Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(05): 556-563
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715616
Original Research

Facelift Surgery: History, Anatomy, and Recent Innovations

1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Oren Friedman
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Facelift surgery has become a beautifully predictable, safe, and extremely effective operation. Our patients can expect natural and long-lasting results as a direct outcome of our improved understanding and applications of surgical facial anatomy. Rhytidectomy, once an operation of simple well-placed elliptical skin excisions, evolved to include longer skin flaps, skin and platysma flaps with various superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) manipulations, and various deep plane techniques involving the skin and SMAS as a single unit composite flap. Extended deep plane rhytidectomy and vertical vector neck and SMAS lifting have emerged in recent years as techniques that extend the traditional deep plane dissection into the neck in a subplatysmal plane to allow for release of the platysma from the cervical retaining ligaments. This, ultimately, allows for the creation of a dramatically more youthful appearing face, neck, and jawline.



Publication History

Article published online:
16 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Barrett DM, Casanueva FJ, Wang TD. Evolution of the rhytidectomy. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 2 (01) 38-44
  • 2 Hollander E. Plastische (Kosmetische) operation: Kritische Darstellung ihres gegenwartigen Standes. Neue Deutsche Klinik. 1932; 9: 1-17
  • 3 Haiken E. The making of the modern face: cosmetic surgery. Soc Res (New York) 2000; 67 (01) 81-97
  • 4 Skoog TG. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1974
  • 5 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (01) 80-88
  • 6 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (01) 11-16
  • 7 Mendelson B. Facelift anatomy, SMAS, retaining ligaments and facial spaces. In: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. London: Elsevier; 2009: 53-72
  • 8 Saban Y, Polselli R, Bertossi D, East C, Gerbault O. Facial layers and facial fat compartments: focus on midcheek area. Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33 (05) 470-482
  • 9 Friedman O. Changes associated with the aging face. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (03) 371-380
  • 10 Bolognia JL. Dermatologic and cosmetic concerns of the older woman. Clin Geriatr Med 1993; 9 (01) 209-229
  • 11 Moss CJ, Mendelson BC, Taylor GI. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (04) 1475-1490 , discussion 1491–1498
  • 12 Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 873-911
  • 13 Mendelson BC, Muzaffar AR, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 885-896 , discussion 897–911
  • 14 Mendelson BC, Jacobson SR. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek: facial layers, spaces, and the midcheek segments. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (03) 395-404 , discussion 393
  • 15 Nelson DW, Gingrass RP. Anatomy of the mandibular branches of the facial nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64 (04) 479-482
  • 16 Polselli R, Saban Y. Anatomie du visage et du cou: en chirurgie et cosmétologie. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Elsevier Masson; 2015
  • 17 Baker DC, Conley J. Avoiding facial nerve injuries in rhytidectomy. Anatomical variations and pitfalls. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64 (06) 781-795
  • 18 McKinney P, Katrana DJ. Prevention of injury to the great auricular nerve during rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (05) 675-679
  • 19 Friedman O. Facelift surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (02) 120-128
  • 20 Lemmon ML, Hamra ST. Skoog rhytidectomy: a five-year experience with 577 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 65 (03) 283-297
  • 21 Kamer FM, Frankel AS. SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 878-881
  • 22 Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (02) 509-513
  • 23 Aufricht G. Surgery for excess skin of the face and neck. In: Transactions of the Second Congress of the International Society of Plastic Surgeons. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1960: 495
  • 24 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
  • 25 Godin MS, Johnson Jr CM. Deep-plane/composite rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg 1996; 12 (03) 231-239
  • 26 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 1-13
  • 27 Owsley Jr JQ. SMAS-platysma facelift. A bidirectional cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10 (03) 429-440
  • 28 Aston SJ. Platysma-SMAS cervicofacial rhytidoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10 (03) 507-520
  • 29 Baker TJ, Stuzin JM. Personal technique of face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (02) 502-508
  • 30 Ramirez OM. Multidimensional evaluation and surgical approaches to neck rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 2014; 41 (01) 99-107
  • 31 Jacono AA, Parikh SS, Kennedy WA. Anatomical comparison of platysmal tightening using superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication vs deep-plane rhytidectomy techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (06) 395-397
  • 32 Siwani R, Friedman O. Anatomic evaluation of the vertical face-lift in cadavers. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (06) 422-427
  • 33 Ellenbogen R, Karlin JV. Visual criteria for success in restoring the youthful neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (06) 826-837
  • 34 Jacono AA, Parikh SS. The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (08) 874-890
  • 35 Jacono A, Bryant LM. Extended deep plane facelift: incorporating facial retaining ligament release and composite flap shifts to maximize midface, jawline and neck rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 527-554
  • 36 Jacono AA, Bryant LM, Ahmedli NN. A novel extended deep plane facelift technique for jawline rejuvenation and volumization. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (12) 1265-1281
  • 37 Perkins SW, Waters HH. The extended SMAS approach to neck rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (02) 253-268
  • 38 Perkins SW, Patel AB. Extended superficial muscular aponeurotic system rhytidectomy: a graded approach. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (04) 575-587 , vi
  • 39 Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S. et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (06) 2074-2086
  • 40 Tonnard P, Verpaele A. The MACS-lift short scar rhytidectomy. Aesthet Surg J 2007; 27 (02) 188-198
  • 41 Hamra ST. Frequent face lift sequelae: hollow eyes and the lateral sweep: cause and repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (05) 1658-1666
  • 42 Litner JA, Adamson PA. Limited vs extended face-lift techniques: objective analysis of intraoperative results. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (03) 186-190
  • 43 Jacono AA, Talei B. Vertical neck lifting. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (02) 285-316
  • 44 Jacono AA, Rousso JJ. The modern minimally invasive face lift: has it replaced the traditional access approach?. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2013; 21 (02) 171-189
  • 45 Barton Jr FE. Aesthetic surgery of the face and neck. Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29 (06) 449-463 , quiz 464–466
  • 46 Warren RJ, Aston SJ, Mendelson BC. Face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 747e-764e