Endoscopy 2020; 52(S 01): S61
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1704190
ESGE Days 2020 oral presentations
Thursday, April 23, 2020 16:30 – 18:00 Unlock en-bloc 2 Wicklow Hall 1
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

SMSH SCORE (SIZE, MANEUVERABILITY, SITE, HISTORY) A NEW SCORE TO PREDICT EFFICACY AND COMPLICATIONS OF COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD)

J Jacques
1   University Hospital of Limoges, Hepato-Gastro-Enterologie, Limoges, France
,
R Legros
2   University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
,
J Albouys
2   University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
,
H Lepetit
2   University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
,
M Dahan
3   Université de Limoges, Hepato-Gastro-Enterologie, Limoges, France,
,
D Sautereau
3   Université de Limoges, Hepato-Gastro-Enterologie, Limoges, France,
,
J Rivory
4   Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France
,
M Pioche
4   Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 April 2020 (online)

 

Aims ESD is the gold standard for the treatment of large colorectal superficial lesions.The objective of this study was to identify pre-procedural predictive factors of R0 resection and perforation and try to design a predictive score.

Methods Prospective cohort study including all cases of ESD from a French referent center between 12/2012 and 09/2019. Primary endpoint was to identify predictive factors of R0 Resection, secondary endpoints was validation of a new score that could predict R0 and non R0 resection.

Results 466 lesions were included, 198 (42.4%) rectal lesions and 268 (57.6%) colonic.

The en bloc, R0 and curative resection rates were 94.8%, 80.2% and 75.7%, respectively.

In multivariate analysis: size of more than 8 cm (OR: 0.335,p = 0.034), poor endoscopic maneuverability (OR: 0.285,p = 0.001), localization anal verge, sigmoid or right angle (OR 0.386: p = 0.001), were significant pre-procedure risk factors for non-R0 resection.

A new score called SMSH (Size-Maneuverability-Site-History) was created to predict through pre-procedure criteria the effectiveness of colorectal ESD.

This score is divided into 3 groups 1 (< 4 points); 2 (> = 4 and < 8 points); 3 (> = 8 points) of increasing difficulty.

Applied to our prospective cohort 72 (15.9%) patients were classified as SMSH 1, 196 SMSH 2 (43.3%) and 185 SMSH 3 (40.8%).

There was a significant difference between the 3 groups:

- R0 resection rate: SMSH 1: 90.3%; SMSH 2: 84.6%; SMSH 3: 74.6% p = 0.0057

- Perforation rate: SMSH 1: 4,1%; SMSH 2: 5,6%; SMSH 3: 12,4% p=0,02

Conclusions SMSH score is able to predict results of colorectal ESD based on pre-procedural data. This new score should to help physicians to target their lesions according to their expertise. Independent validation cohort is needed.