J Wrist Surg 2021; 10(01): 064-069
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715089
Procedure

Initial Outcomes of a Novel High-Visibility Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Technique

Bo Liu
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Fourth Clinical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
,
Feiran Wu
2   Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Funding The study was funded by the Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program (PX2018018) and Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital High-level Talents “Key Researcher” Program (XKGG201801).

Abstract

Background A large variety of endoscopic carpal tunnel release methods have been described in efforts to shorten recovery time, reduce scar discomfort, and allow earlier return to work. The majority of existing techniques are the modifications of the Agee, Chow, and Menon techniques, all of which require dedicated equipment that can increase facility and surgical fees for the patient and institution. We present a novel high-visibility endoscopic carpal tunnel release technique that uses common hand surgery instruments available in all surgical units, without requiring disposable or custom devices.

Description of Technique The cases were performed under local anesthesia using routine reusable instruments and a conventional 2.5-mm 30-degree small joint arthroscope. Following proximal dissection, a clear, colorless, plastic shield was created from a standard syringe that offered a 360-degree vision of the carpal tunnel and protection of the median nerve. Release of the transverse carpal ligament was performed under full arthroscopic vision using Metzenbaum dissection scissors.

Methods This pilot study analyses the first nine cases in eight patients who were operated on using this technique, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up.

Results No peri- or postoperative complications were encountered. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score, and a visual analog score for pain.

Conclusion The high-visibility endoscopic carpal tunnel release technique is safe and effective, and offers a viable cost-reducing alternative to the existing endoscopic methods for carpal tunnel syndrome. Future comparative trials are required to validate these findings in a larger series.

Level of Evidence This is a Level IV study.

Ethical Approval

The Local Ethical Committee approved the research protocol in advance.




Publication History

Received: 16 May 2020

Accepted: 17 June 2020

Article published online:
02 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Vasiliadis HS, Nikolakopoulou A, Shrier I. et al. Endoscopic and open release similarly safe for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10 (12) e0143683
  • 2 Trumble TE, Diao E, Abrams RA, Gilbert-Anderson MM. Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (07) 1107-1115
  • 3 Seradge H, Seradge E. Piso-triquetral pain syndrome after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (05) 858-862
  • 4 Louis DS, Greene TL, Noellert RC. Complications of carpal tunnel surgery. J Neurosurg 1985; 62 (03) 352-356
  • 5 Gould D, Kulber D, Kuschner S, Dellamaggiorra R, Cohen M. Our surgical experience: open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (09) 853-861
  • 6 Erhard L, Ozalp T, Citron N, Foucher G. Carpal tunnel release by the Agee endoscopic technique. Results at 4 year follow-up. J Hand Surg [Br] 1999; 24 (05) 583-585
  • 7 Agee JM, McCarroll Jr HR, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA. Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (06) 987-995
  • 8 Chow JCY. Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 1989; 5 (01) 19-24
  • 9 Chow JCY, Hantes ME. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: thirteen years' experience with the Chow technique. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (06) 1011-1018
  • 10 Tuzuner S, Sherman GM, Ozkaynak S, Ozcanli H. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: modification of Menon's technique and data from 191 cases. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (07) 721-727
  • 11 Castelli PG, Dell'Uomo A, Ferrari C. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: Menon's technique. In: Luchetti R, Amadio P. eds. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Berlin: Springer; 2007: 177-185
  • 12 Scholten RJPM, Mink van der Molen A, Uitdehaag BMJ, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (04) CD003905
  • 13 Zhang S, Vora M, Harris AHS, Baker L, Curtin C, Kamal RN. Cost-minimization analysis of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (23) 1970-1977
  • 14 Cardoso R, Szabo RM. Wrist anatomy and surgical approaches. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38 (02) 127-148 , v
  • 15 Ip WYJ, Sweed TA, Fung KKB, Tipoe GL, Pun TS. A new technique of single portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2012; 16 (01) 27-29
  • 16 Chung KC, Walters MR, Greenfield ML, Chernew ME. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (04) 1089-1099
  • 17 Chen AC, Wu M-H, Chang C-H, Cheng CY, Hsu KY. Single portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: modification of Menon's technique and data from 65 cases. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (01) 61-65
  • 18 Sayegh ET, Strauch RJ. Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (03) 1120-1132
  • 19 Atroshi I, Hofer M, Larsson G-U, Ranstam J. Extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of open vs endoscopic release surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. JAMA 2015; 314 (13) 1399-1401
  • 20 Kang HJ, Koh IH, Lee TJ, Choi YR. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release is preferred over mini-open despite similar outcome: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (05) 1548-1554