CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2020; 99(S 02): S300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1711226
Abstracts
Otology

Longitudinal assessment of the hearing effort of CI patients using ACALES

Andreas Radeloff
1   Univ.-HNO-Klinik, Evang. Krankenhaus, Oldenburg
,
Melanie Krüger
2   HörTech gGmbH, Oldenburg
,
Jorena Minde
1   Univ.-HNO-Klinik, Evang. Krankenhaus, Oldenburg
,
Silke Gürtler
1   Univ.-HNO-Klinik, Evang. Krankenhaus, Oldenburg
,
Jana Müller
1   Univ.-HNO-Klinik, Evang. Krankenhaus, Oldenburg
› Author Affiliations
 

In addition to the classical speech intelligibility tests, measurement methods for everyday use are increasingly required. One aspect here is the subjectively perceived hearing effort, which is very relevant for many cochlear implant (CI) patients, especially in noise.

ACALES (adaptive categorial listening effort scaling) is a standardized method for measuring subjective hearing effort. Here, a speech signal with noise from the Oldenburg sentence test is automatically offered, whereby the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is adaptively varied. The patient is asked for a subjective assessment from "effortless" to "extremely effortful".

Here we present the results of a longitudinally investigated group of CI patients who were treated bimodally (n=13) or with unilateral deafness (SSD; n=8). The longitudinal course of the hearing effort showed large interindividual differences. As expected, the listening effort in the group of bimodal patients was higher both preoperatively (with hearing aids) and postoperatively than in the group of SSD patients. Almost all patients achieved an improvement of their individual listening effort after 6 months at the latest compared to preoperatively best aided.

Based on the experience gained here, ACALES appears to be a reliable and easy to use method for determining the subjective listening effort in CI patients. The assessment of individual listening effort with ACALES can complement the classical speech tests.

Poster-PDF A-1821.PDF



Publication History

Article published online:
10 June 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York