Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(04): 671-679
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716538
Research Article

Patient-Initiated Data: Our Experience with Enabling Patients to Initiate Incorporation of Heart Rate Data into the Electronic Health Record

Joshua M. Pevnick
1   Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
2   Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Yaron Elad
1   Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Lisa M. Masson
1   Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Richard V. Riggs
1   Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
3   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Ray G. Duncan
1   Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was funded in part through a research award from Cedars-Sinai Precision Health. J.P. was supported by the National Institute on Aging, United States of the National Institutes of Health, United States under award K23AG049181. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Abstract

Background Provider organizations increasingly allow incorporation of patient-generated data into electronic health records (EHRs). In 2015, we began allowing patients to upload data to our EHR without physician orders, which we henceforth call patient-initiated data (PAIDA). Syncing wearable heart rate monitors to our EHR allows for uploading of thousands of heart rates per patient per week, including many abnormally low and high rates. Physician informaticists expressed concern that physicians and their patients might be unaware of abnormal heart rates, including those caused by treatable pathology.

Objective This study aimed to develop a protocol to address millions of unreviewed heart rates.

Methods As a quality improvement initiative, we assembled a physician informaticist team to meet monthly for review of abnormally low and high heart rates. By incorporating other data already present in the EHR, lessons learned from reviewing records over time, and from contacting physicians, we iteratively refined our protocol.

Results We developed (1) a heart rate visualization dashboard to identify concerning heart rates; (2) experience regarding which combinations of heart rates and EHR data were most clinically worrisome, as opposed to representing artifact; (3) a protocol whereby only concerning heart rates would trigger a cardiologist review revealing protected health information; and (4) a generalizable framework for addressing other PAIDA.

Conclusion We expect most PAIDA to eventually require systematic integration and oversight. Our governance framework can help guide future efforts, especially for cases with large amounts of data and where abnormal values may represent concerning but treatable pathology.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was approved by Cedars-Sinai Institutional Review Board.




Publication History

Received: 24 March 2020

Accepted: 05 August 2020

Article published online:
14 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • References

  • 1 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Conceptualizing a Data Infrastructure for the Capture, Use, and Sharing of Patient-Generated Health Data in Care Delivery and Research through 2024: Draft White Paper for a PGHD Policy Framework. 2016
  • 2 Mafi JN, Gerard M, Chimowitz H, Anselmo M, Delbanco T, Walker J. Patients contributing to their doctors' notes: Insights from expert interviews. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168 (04) 302-305
  • 3 Patel V, Johnson C. Individuals' use of online medical records and technology for health needs. Accessed August 20, 2020 at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/page/2018-04/HINTS-2017-Consumer-Data-Brief-april-2018.pdf
  • 4 Redelmeier DA, Kraus NC. Patterns in patient access and utilization of online medical records: analysis of MyChart. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (02) e43
  • 5 Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst 2014; 2: 3
  • 6 Meet today's healthcare team: patients + doctors + machines: Accenture 2018 Consumer Survey on Digital Health in Australia. Accessed August 20, 2020 at: https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-84/accenture-health-meet-todays-healthcare-team-patients-doctors-machines.pdf
  • 7 Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H. Apple Heart Study Investigators. et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2019; 381 (20) 1909-1917
  • 8 Hodge B. The use of symptom diaries in outpatient care. Fam Pract Manag 2013; 20 (03) 24-28
  • 9 Clarke SF, Foster JR. A history of blood glucose meters and their role in self-monitoring of diabetes mellitus. Br J Biomed Sci 2012; 69 (02) 83-93
  • 10 Pevnick JM, Fuller G, Duncan R, Spiegel BM. A large-scale initiative inviting patients to share personal fitness tracker data with their providers: initial results. PLoS One 2016; 11 (11) e0165908
  • 11 Gulati M, Shaw LJ, Thisted RA, Black HR, Bairey Merz CN, Arnsdorf MF. Heart rate response to exercise stress testing in asymptomatic women: the st. James women take heart project. Circulation 2010; 122 (02) 130-137
  • 12 Wang R, Blackburn G, Desai M. et al. Accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2 (01) 104-106
  • 13 Woods SS, Evans NC, Frisbee KL. Integrating patient voices into health information for self-care and patient-clinician partnerships: Veterans Affairs design recommendations for patient-generated data applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (03) 491-495