Visiting Student Away Rotations in Ophthalmology: A Study of Medical Students' Experiences and Perspectives

Abstract

Background Despite the frequency of medical students' participation in ophthalmology clerkships away from their home institution, the impact and benefit of these clerkships have remained uninvestigated. To date, no study has focused specifically on medical student perspectives of away ophthalmology clerkships.

Objective The purpose of the study was to evaluate the medical students' perspectives on and experience with away rotations in ophthalmology, and assess their effect on residency Match outcomes.

Methods An anonymous, original, online survey was designed and distributed to applicants of the 2015 to 2018 ophthalmology Match cycles.

Results A total of 69 responses from nine medical institutions were collected (62% response rate). Forty-one respondents (59%) chose to perform at least one away rotation. Among away rotators, the mean number performed was 1.44. Thirty-seven away rotators (90%) reported receiving an interview from at least one host institution they visited. The average estimated cost of an away rotation was ∼1,709 U.S. dollars. With a 95.7% overall match rate among the respondents, no statistically significant difference was seen in match rates between away rotators and nonaway rotators (p = 0.564). Among the away rotators, the mean position on their rank order list matched was 2.34, while the nonaway rotators matched at a mean position of 2.13 (p = 0.383).

Conclusion No association between away participation and success in the San Francisco Match was observed in this study. However, study participants did experience non-Match-related benefits from away elective participation.

Keywords

audition - away rotation - education - elective - match - medical student - ophthalmology - residency - visiting student

• References

• 1 Oladeji LO, Raley JA, Smith S, Perez JL, McGwin G, Ponce BA. Behind the Match process: is there any financial difference lurking below the specialty of choice?. Am Surg 2016; 82 (12) 1163-1168
• 2 Winterton M, Ahn J, Bernstein J. The prevalence and cost of medical student visiting rotations. BMC Med Educ 2016; 16 (01) 291
• 3 Higgins E, Newman L, Halligan K, Miller M, Schwab S, Kosowicz L. Do audition electives impact match success?. Med Educ Online 2016; 21: 31325
• 4 Weissbart SJ, Stock JA, Wein AJ. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency. Urology 2015; 85 (04) 731-736
• 5 Camp CL, Sousa PL, Hanssen AD. , et al. The cost of getting into orthopedic residency: analysis of applicant demographics, expenditures, and the value of away rotations. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (05) 886-891
• 6 Al Khalili K, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S. , et al. Programs selection criteria for neurological surgery applicants in the United States: a national survey for neurological surgery program directors. World Neurosurg 2014; 81 (3-4): 473-477.e2
• 7 Fabri PJ, Powell DL, Cupps NB. Is there value in audition extramurals?. Am J Surg 1995; 169 (03) 338-340
• 8 Vogt HB, Thanel FH, Hearns VL. The audition elective and its relation to success in the National Resident Matching Program. Teach Learn Med 2000; 12 (02) 78-80
• 9 Grubbs Jr JR, Mian SI. Advising students interested in ophthalmology: a summary of the evidence. Ophthalmology 2016; 123 (07) 1406-1410
• 10 Lee AG, Golnik KC, Oetting TA. , et al. Re-engineering the resident applicant selection process in ophthalmology: a literature review and recommendations for improvement. Surv Ophthalmol 2008; 53 (02) 164-176
• 11 Green M, Jones P, Thomas Jr JX. Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey. Acad Med 2009; 84 (03) 362-367
• 12 Nallasamy S, Uhler T, Nallasamy N, Tapino PJ, Volpe NJ. Ophthalmology resident selection: current trends in selection criteria and improving the process. Ophthalmology 2010; 117 (05) 1041-1047