CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2021; 18(01): 38-44
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717214
Original Article

Traumatic Brain Injury: Effect of Litigation Status on Executive Functioning—A Pilot Study

Simi Prakash K.
1   Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Karnataka, India
,
2   Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Karnataka, India
,
3   Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Karnataka, India
,
Jamuna Rajeswaran
3   Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Karnataka, India
,
Dhaval P. Shukla
4   Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with a wide range of physiological, behavioral, emotional, and cognitive sequelae. Litigation status is one of the many factors that has an impact on recovery. The aim of this study was to compare executive functions, postconcussion, and depressive symptoms in TBI patients with and without litigation. A sample of 30 patients with TBI, 15 patients with litigation (medicolegal case [MLC]), and 15 without litigation (non-MLC) was assessed. The tools used were sociodemographic and clinical proforma, executive function tests, Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire, and Beck Depression Inventory. Assessment revealed that more than 50% of patients showed deficits in category fluency, set shifting, and concept formation. The MLC group showed significant impairment on verbal working memory in comparison to the non-MLC group. The performance of both groups was comparable on tests of semantic fluency, visuospatial working memory, concept formation, set shifting, planning, and response inhibition. The MLC group showed more verbal working memory deficits in the absence of significant postconcussion and depressive symptoms on self-report measures.



Publication History

Article published online:
05 October 2020

© 2020. Neurotrauma Society of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Rabinowitz AR, Levin HS. Cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2014; 37 (01) 1-11
  • 2 Podell K, Gifford K, Bougakov D, Goldberg E. Neuropsychological assessment in traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2010; 33 (04) 855-876
  • 3 Alexander MP. Mild traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management. Neurology 1995; 45 (07) 1253-1260
  • 4 Hart T, Hoffman JM, Pretz C, Kennedy R, Clark AN, Brenner LA. A longitudinal study of major and minor depression following traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93 (08) 1343-1349
  • 5 Galgano M, Toshkezi G, Qiu X, Russell T, Chin L, Zhao LR. Traumatic brain injury: current treatment strategies and future endeavors. Cell Transplant 2017; 26 (07) 1118-1130
  • 6 Sigurdardotti S, Andelic N, Wehling E. et al. Neuropsychological functioning in a national cohort of severe traumatic brain injury: demographic and acute injury related predictors. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2015; 30 (02) 1-12
  • 7 Metting Z, Spikman JM, Rödiger LA, van der Naalt J. Cerebral perfusion and neuropsychological follow up in mild traumatic brain injury: acute versus chronic disturbances?. Brain Cogn 2014; 86: 24-31
  • 8 Barker-Collo S, Jones K, Theadom A. et al. BIONIC Research Group. Neuropsychological outcome and its correlates in the first year after adult mild traumatic brain injury: a population-based New Zealand study. Brain Inj 2015; 29 (13-14) 1604-1616
  • 9 Fasli Sidheek KP. Neuropsychological functioning, social cognition and emotion perception in traumatic brain injury (MPhil. Dissertation). Bengaluru, India: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences; 2014
  • 10 Konrad C, Geburek AJ, Rist F. et al. Long-term cognitive and emotional consequences of mild traumatic brain injury. Psychol Med 2011; 41 (06) 1197-1211
  • 11 Dikmen SS, Corrigan JD, Levin HS, Machamer J, Stiers W, Weisskopf MG. Cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2009; 24 (06) 430-438
  • 12 Binder LM, Rohling ML, Larrabee GJ. A review of mild head trauma. Part I: meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997a; 19 (03) 421-431
  • 13 Binder LM. A review of mild head trauma. Part II: clinical implications. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997b; 19 (03) 432-457
  • 14 Frencham KAR, Fox AM, Maybery MT. Neuropsychological studies of mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analytic review of research since 1995. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2005; 27 (03) 334-351
  • 15 Subrahmanyam BV, Agrawal A. Medico-legal issues in patients of traumatic brain: Indian perspective. Indian J Neurotrauma 2012; 9 (02) 117-122
  • 16 Tsanadis J, Montoya E, Hanks RA, Millis SR, Fichtenberg NL, Axelrod BN. Brain injury severity, litigation status, and self-report of postconcussive symptoms. Clin Neuropsychol 2008; 22 (06) 1080-1092
  • 17 Woods DL, Wyma JM, Herron TJ, Yund EW. The effects of aging, malingering, and traumatic brain injury on computerized trail-making test performance. PLoS One 2015; 10 (06) e0124345
  • 18 Matsuzawa YK, Dijkers MP. The experience of litigation after TBI. I: barriers to recovery. Psychol Inj Law 2014a; 7: 388-396
  • 19 Matsuzawa YK, Dijkers MP. The experience of litigation after TBI. II: coping with litigation after TBI. Psychol Inj Law 2014b; 8: 88-93
  • 20 Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995: 611
  • 21 Smith EE, Jonides J. Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science 1999; 283 (5408) 1657-1661
  • 22 Milner B. Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. Br Med Bull 1971; 27 (03) 272-277
  • 23 Shallice T. Specific impairments of planning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1982; 298 (1089) 199-209
  • 24 Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtiss G. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual-Revised and Expanded. Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; 1993
  • 25 Rao SL, Subbakrishna DK, Gopakumar K. NIMHANS Neuropsychology Battery. Bangalore: NIMHANS Publication; 2004
  • 26 King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NEG, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol 1995; 242 (09) 587-592
  • 27 Beck AT, Steer RA. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 1993
  • 28 Troyer AK, Moscovitch M, Winocur G. Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology 1997; 11 (01) 138-146
  • 29 Busch RM, McBride A, Curtiss G, Vanderploeg RD. The components of executive functioning in traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2005; 27 (08) 1022-1032
  • 30 Vanderploeg RD, Curtiss G, Belanger HG. Long-term neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2005; 11 (03) 228-236
  • 31 Pennington BF, Ozonoff S. Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1996; 37 (01) 51-87
  • 32 Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM. et al. WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36 (Suppl. 43) 84-105
  • 33 Lees-Haley PR, Brown RS. Neuropsychological complaint base rates of 170 personal injury claimants. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1993; 8 (03) 203-209
  • 34 McAllister TW, Flashman LA, McDonald BC, Saykin AJ. Mechanisms of working memory dysfunction after mild and moderate TBI: evidence from functional MRI and neurogenetics. (Abstract). J Neurotrauma 2006; 23 (10) 1450-1467
  • 35 McAllister TW. Neurobiological consequences of traumatic brain injury. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011; 13 (03) 287-300
  • 36 Ponsford J, Willmott C, Rothwell A. et al. Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2000; 6 (05) 568-579
  • 37 King NS. Post-concussion syndrome: clarity amid the controversy?. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 183 (04) 276-278
  • 38 Dean PJA, Sterr A. Long-term effects of mild traumatic brain injury on cognitive performance. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 30
  • 39 Channon S, Green PSS. Executive function in depression: the role of performance strategies in aiding depressed and non-depressed participants. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66 (02) 162-171
  • 40 Hartlage S, Alloy LB, Vázquez C, Dykman B. Automatic and effortful processing in depression. Psychol Bull 1993; 113 (02) 247-278