CC BY 4.0 · TH Open 2020; 04(02): e119-e126
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713683
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Daily Practice

1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
2   Department of Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Wilhelmina J.E. Stenger
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Albert T.A. Mairuhu
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
2   Department of Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
Jeroen Eikenboom
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Jaap Fogteloo
3   Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Menno V. Huisman
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
› Institutsangaben
Funding None.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

24. März 2020

25. Mai 2020

Publikationsdatum:
24. Juni 2020 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Phase 3 trials have shown comparable efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), with less major bleeding events in patients randomized to DOAC treatment. With DOACs being increasingly used in clinical practice, evaluation of the DOACs in daily practice-based conditions is needed to confirm their safety and effectiveness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of apixaban in VTE patients in daily practice.

Methods In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients diagnosed with VTE in two Dutch hospitals (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden and Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague) were identified based on administrative codes. We assessed recurrent VTE, major bleeding and mortality during a 3-month follow-up period in those treated with apixaban.

Results Of 671 consecutive VTE patients treated with apixaban, 371 presented with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and 300 patients with deep-vein thrombosis. During 3 months treatment, 2 patients had a recurrent VTE (0.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08–1.1), 12 patients had major bleeding (1.8%; 95% CI: 1.0–3.2), and 11 patients died (1.6%; 95% CI: 0.9–2.9), of which one patient with recurrent PE and one because of a intracerebral bleeding.

Conclusion In this daily practice-based cohort, apixaban yielded a low incidence of recurrent VTE, comparable to the phase 3 AMPLIFY study patients. The incidence of major bleeding was higher than in the AMPLIFY-study patients, reflecting the importance of daily practice evaluation and the fact that results from phase III clinical studies cannot be directly extrapolated toward daily practice.

Essentials

• In VTE treatment, phase 3 studies have shown comparable efficacy of DOACs and VKA, with a better bleeding profile.


• Both efficacy and bleeding rates may be underestimated in phase 3 trials because patients at higher risk of bleeding are usually excluded.


• In this practice-based cohort, the incidence of major bleeding was higher than in the AMPLIFY study patients.


• Results from phase III clinical studies cannot be directly extrapolated toward daily practice.


Authors' Contributions

S.V.H. contributed to concept and design of the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. M.V.H. contributed to concept and design of the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, reviewed the manuscript, and provided important intellectual content. J.C.J.E. reviewed the manuscript and provided important intellectual content. J.F. reviewed the manuscript and provided important intellectual content. W.J.E.S. analyzed and interpreted the data and provided important intellectual content. A.T.A.M. reviewed the manuscript and provided important intellectual content. F.A.K. reviewed the manuscript, contributed to concept and design of the study, and analyzed and interpreted the data.