were found among the groups (P>.05). The μTBS
mean values were: ASB2>ASE>APL-P (P<.05); only Adper Single Bond 2 presented a significantly
lower μTBS after water storage (P<.05)
Conclusions: The bonding approach does not influence the microleakage and interfacial
gap extension. Despite the decrease in the mean values, the bond strength to dentin
of the conventional, two-step adhesive remains high after 6 months of water storage.
(Eur J Dent 2012;6:169-177)
Key words
Dentin-bonding agents - bond strength - durability - microleakage