CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2020; 99(S 02): S46
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710841
Abstracts
Imaging/Sonography

Measurement of the cochlear duct length (CDL) using the flat-panel volume CT

P Schendzielorz
1   Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen Würzburg
,
L Ilgen
1   Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen Würzburg
,
T Neun
2   Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie Würzburg
,
S Zabler
3   Universität Würzburg, Röntgenmikroskopie Würzburg
,
D Althoff
3   Universität Würzburg, Röntgenmikroskopie Würzburg
,
R Hagen
1   Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen Würzburg
,
K Rak
1   Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen Würzburg
› Author Affiliations
 

Introduction Cochlea implants (CI) can restore speech perception in patients with severe hearing loss or deafness. Studies have shown that the length and type of the electrode array and the anatomy of the cochlea have an impact on the clinical outcome. Hence, a preoperative exact measurement of the cochlear length (CDL) to select the optimal CI electrode array becomes more important.

Methods This study compares a flat panel volume CT (fpVCT) with a High Resolution CT (HRCT) of temporal bones for CDL-measurements. It was investigated if a manual measurement after 3D-curved multiplanar reconstruction improves accuracy over common formulas for CDL-calculation. For reference control, images were taken in a µ-CT.

Results The determination of the CDL in fpVCT compared to HRCT did not differ significantly. Compared to the reference measurement in µ-CT, the errors increase from basal to apical turns of the cochlea in both modalities and can be reduced by measuring 2 turns (2TL). A manual 2TL- or CDL-measurement provides acceptable to excellent intraobserver-variability regardless of the modality. Manual measurements in fpVCT and HRCT produce systematic errors compared to the reference, while formulas are more likely to produce random errors.

Conclusion Manual CDL-measurement using 3D-curved multiplanar reconstruction provides a clinically methodological benefit over formulas for CDL-calculation. At the moment, fpVCT cannot further improve accuracy compared to HRCT. However, using fpVCT radiation dose is reduced, acquisition times are shorter and a better reduction of metal artifacts can be achieved in postoperative quality control.

Poster-PDF A-1139.PDF



Publication History

Article published online:
10 June 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York