Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34(03): 165-170
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714269
Review Article

Propeller Flaps in the Head and Neck

Adriana Cordova
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
,
Salvatore D'Arpa
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
,
Fernando Rosatti
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
,
Marta Nichelini
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
,
Giovanni Maria D'Antonio
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
,
Salvatore Giordano
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
,
Francesca Toia
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Propeller flaps have significantly expanded the reconstruction possibilities in the head and neck region. They allow for increased flap mobility and better scar concealing, and/or to perform a one-stage reconstruction with local tissue of similar color and texture, where multiple surgeries would be needed with traditional flaps or even free flaps would be required. This article describes the main propeller flaps for one-stage reconstruction in the head–neck region (facial artery perforator, supratrochlear artery axial perforator, deep lingual artery axial perforator, and anterior supraclavicular artery perforator flaps), their indications, and possible complications. Aesthetic and functional results of propeller flaps in the head and neck region are very good and the complication rate is low, but due to their surgical complexity and the availability of many simpler local flaps, they are indicated only in select cases where local flaps are unavailable or would require multiple staged procedures to complete the construction.



Publication History

Article published online:
22 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Pignatti M, Ogawa R, Hallock GG. , et al. The “Tokyo” consensus on propeller flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (02) 716-722
  • 2 Toia F, D'Arpa S, Pignatti M, Noel W, Cordova A. Axial propeller flaps: a proposal for update of the “Tokyo consensus on propeller flaps”. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (06) 857-860
  • 3 Lee JY, Kim JM, Kwon H, Jung SN, Shim HS, Kim SW. Freestyle local perforator flaps for facial reconstruction. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 707065
  • 4 Ruiz-Moya A, Lagares-Borrego A, Infante-Cossío P. Propeller facial artery perforator flap as first reconstructive option for nasolabial and perinasal complex defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (04) 457-463
  • 5 D'Arpa S, Pirrello R, Toia F, Moschella F, Cordova A. Reconstruction of nasal alar defects with freestyle facial artery perforator flaps. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (03) 277-286
  • 6 D'Arpa S, Cordova A, Pirrello R, Moschella F. Free style facial artery perforator flap for one stage reconstruction of the nasal ala. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (01) 36-42
  • 7 Hofer SOP, Posch NA, Smit X. The facial artery perforator flap for reconstruction of perioral defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (04) 996-1003 , discussion 1004–1005
  • 8 Ng ZY, Fogg QA, Shoaib T. Where to find facial artery perforators: a reference point. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (12) 2046-2051
  • 9 Qassemyar Q, Havet E, Sinna R. Vascular basis of the facial artery perforator flap: analysis of 101 perforator territories. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (02) 421-429
  • 10 Rossi M, Roggio T, Cajozzo M. Lembi perforanti, propeller e freestyle nella ricostruzione labiale. In: Manuale di Microchirurgia: Lembi perforanti, propeller e freestyle peduncolati. Palermo University Press: 2017: 102-109
  • 11 Menick FJ. Nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36 (03) 443-459
  • 12 Shumrick KA, Smith TL. The anatomic basis for the design of forehead flaps in nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118 (04) 373-379
  • 13 Cordova A, D'Arpa S, Moschella F. A new one-stage method for nose reconstruction: the supratrochlear artery perforator propeller flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (03) 571e-573e
  • 14 Cordova A, D'Arpa S, Massimiliano T, Toia F, Moschella F. A propeller flap for single-stage nose reconstruction in selected patients: supratrochlear artery axial propeller flap. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (03) 332-341
  • 15 Ugur MB, Savranlar A, Uzun L, Küçüker H, Cinar F. A reliable surface landmark for localizing supratrochlear artery: medial canthus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138 (02) 162-165
  • 16 Santecchia L. Anatomia vascolare della faccia. In: Manuale di Microchirurgia: Lembi Perforanti, Propeller e Freestyle Peduncolati. Palermo University Press; 2017: 54-59
  • 17 Cordova A, Toia F, D'Arpa S, Giunta G, Moschella F. A new mucosal propeller flap (deep lingual artery axial propeller): the renaissance of lingual flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (03) 584e-594e
  • 18 Hyakusoku H, Yamamoto T, Fumiiri M. The propeller flap method. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44 (01) 53-54
  • 19 Cohen DS, Low GMI, Melkane AE. , et al. Establishing a danger zone: an anatomic study of the lingual artery in base of tongue surgery. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (01) 110-115
  • 20 Squaquara R, Kim Evans KF, Spanio di Spilimbergo S, Mardini S. Intraoral reconstruction using local and regional flaps. Semin Plast Surg 2010; 24 (02) 198-211
  • 21 D'Arpa S, Toia F, Pirrello R, Moschella F, Cordova A. Propeller flaps: a review of indications, technique, and results. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 986829
  • 22 Goldie SJ, Jackson MS, Soutar DS, Shaw-Dunn J. The functional intraoral Glasgow scale (FIGS) in retromolar trigone cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (07) 743-746
  • 23 Di Fede V, Grassi R, Toia F, Di Rosa L, Cordova A. FLiGS score: a new method of outcome assessment for lip carcinoma-treated patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (03) e345
  • 24 Pallua N, Wolter TP. Moving forwards: the anterior supraclavicular artery perforator (a-SAP) flap: a new pedicled or free perforator flap based on the anterior supraclavicular vessels. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 489-496
  • 25 Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. , eds. The arterial anatomy of skin flaps. In: Head and Neck. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1986: 419-421
  • 26 Cordova A, Pirrello R, D'Arpa S. , et al. Vascular anatomy of the supraclavicular area revisited: feasibility of the free supraclavicular perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 1399
  • 27 Ma X, Zheng Y, Xia W. , et al. An anatomical study with clinical application of one branch of the supraclavicular artery. Clin Anat 2009; 22: 215-220
  • 28 Vinh VQ, Van Anh T, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H. Anatomical and clinical studies of the supraclavicular flap: analysis of 103 flaps used to reconstruct neck scar contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 1471-1480
  • 29 Lecours C, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C. , et al. Freestyle pedicle perforator flaps: clinical results and vascular anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1589-1603 [Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127(4):1753]
  • 30 Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (05) 1529-1544