CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2012; 06(03): 340-345
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698971
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

The genetic basis of facial skeletal characteristics and its relation with orthodontics

Derya Germec Cakan
1   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, TURKIYE
,
Feyza Ulkur
1   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, TURKIYE
,
Tulin Uğur Taner
2   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TURKIYE
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
09. März 2020 (online)

ABSTRACT

Successful treatment of any orthodontic problem depends on an appropriate diagnosis of its etiology. It is well known that the genetics, as well as environmental factors, play an important role on the etiology of skeletal anomalies. Recent studies and advances in genetic sciences allowed the orthodontists to better understand the effects of genetics on the etiology of dentofacial characteristics and pathologies which in turn supported the effects of the genes in the development of dentofacial complex. In orthodontic practice, the genetic basis of a skeletal anomaly should also be considered during the diagnosis. Therefore orthodontic treatment plan should be chosen accordingly. However, further genetic studies are required to clearly determine all the specific genes leading to a particular skeletal variability caused by the polygenic nature of craniofacial traits. This article includes the current information on the association between orthodontics and genetics, an outline of the evidence based impact of heredity on dentofacial development as a review of the etiological factors of skeletal anomalies from the genetic point of view. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:340-345)

 
  • References

  • 1 Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S. Orthodontic literature: An overview of the last 2 decades. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:30-40.
  • 2 Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1994,19.
  • 3 Baker CR. Similarity of malocclusion in families. Int J Orthod 1924;10:459-462.
  • 4 Korkhaus G. Anthropologic and odontologic studies of twins. Int J Orthodont 1930;16:640-647.
  • 5 Markovic MD. At the cross-roads of orofacial genetics. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:469-481.
  • 6 Galton F. The history of twins as a criterion of the relative powers of nature and nurture. J Anthrop Inst 1875;5:391-406.
  • 7 Vlietinck RF. Determination of the zygosity of twins. [Master thesis]. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University of Leuven, 1986.
  • 8 Horowitz SL, Osborne RH, DeGeorge FV. A cephalometric study of craniofacial variation in adult twins. Angle Orthod 1960;30:1-5.
  • 9 Corruccini RS. Genetic analysis of occlusal variation in twins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1980;78:140-154.
  • 10 Sognnaes RF, Rawson RD, Gratt BM, Nguyen NBT. Computer comparison of bitemark patterns in identical twins. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;105:449-451.
  • 11 Lundström A. Nature vs nurture in dentofacial variation. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:77-91.
  • 12 Corruccini RS, Sharma K, Potter RHY. Comparative genetic variance and heritability of dental occlusal variables in U.S. and northwest Indian twins. Am J Phys Anthropol 1986;70:293-299.
  • 13 Corruccini RS, Townsend GC, Richards LC, Brown T. Genetic and environmental determinants of dental occlusal variation in twins of different nationalities. Human Biol 1990;62:353-367.
  • 14 Ngan DC, Kharbanda Dp, Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. The genetic contribution to orthodontic root resorbtion: a retrospective twin study. Aust Orthod J 2004;20:1-9.
  • 15 Carels C. Genetics and the dento-facial complex. Orthod F. 2006;77:79-84.
  • 16 Manfredi C, Martina R, Grossi G B, Giuliani M. Heritability of 39 orthodontic cephalometric parameters on MZ, DZ twins and MN-paired singletons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:44-51.
  • 17 Harris EF, Johnson MG. Heritability of craniometric and occlusal variables: A longitudinal sib analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:258-268.
  • 18 Cassidy K, Harris EF, Tolley EA, Keim RG. Genetic influence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1998;68:445-454.
  • 19 Susanne C. Genetic and environmental influences on morphological characteristics. Ann Hum Biol 1975;2:279-288.
  • 20 Harris JE, Kowalski CJ. All in the family: use of familial information in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1976;69:493-510.
  • 21 Saunders SR, Popovich F, Thompson GW. A family study of craniofacial dimensions in the Burlington Growth Centre sample. Am J Orthod 1980;78:394-403.
  • 22 Jena AK, Duggal R, Mathur VP, Parkhash H. Class-III malocclusion: Genetics or environment? A twins study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005;23:27-30.
  • 23 Devor EJ. Transmission of human craniofacial dimensions. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1987;7:95-106.
  • 24 Curtner RM. Predetermination of the adult face. Am J Orthod 1953;39:201-217.
  • 25 Hunter WS. A study of the inheritance of craniofacial characteristics as seen in lateral cephalograms of 72 like sexed twins. European Orthodontic Society Report of Congress 1970;41:59-70.
  • 26 Savoye I, Loos R, Carels C, Derom C, Vlietinck R. A genetic study of anteroposterior and vertical facial proportions using model-fitting. Angle Orthod 1998;68:467-470.
  • 27 Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. St.Louis; Mosby: 2000,142.
  • 28 Proffit WR. On the aetiology of malocclusion. Br J Orthod 1986;13:1-11.
  • 29 Rubbrecht O. A study of the heredity of the anomalies of the jaws. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1939;25:751-779.
  • 30 Wolff G, Wienker TF, Sander H. On the genetics of mandibular prognathism: analysis of large European noble families. J Med Genet 1993;30:112-116.
  • 31 Downs WG. Studies in the causes of dental anomalies. J Dent Res 1928;8:267-379.
  • 32 Stiles KA, Luke JE. The inheritance of malocclusion due to mandibular prognathism. J Hered 1953;44:241-245.
  • 33 Litton SF, Ackerman LV, Isaacson RJ, Shapiro B. A genetic study of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1970;58:565-577.
  • 1 34 Suzuki S. Studies so-called reverse occlusion. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent 1962;4:51-58.
  • 35 Schulze C, Weise W. Zur Vererburg der Progenie. Fortschr fte Kieferorthop 1965;26:213-229.
  • 36 Harris JE. Genetic factors in the growth of the head: Inheritance of the craniofacial complex and malocclusion. Dent Clin North Am 1975;19:151-160.
  • 37 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Class II division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern. Angle Orthod 1998;68:9-17.
  • 38 Klein, D. Genetic factors and classification of craniofacial anomalies derived from a perturbation of the first branchial arch. In Longacre, J.J. (editor): Craniofacial anomalies ; pathogenesis and repair. Philadelphia, J.B; Lippincott company: 1968;31-41.
  • 39 Warkany J, Kalter H. Congenital malformations. New Engl J Med 1961;265:993-1001.
  • 40 Cohen M. In Bell WH, Proffit WR, White RP. Surgical correction of dentofacial deformities. Philadelphia; WB Saunders: 1980;23.
  • 41 http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/OM
  • 42 Dixon, MJ. Treacher Collins syndrome. Hum Molec Genet 1996;5:1391-1396.
  • 43 De Coster PJ, De Paw G, Martens L, De Paepe A. Craniofacial structure in Marfan syndrome: a cephalometric study. Am J Med Genet 2004;pp240-248.
  • 44 Westling L, Mohlin B, Bresin A. Craniofacial manifestations in the Marfan syndrome: palatal dimensions and a comparative cephalometric analysis. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1998;18: 211-218.
  • 45 Robinson PN, Godfrey M. The molecular genetics of Marfan syndrome and related microfibrillopathies. J Med Genet 2000;37:9-25.
  • 46 Goriely A, Mc Vean GA, Röjmyr M, Ingemarsson B, Wilkie AOM. Evidence selective advantage of pathogenic FGFR2 mutations in the male germ line. Science 2003;301:606-607.
  • 47 Rutland P, Pulleyn LJ, Reardon W, Baraitser M, Hayward R, Jones B, Malcolm S, Winter RM, Oldridge M, Slaney SF, Poole MD, Wilkie AOM. Identical mutations in the FGFR2 gene cause both Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndrome phenotypes. Nature Genet 1995;9:173-176.
  • 48 Lajeunie E, Ma HW, Bonaventure J, Munnich A, Le Merrer M, Renier D. FGFR2 mutations in Pfeiffer syndrome. (Letter). Nature Genet 1995;9:108.
  • 49 Wilkie AO. Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet 1997;6:1647-1656.
  • 50 Robin NH, Feldman GJ, Mitchell HF, Lorenz P, Wilroy RS, Zackai EH, Allanson JE, Reich EW, Pfeiffer RA, Clarke LA, Warman ML, Mulliken JB, Brueton LA, Winter RM, Price RA, Gasser DL, Muenke M. Linkage of Pfeiffer syndrome to chromosome 8 centromere and evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Hum Molec Genet 1994;3:2153-2158.
  • 51 Taysi K, Marsh JL, Wise DM. Familial hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate J 1983;20:47-53.
  • 52 Murray JC. Face facts: genes, environment, and clefts. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:227-232.
  • 53 Connor, Ferguson S. Essential medical genetics. Oxford; Blackwell, 4th edn: 1993,127.
  • 54 Ardinger HH, Buetow KH, Bell GI, Bardach J, VanDemark DR, Murray JC. Association of genetic variation of the transforming growth factor-alpha gene with cleft lip and palate. Am J Hum Genet 1989;45:348-353.
  • 55 Lidral A, Romitti PA, Bassart AM, Doetschman T, Leysens NJ. Association of MSX1 and TGFB3 with nonsyndromic clefting in humans. Am J Hum Genet 1998;63:557-568.
  • 56 Rollnick BR, Kaye CI. Mendelian inheritance of isolated nonsyndromic cleft palate. Am J Med Genet 1986;24:465-473.