Alterations in Surgically Created Intimal Lesions: An Observation Study in the Aortic Rat Model

Abstract

Background Intimal injury in microvessels due to common risk factors such as atherosclerosis or inadequate manipulation are known to have a major impact on developing thrombosis and eventually vascular obstruction. Understanding of these injuries is therefore of great significance to prevent far-reaching consequences such as flap loss in free tissue transfer. It was the aim of this study to evaluate artificially induced intimal lesions with focus on alteration in size and configuration.

Methods Intimal defects were created surgically in the abdominal aorta of 30 male Wistar rats. After planimetric measurement of the defect sizes, configuration of defects were classified as round, horizontal, or vertical. Seven days postoperatively, the rats underwent a second-look surgery. Finally, the abdominal aorta was harvested, and the endothelial defects were reevaluated concerning size and configuration using a defined pattern.

Results The mean defect size created intraoperatively was 1.68 ± 0.6 mm². The classification of the defects configurations resulted in 43.3% round, 20% horizontal, and 36.7% vertical defects. Reevaluation at 7 days after surgery showed defect shrinkage in 96.7% in total and 42.8% averaging due to reendothelialization. A shift in defect configuration was detected in 56.7%, the strongest being in vertical defect configurations (100%). Vascular occlusion did not occur in any of the specimen.

Conclusion Intimal injuries undergo a fast repair process in terms of size reduction and configuration modification due to reendothelialization. Especially vertical defects, representing a great risk for thrombus formation, convert into lower risk horizontal defect configurations. In high-flow vessels such as the rat aortas, small endothelial damage seems to have no significant impact to produce complete vascular occlusion. Still, all efforts should be made to avoid any kind of intimal injury.

Keywords

microsurgery - intimal injury - reendothelialization - aortic rat model

• References

• 1 Tamai S. History of microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (6, Suppl) e282-e294
• 2 Masia J, Olivares L, Koshima I. , et al. Barcelona consensus on supermicrosurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (01) 53-58
• 3 Koshima I, Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Mihara M, Iida T. Perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (04) 683-689 , vii–iii
• 4 Chen HC, Coskunfirat OK, Ozkan O. , et al. Guidelines for the optimization of microsurgery in atherosclerotic patients. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (05) 356-362
• 5 Suh JD, Sercarz JA, Abemayor E. , et al. Analysis of outcome and complications in 400 cases of microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (08) 962-966
• 6 Petry JJ, French TS, Wortham KA. The effect of the “patency test” on arterial endothelial surface. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (06) 960-964
• 7 Naides A, Noland R, Lu JG, Akelina Y, Marboe C, Strauch RJ. Histological changes in the rat femoral artery following the use of the empty-and-refill test. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (04) 270-276
• 8 Kühnel TS, Müller GH. Experimental animal studies of clip-induced microvascular trauma. Microsurgery 2004; 24 (03) 241-247
• 9 Fujiki M, Miyamoto S, Sakuraba M. Flow-through anastomosis for both the artery and vein in leg free flap transfer. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (07) 536-540
• 10 Muramatsu K, Shigetomi M, Ihara K, Kawai S, Doi K. Vascular complication in free tissue transfer to the leg. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (08) 362-365
• 11 Mücke T, Wolff C, von Düring M, Mitchell DA, Ritschl LM, Fichter AM. Form and size matter: increased risk of thrombosis in microvessels with surgically created endothelial lesions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (01) 40-44
• 12 Ritschl LM, Fichter AM, Häberle S. , et al. Ketamine-xylazine anesthesia in rats: intraperitoneal versus intravenous administration using a microsurgical femoral vein access. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (05) 343-347
• 13 Chow SP. The histopathology of microvascular anastomosis: a study of the incidence of various tissue changes. Microsurgery 1983; 4 (01) 5-9
• 14 Ritschl LM, Fichter AM, von Düring M, Mitchell DA, Wolff KD, Mücke T. Introduction of a microsurgical in-vivo embolization-model in rats: the aorta-filter model. PLoS One 2014; 9 (02) e89947
• 15 Barker JH, Anderson GL, Gu JM, Wyllie F, Acland RD. Experimental study of the relationship between alterations in tissue perfusion and anastomotic patency. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (06) 409-415
• 16 O'Shaughnessy M, Anderson GL, Acland RD, Barker JH. Platelet-derived thromboxane A2 decreases microvascular perfusion after arterial repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (03) 834-841
• 17 Hong X, Margariti A, Le Bras A. , et al. Transdifferentiated human vascular smooth muscle cells are a new potential cell source for endothelial regeneration. Sci Rep 2017; 7 (01) 5590
• 18 Banno K, Yoder MC. Tissue regeneration using endothelial colony-forming cells: promising cells for vascular repair. Pediatr Res 2018; 83 (1,2): 283-290
• 19 Mannarino E, Pirro M. Endothelial injury and repair: a novel theory for atherosclerosis. Angiology 2008; 59 (2, Suppl) 69S-72S
• 20 Foteinos G, Hu Y, Xiao Q, Metzler B, Xu Q. Rapid endothelial turnover in atherosclerosis-prone areas coincides with stem cell repair in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation 2008; 117 (14) 1856-1863
• 21 McDonald AI, Shirali AS, Aragón R. , et al. Endothelial regeneration of large vessels is a biphasic process driven by local cells with distinct proliferative capacities. Cell Stem Cell 2018; 23 (02) 210-225.e6
• 22 Haudenschild CC, Schwartz SM. Endothelial regeneration. II. Restitution of endothelial continuity. Lab Invest 1979; 41 (05) 407-418
• 23 Ross R, Glomset J, Harker L. Response to injury and atherogenesis. Am J Pathol 1977; 86 (03) 675-684
• 24 Xu Q. The impact of progenitor cells in atherosclerosis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2006; 3 (02) 94-101
• 25 Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Vascular repair by circulating endothelial progenitor cells: the missing link in atherosclerosis?. J Mol Med (Berl) 2004; 82 (10) 671-677
• 26 Hu Y, Davison F, Zhang Z, Xu Q. Endothelial replacement and angiogenesis in arteriosclerotic lesions of allografts are contributed by circulating progenitor cells. Circulation 2003; 108 (25) 3122-3127
• 27 Xu Q. Progenitor cells in vascular repair. Curr Opin Lipidol 2007; 18 (05) 534-539
• 28 Schwartz SM, Stemerman MB, Benditt EP. The aortic intima. II. Repair of the aortic lining after mechanical denudation. Am J Pathol 1975; 81 (01) 15-42
• 29 Hirsch EZ, Robertson Jr AL. Selective acute arterial endothelial injury and repair. I. Methodology and surface characteristics. Atherosclerosis 1977; 28 (03) 271-287
• 30 Ramelli E, Durry A, Ruffenach L, Bruant-Rodier C, Bodin F. Decrease of thrombosis in microsurgical anastomoses: the use of intraoperative pure intraluminal unfractionated heparin. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (01) 16-20
• 31 Wolff KD, Hölzle F, Wysluch A, Mücke T, Kesting M. Incidence and time of intraoperative vascular complications in head and neck microsurgery. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (03) 143-146
• 32 Siller-Matula JM, Plasenzotti R, Spiel A, Quehenberger P, Jilma B. Interspecies differences in coagulation profile. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100 (03) 397-404
• 33 Perel P, Roberts I, Sena E. , et al. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 2007; 334 (7586): 197