Novel Classification of Posttraumatic Ear Deformities and its Surgical Management

Abstract

Background Classification of posttraumatic ear deformities and its reconstruction is an uphill task for a reconstructive surgeon as they present in various combinations. In our study, we have described ear deformity as per a new classification and reconstructed the ear accordingly.

Method Posttraumatic ear deformity was described under the following four headings: (a) zone of defect, (b) size of defect, (c) missing components, and (d) condition of surrounding skin. Twenty-six posttraumatic ear deformities were operated using postauricular skin flap (14), temporoparietal fascial (TPF) flaps (8), preauricular skin flap (1), intralesional excision (2), and primary closure with chondrocutaneous advancement in one patient. Costal cartilage was used for reconstruction of framework wherever required. Framework elevation was done 4 to 6 months postoperatively.

Results Posttraumatic ear deformity was more common in males. Bite injury and road traffic accidents were the common causes. Zones I, II and III were most frequently involved. Four patients complained about size, contour, and projection of reconstructed ear. Three patients were not satisfied by the appearance of junction between reconstructed and residual ear. Four patients in whom the reconstruction was done with TPF, costal cartilage, and thin (SSG) split skin grafts complained of hyperpigmentation of reconstructed ear.

Conclusion Classification of posttraumatic ear deformity and its reconstruction is a surgical challenge. Unscarred postauricular skin and TPF flaps are the workhorse flaps for reconstruction of acquired ear deformities. Our classification helps in describing the defect, documenting it, planning reconstruction, and aiding in assessing postoperative outcomes.

Keywords

traumatic ear deformity - zone of defect - post auricular skin - temporoparietal fascia flap

Publication History

Article published online:
10 August 2020

• References

• 1 Brent BD. Reconstruction of ear. In: Neligan PC. ed. Plastic Surgery. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Saunders; 2013: 187-225
• 2 Brent B. Reconstruction of auricle. In: McCarthy JG. ed. Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: W B Saunders; 1990. 3. 2094-2152
• 3 Luo X, Yang J, Yang Q, Wang X. Classification and reconstruction of posttraumatic ear deformity. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (03) 654-657
• 4 Li D, Xu F, Zhang R. et al. Surgical reconstruction of traumatic partial ear defects based on a novel classification of defect sizes and surrounding skin condition. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (02) 307e-316e
• 5 Brent B. The acquired auricular deformity. A systematic approach to its analysis and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 59 (04) 475-485
• 6 Nagata S. A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (02) 187-201
• 7 Schonauer F, Vuppalapati G, Marlino S, Santorelli A, Canta L, Molea G. Versatility of the posterior auricular flap in partial ear reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (04) 1213-1221
• 8 Kolodzynski MN, Kon M, Egger S, Breugem CC. Mechanisms of ear trauma and reconstructive techniques in 105 consecutive patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (02) 723-728
• 9 Sharma M, Dudipala RR, Mathew J. et al. Objective analysis of microtia reconstruction in Indian patients and modifications in management protocol. Indian J Plast Surg 2015; 48 (02) 144-152
• 10 Antia NH, Buch VI. Chondrocutaneous advancement flap for the marginal defect of the ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 39 (05) 472-477
• 11 Brent B, Byrd HS. Secondary ear reconstruction with cartilage grafts covered by axial, random, and free flaps of temporoparietal fascia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72 (02) 141-152
• 12 Alconchel MD, Rodrigo J, Cimorra GA. A combined flap technique for earlobe reconstruction in one stage. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49 (04) 242-244
• 13 Singh A, Singh G. Earlobe reconstruction using a Limberg flap in six ears. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56 (01) 33-36