Undergraduate Students’ Acceptance of a Reciprocating One-File System for Endodontic Treatment

Abstract

Objectives Reciprocating endodontic one-file systems are a comparatively new method for root canal shaping. Even though the mechanical properties are comparable to modern rotating mechanical systems, data about subjective assessment and application quality are scarce. This study evaluates the reciprocating one-file system in undergraduate education.

Materials and Methods A total of 42 undergraduate students without experience regarding reciprocating file systems filled in a questionnaire in four different points in time (t ₁–t ₄) anonymously. The questionnaire was based on a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10.

Statistical Analysis A least significant difference post-hoc analysis comparing the group average values was performed. The adjusted level of significance was p < 0.004 after Bonferroni correction.

Results All rating scores increased after the first theoretical instruction. After the first practical training in artificial root canals in resin blocks and extracted teeth (t ₂), the estimation of “time efficiency” (p = 0.002), “handling” (p < 0.001), and “overall impression” (p < 0.001) improved significantly. The “overall impression” remained constant and showed no significant changes after the first practical training.

Conclusions Reciprocating systems seem to show a good acceptance among first time users. Initial concerns about “work safety” decrease during every step of the educational process. Reciprocating one-file systems are a safe and well-accepted method in undergraduate teaching.

Keywords

reciprocation - undergraduate teaching - endodontics - one-file system

Publication History

Article published online:
21 May 2020

• References

• 1 Rodrigues E, De-Deus G, Souza E, Silva EJ. Safe mechanical preparation with reciprocation movement without glide path creation: result from a pool of 673 root canals. Braz Dent J 2016; 27 (01) 22-27
• 2 Bartols A, Robra BP, Walther W. The ability of Reciproc instruments to reach full working length without glide path preparation: a clinical retrospective study. Peer J 2017; 5: e3583
• 3 De-Deus G, Arruda TE, Souza EM. et al. The ability of the Reciproc R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path. Int Endod J 2013; 46 (10) 993-998
• 4 Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012; 45 (05) 449-461
• 5 da Frota MF, Espir CG, Berbert FL. et al. Comparison of cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance in reciprocating single-file systems and continuous rotary instrumentation systems. J Oral Sci 2014; 56 (04) 269-275
• 6 Saber SE, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2015; 48 (01) 109-114
• 7 Celik D, Taşdemir T, Er K. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. J Endod 2013; 39 (02) 278-282
• 8 Machado R, Comparin D, Back ED, Garcia LDFR, Alberton LR. Residual smear layer after root canal instrumentation by using Niti, M-Wire and CM-Wire instruments: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (03) 403-409
• 9 Kesim B, Sagsen B, Aslan T. Evaluation of dentinal defects during root canal preparation using thermomechanically processed nickel-titanium files. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (02) 157-161
• 10 Arruda EDS, Sponchiado-Júnior EC, Pandolfo MT, Fredson MAC, Roberi Garcia LDF, Marques AA. Apical transportation and centering ability after root canal filling removal using reciprocating and continuous rotary systems: a CBCT study. Eur J Dent 2019; 13 (04) 613-618
• 11 Bartols A, Christofzik DW, Krummel M. et al. Assessment of different root canal preparation techniques with rotary nickel-titanium instruments by novice students. Dent J (Basel) 2018; 6 (03) E46
• 12 De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Vieira VT. et al. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod 2017; 43 (03) 462-466
• 13 Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, Keleş A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of reciproc blue, reciproc, and waveOne gold reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2017; 43 (08) 1360-1363
• 14 Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of reciproc blue and reciproc files in an s-shaped canal. J Endod 2017; 43 (10) 1679-1682
• 15 Caballero-Flores H, Nabeshima CK, Binotto E, Machado MEL. Fracture incidence of instruments from a single-file reciprocating system by students in an endodontic graduate programme: a cross-sectional retrospective study. Int Endod J 2019; 52 (01) 13-18
• 16 Muñoz E, Forner L, Llena C. Influence of operator’s experience on root canal shaping ability with a rotary nickel-titanium single-file reciprocating motion system. J Endod 2014; 40 (04) 547-550
• 17 Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ha JH, Kim SK, Lee H, Kim HC. Preference of undergraduate students after first experience on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Restor Dent Endod 2016; 41 (03) 176-181
• 18 Maniglia-Ferreira C, de Almeida Gomes F, Ximenes T. et al. Influence of reuse and cervical preflaring on the fracture strength of reciprocating instruments. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (01) 41-47