Semin Reprod Med 2019; 37(05/06): 232-238
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701633
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Fertility Preservation Before Deployment: Oocyte and Sperm Freezing in Members of the Active Duty Military

Anne E. Martini
1   Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
,
Joseph O. Doyle
2   Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 February 2020 (online)

Abstract

Active duty military service and deployment has the potential to compromise fertility through combat-related genitourinary injury, gonadotoxic exposures, and physical separation from a partner. Despite a growing interest among the military community as well as promising efficacy and safety data, fertility preservation remains an uncovered benefit for active duty soldiers. In 2016, the Pentagon proposed a program that would cover oocyte and sperm cryopreservation for any member of the active duty military desiring its use. Regrettably, that funding was not secured and predeployment fertility preservation remains an out-of-pocket expense. Today, advocacy groups, non-for-profit organizations, and physicians remain vigilant in their attempts to drive another government initiative through Congress. While activism continues, it is important to stress the value of fertility preservation counseling in soldiers' predeployment preparation and military family planning.

 
  • References

  • 1 Martinez F. ; International Society for Fertility Preservation–ESHRE–ASRM Expert Working Group. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives. Fertil Steril 2017; 108 (03) 407-415.e11
  • 2 Doyle JO, Richter KS, Lim J, Stillman RJ, Graham JR, Tucker MJ. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval. Fertil Steril 2016; 105 (02) 459-66.e2
  • 3 Cobo A, García-Velasco JA, Coello A, Domingo J, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertil Steril 2016; 105 (03) 755-764.e8
  • 4 García A, Herrero MB, Holzer H, Tulandi T, Chan P. Assisted reproductive outcomes of male cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2015; 9 (02) 208-214
  • 5 Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org. Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018; 110 (03) 380-386
  • 6 Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH. , et al; American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (18) 2917-2931
  • 7 Yang H, Ramstein J, Smith J. Non-oncologic indications for male fertility preservation. Curr Urol Rep 2019; 20 (09) 51
  • 8 Healy MW, Yauger BJ, James AN, Jezior JR, Parker P, Dean RC. Seminal vesicle sperm aspiration from wounded warriors. Fertil Steril 2016; 106 (03) 579-583
  • 9 Lucas PA, Page PR, Phillip RD, Bennett AN. The impact of genital trauma on wounded servicemen: qualitative study. Injury 2014; 45 (05) 825-829
  • 10 VHA Directive. 1332 Infertility Evaluation and Treatment. 2017 . Available at: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9JTbctfGprUJ:https://www.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp%3Fpub_ID%3D5431+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari . Accessed October 31, 2019
  • 11 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion. Age-related fertility decline. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (2, Pt 1): 409-411
  • 12 Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2013; 99 (01) 37-43
  • 13 Goldman KN. The evolution of oocyte cryopreservation (OC): longitudinal trends at a single center. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: e164-e165
  • 14 Mucowski S. Current utilization status of cryopreserved oocytes in the United States. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: e31-e32
  • 15 ACOG. ACOG: Committee Opinion No. 584: oocyte cryopreservation. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (01) 221-222
  • 16 Del Mastro L, Ceppi M, Poggio F. , et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure in cancer women: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 40 (05) 675-683
  • 17 Chian RC, Wang Y, Li YR. Oocyte vitrification: advances, progress and future goals. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31 (04) 411-420
  • 18 Parmegiani L, Bertocci F, Garello C, Salvarani MC, Tambuscio G, Fabbri R. Efficiency of human oocyte slow freezing: results from five assisted reproduction centres. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18 (03) 352-359
  • 19 Oktay K, Cil AP, Bang H. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (01) 70-80
  • 20 Smith GD, Serafini PC, Fioravanti J. , et al. Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (06) 2088-2095
  • 21 Gook DA, Edgar DH. Human oocyte cryopreservation. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13 (06) 591-605
  • 22 Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R. , et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23 (02) 139-155
  • 23 Cobo A, Diaz C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (02) 277-285
  • 24 Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (09) 2239-2246
  • 25 Lewis EI, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Ginsburg ES. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2016; 106 (05) 1183-1189
  • 26 Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility?. Fertil Steril 2013; 100 (05) 1343-1349
  • 27 Devine K, Mumford SL, Goldman KN. , et al. Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth. Fertil Steril 2015; 103 (06) 1446-53.e1 , 2
  • 28 Milman LW, Senapati S, Sammel MD, Cameron KD, Gracia C. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing. Fertil Steril 2017; 107 (05) 1214-1222.e3
  • 29 ASRM. New York Becomes Tenth State to Require Coverage of IVF and Sixth State to Require Coverage for Fertility Preservation for Certain Patients. 2019 ;22. Available at: https://www.asrm.org/news-and-publications/news-and-research/press-releases-and-bulletins/new-york-becomes-tenth-state-to-require-coverage-of-ivf-and-sixth-state-to-require-coverage-for-fertility-preservation-for-certain-patients/ . Accessed October 4, 2019
  • 30 Abram McBride J, Lipshultz LI. Male fertility preservation. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 19 (07) 49
  • 31 Shin DH, Turek PJ. Sperm retrieval techniques. Nat Rev Urol 2013; 10 (12) 723-730
  • 32 Picton HM, Wyns C, Anderson RA. , et al; ESHRE Task Force On Fertility Preservation In Severe Diseases. A European perspective on testicular tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in prepubertal and adolescent boys. Hum Reprod 2015; 30 (11) 2463-2475
  • 33 van Casteren NJ, van Santbrink EJ, van Inzen W, Romijn JC, Dohle GR. Use rate and assisted reproduction technologies outcome of cryopreserved semen from 629 cancer patients. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (06) 2245-2250
  • 34 Habermann H, Seo R, Cieslak J, Niederberger C, Prins GS, Ross L. In vitro fertilization outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 (05) 955-960
  • 35 Levron J, Madgar I, Shefi S. , et al. IVF outcome with cryopreserved testicular sperm. Andrologia 2011; 43 (01) 48-51
  • 36 Huang C, Lei L, Wu HL. , et al. Long-term cryostorage of semen in a human sperm bank does not affect clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril 2019; 112 (04) 663-669.e1
  • 37 Feldschuh J, Brassel J, Durso N, Levine A. Successful sperm storage for 28 years. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (04) 1017
  • 38 Szell AZ, Bierbaum RC, Hazelrigg WB, Chetkowski RJ. Live births from frozen human semen stored for 40 years. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30 (06) 743-744
  • 39 Johnson MD, Cooper AR, Jungheim ES, Lanzendorf SE, Odem RR, Ratts VS. Sperm banking for fertility preservation: a 20-year experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170 (01) 177-182
  • 40 Saito K, Suzuki K, Iwasaki A, Yumura Y, Kubota Y. Sperm cryopreservation before cancer chemotherapy helps in the emotional battle against cancer. Cancer 2005; 104 (03) 521-524
  • 41 Edge B, Holmes D, Makin G. Sperm banking in adolescent cancer patients. Arch Dis Child 2006; 91 (02) 149-152
  • 42 Dean WK, Caplan AL, Parent B. Military genitourinary trauma: policies, implications, and ethics. Hastings Cent Rep 2016; 46 (06) 10-13
  • 43 Sonnenburg DW, Brames MJ, Case-Eads S, Einhorn LH. Utilization of sperm banking and barriers to its use in testicular cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2015; 23 (09) 2763-2768
  • 44 Grover NS, Deal AM, Wood WA, Mersereau JE. Young men with cancer experience low referral rates for fertility counseling and sperm banking. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12 (05) 465-471
  • 45 Nahata L, Cohen LE, Yu RN. Barriers to fertility preservation in male adolescents with cancer: it's time for a multidisciplinary approach that includes urologists. Urology 2012; 79 (06) 1206-1209
  • 46 Ben-Rafael Z. The dilemma of social oocyte freezing: usage rate is too low to make it cost-effective. Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 37 (04) 443-448
  • 47 Machen GL, Harris SE, Bird ET. , et al. Utilization of cryopreserved sperm cells based on the indication for storage. Investig Clin Urol 2018; 59 (03) 177-181
  • 48 Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, Pritchard N. , et al. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod 2017; 32 (03) 575-581
  • 49 Krulewitch CJ. Reproductive health of active duty women in medically austere environments. Mil Med 2016; 181 (09) 1166
  • 50 Zephyrin LC. Reproductive health management for the care of women Veterans. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127 (02) 383-392
  • 51 2017 Demographics Profile of the Military Community. 2017 . Available at: https://www.militaryonesource.mil/reports-and-surveys/demographic-profiles . Accessed August 31, 2019
  • 52 Returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan: assessment of readjustment needs of veterans, service members, and their families. Mil Med 2014; 179 (10) 1053-1055
  • 53 Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 547: Health care for women in the military and women veterans. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (06) 1538-1542
  • 54 Balzano FL, Hudak SJ. Military genitourinary injuries: past, present, and future. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7 (04) 646-652
  • 55 Janak JC, Orman JA, Soderdahl DW, Hudak SJ. Epidemiology of genitourinary injuries among male U.S. service members deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: early findings from the Trauma Outcomes and Urogenital Health (TOUGH) Project. J Urol 2017; 197 (02) 414-419
  • 56 Cannon JW, Hofmann LJ, Glasgow SC. , et al. Dismounted complex blast injuries: a comprehensive review of the modern combat experience. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 223 (04) 652-664.e8
  • 57 Oh JS, Do NV, Clouser M. , et al. Effectiveness of the combat pelvic protection system in the prevention of genital and urinary tract injuries: an observational study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 79 (04) (Suppl. 02) S193-S196
  • 58 Katon J, Cypel Y, Raza M. , et al. Self-reported infertility among male and female veterans serving during Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014; 23 (02) 175-183
  • 59 Ryan GL, Mengeling MA, Booth BM, Torner JC, Syrop CH, Sadler AG. Voluntary and involuntary childlessness in female veterans: associations with sexual assault. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (02) 539-547
  • 60 Schrader SM, Langford RE, Turner TW. , et al. Reproductive function in relation to duty assignments among military personnel. Reprod Toxicol 1998; 12 (04) 465-468
  • 61 Velez de la Calle JF, Rachou E, le Martelot MT, Ducot B, Multigner L, Thonneau PF. Male infertility risk factors in a French military population. Hum Reprod 2001; 16 (03) 481-486
  • 62 Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org; Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Posthumous retrieval and use of gametes or embryos: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018; 110 (01) 45-49
  • 63 Pastuszak AW, Lai WS, Hsieh TC, Lipshultz LI. Posthumous sperm utilization in men presenting for sperm banking: an analysis of patient choice. Andrology 2013; 1 (02) 251-255
  • 64 Kime P. Military's new fertility benefit will let troops freeze their sperm and eggs. Military Times. 2016 . Available at: https://www.militarytimes.com/pay-benefits/military-benefits/health-care/2016/01/29/military-s-new-fertility-benefit-will-let-troops-freeze-their-sperm-and-eggs/ . Accessed September 7, 2019
  • 65 R H. GOP objection kills Senate funding for military fertility program. McClatchy DC Bureau. Available at: https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article83811887.html . Accessed September 7, 2019
  • 66 Bob Woodruff Foundation. Intimacy after Injury Symposium. Available at: https://bobwoodrufffoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Intimacy-After-Injury-Report.pdf . Accessed September 7, 2019
  • 67 Callegari LS, Borrero S, Reiber GE. , et al. Reproductive life planning in primary care: a qualitative study of women Veterans' perceptions. Womens Health Issues 2015; 25 (05) 548-554
  • 68 Mattocks KM, Nikolajski C, Haskell S. , et al. Women veterans' reproductive health preferences and experiences: a focus group analysis. Womens Health Issues 2011; 21 (02) 124-129