CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2021; 04(01): 024-027
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718250
Original Article

Should We Report Incidental Low-Density Liver Lesions with Benign Features? A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis of Trauma CT Scans

Bob Zhang
1   Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
1   Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Maryam Shekarforoush
1   Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
1   Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2   Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
3   National Trauma Research Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
› Institutsangaben
Funding None.


Background Many incidental liver lesions are benign and require no additional workup. Investigation of such lesions can have a negative impact of both the patient and health care system. However, the impact of how radiologists report these incidental lesions is not clear. We aimed to investigate how reporting of incidental liver lesions on trauma computed tomography (CT) scan affects follow-up.

Methods This is a retrospective single-center analysis of body CT scans performed following abdominal trauma. Information was collected on the reporting of incidental low-density liver lesions and any additional imaging performed.

Results A total of 3,595 trauma body CT scan reports were reviewed. Incidental liver lesions were identified in 527 (15%) patients, with 347 (10%) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Additional imaging was requested by the referring doctor for 43 out of 285 patients (15%) when lesions were mentioned in the body of the report only, compared with 41 out of 62 patients (66%) when mentioned in the conclusion (odds ratio [OR] = 10.99, p < 0.0001). When additional imaging was recommended in the report, follow-up was arranged for 36 out of 52 patients (69%), compared with 48 out of 285 patients (16%) when it was not suggested (OR = 11.58, p < 0.0001). Additional imaging was requested for 84 of the 347 patients (24%), with 24 of these performed at our institution. All patients followed-up at our institution were diagnosed with a benign lesion.

Conclusion Reporting incidental hypodense liver lesions in the conclusion or specifically recommending further additional imaging, both led to significantly increased likelihood of additional imaging being performed. Radiologists who encounter such lesions should consider excluding them from the conclusion if there are no malignant features or patient risk factors.


Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Oktober 2020

© 2020. Indian Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

  • References

  • 1 Barrett TW, Schierling M, Zhou C. et al. Prevalence of incidental findings in trauma patients detected by computed tomography imaging. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27 (04) 428-435
  • 2 Munk MD, Peitzman AB, Hostler DP, Wolfson AB. Frequency and follow-up of incidental findings on trauma computed tomography scans: experience at a level one trauma center. J Emerg Med 2010; 38 (03) 346-350
  • 3 Sierink JC, Saltzherr TP, Russchen MJ. et al. Incidental findings on total-body CT scans in trauma patients. Injury 2014; 45 (05) 840-844
  • 4 Paluska TR, Sise MJ, Sack DI, Sise CB, Egan MC, Biondi M. Incidental CT findings in trauma patients: incidence and implications for care of the injured. J Trauma 2007; 62 (01) 157-161
  • 5 Hoffstetter P, Herold T, Daneschnejad M. et al. [Non-trauma-associated additional findings in whole-body CT examinations in patients with multiple trauma] (in German). RoFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 2008; 180 (02) 120-126
  • 6 Andrawes P, Picon AI, Shariff MA. et al. CT scan incidental findings in trauma patients: does it impact hospital length of stay?. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2017; 2 (01) e000101
  • 7 Kuan LL, Mavilakandy A, Oyebola T, Bhardwaj N, Dennison AR, Garcea G. Indeterminate liver lesions - a virtual epidemic: a cohort study over 8 years. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90 (05) 791-795
  • 8 Collin P, Rinta-Kiikka I, Räty S, Laukkarinen J, Sand J. Diagnostic workup of liver lesions: too long time with too many examinations. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50 (03) 355-359
  • 9 Kaltenbach TE, Engler P, Kratzer W. et al. Prevalence of benign focal liver lesions: ultrasound investigation of 45,319 hospital patients. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41 (01) 25-32
  • 10 Kumada K, Murakami N, Okada H, Toyoda I, Ogura S, Asano T. Incidental findings on whole-body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system. Acute Med Surg 2019; 6 (03) 274-278
  • 11 Gore RM, Pickhardt PJ, Mortele KJ. et al. Management of incidental liver lesions on ct: a White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14 (11) 1429-1437
  • 12 DiPiro PJ, Alper DP, Giess CS. et al. Comparing breast and abdominal subspecialists’ follow-up recommendations for incidental liver lesions on breast MRI. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17 (06) 773-778
  • 13 Knox M, Slanetz P, Phillips J. et al. Incidental liver lesions seen on Breast MRI: When is additional imaging warranted?. Eur J Radiol 2017; 95: 319-324