PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(05): 755-763
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718753
State of the Art/Best Practice Paper

Ethical Considerations on Pediatric Genetic Testing Results in Electronic Health Records

Shibani Kanungo
1   Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
,
Jayne Barr
2   Internal Medicine-Pediatrics, MetroHealth, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
,
Parker Crutchfield
3   Medical Ethics, Humanities, and Law, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
,
Casey Fealko
1   Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
,
Neelkamal Soares
1   Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Advances in technology and access to expanded genetic testing have resulted in more children and adolescents receiving genetic testing for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. With increased adoption of the electronic health record (EHR), genetic testing is increasingly resulted in the EHR. However, this leads to challenges in both storage and disclosure of genetic results, particularly when parental results are combined with child genetic results.

Privacy and Ethical Considerations Accidental disclosure and erroneous documentation of genetic results can occur due to the nature of their presentation in the EHR and documentation processes by clinicians. Genetic information is both sensitive and identifying, and requires a considered approach to both timing and extent of disclosure to families and access to clinicians.

Methods This article uses an interdisciplinary approach to explore ethical issues surrounding privacy, confidentiality of genetic data, and access to genetic results by health care providers and family members, and provides suggestions in a stakeholder format for best practices on this topic for clinicians and informaticians. Suggestions are made for clinicians on documenting and accessing genetic information in the EHR, and on collaborating with genetics specialists and disclosure of genetic results to families. Additional considerations for families including ethics around results of adolescents and special scenarios for blended families and foster minors are also provided. Finally, administrators and informaticians are provided best practices on both institutional processes and EHR architecture, including security and access control, with emphasis on the minimum necessary paradigm and parent/patient engagement and control of the use and disclosure of data.

Conclusion The authors hope that these best practices energize specialty societies to craft practice guidelines on genetic information management in the EHR with interdisciplinary input that addresses all stakeholder needs.

Keywords

ethics - privacy - confidentiality - children - genetic testing - electronic health record

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

No human subjects were involved in the preparation of this manuscript.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. Juni 2020

Angenommen: 08. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Cohen E, Kuo DZ, Agrawal R. et al. Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (03) 529-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Oei K, Hayeems RZ, Ungar WJ, Cohn RD, Cohen E. Genetic Testing among Children in a Complex Care Program. Children (Basel) 2017; 4 (05) 42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Manolio TA, Abramowicz M, Al-Mulla F. et al. Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not alone. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7 (290) 290ps13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wetterstrand KA. DNA Sequencing Costs: Data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP). Available at: www.genome.gov/sequencingcostsdata. Accessed April 14, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Manning M, Hudgins L. Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med 2010; 12 (11) 742-745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Behjati S, Tarpey PS. What is next generation sequencing?. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2013; 98 (06) 236-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 2013; 15 (07) 565-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS. et al. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 97 (01) 6-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hardin AP, Hackell JM. COMMITTEE ON PRACTICE AND AMBULATORY MEDICINE. Age limit of pediatrics. Pediatrics 2017; 140 (03) e20172151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. 18001. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ppacacon.pdf. Accessed 2010
    PubMed
  • 11 Grace AM, Horn I, Hall R, Cheng TL. Children, Families, and Disparities: Pediatric Provisions in the Affordable Care Act. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015; 62 (05) 1297-1311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Pub. L. 104–191. Stat. 1936. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-104publ191/pdf/PLAW-104publ191.pdf. Accessed August 21, 1996
    PubMed
  • 13 US Dept. of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, Personal Health Records and the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/special/healthit/phrs.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2020
    PubMed
  • 14 Harman LB, Flite CA, Bond K. Electronic health records: privacy, confidentiality, and security. Virtual Mentor 2012; 14 (09) 712-719
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bilimoria NM. HIPAA privacy/security rules: where we've been and where we are going. Updates from the HITECH Act to dramatically impact HIPAA privacy/security. J Med Pract Manage 2009; 25 (03) 149-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Walsh T, Dougherty M. The 10 security domains (updated). J AHIMA 2012; 83 (05) 48-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Health IT Dashboard. Available at: https://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/quickstats.php. Accessed April 5, 2020
    PubMed
  • 18 Jiang JX, Bai G. Evaluation of causes of protected health information breaches. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179 (02) 265-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, 21st Century Cures Act: interoperability, information blocking, and the ONC Health IT Certification Program, Final Rule. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-05-01/pdf/2020-07419.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2020
    PubMed
  • 20 The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Health IT for Pediatric Care and Practice Settings. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/health-it-pediatric-care-and-practice-settings. Accessed August 1, 2020
    PubMed
  • 21 Greene AH. HHS steps up HIPAA audits. J AHIMA 2011; 82 (10) 58-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, Quintero-Rivera F, South ST. Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med 2011; 13 (07) 680-685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Darcy DC, Lewis ET, Ormond KE, Clark DJ, Trafton JA. Practical considerations to guide development of access controls and decision support for genetic information in electronic medical records. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hazin R, Brothers KB, Malin BA. et al. Ethical, legal, and social implications of incorporating genomic information into electronic health records. Genet Med 2013; 15 (10) 810-816
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lantos JD. Ethical and psychosocial issues in whole genome sequencing (WGS) for newborns. Pediatrics 2019; 143 (Suppl. 01) S1-S5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bowdin SC, Hayeems RZ, Monfared N, Cohn RD, Meyn MS. The SickKids Genome Clinic: developing and evaluating a pediatric model for individualized genomic medicine. Clin Genet 2016; 89 (01) 10-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Murry JB, Machini K. BabySeq Project Team. et al. Interpretation of genomic sequencing results in healthy and ill newborns: results from the BabySeq Project. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 104 (01) 76-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Health Level Seven International, HL7 Version 2.5.1 implementation guide: laboratory orders from EHR (LOI). Published 2018. Available at: https://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/standards/dstu/V251_IG_LABORDERS_R1_STU_R3_2018JUN.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2020
    PubMed
  • 29 Cuvo JB, Dinh AK, Fahrenholz CG. et al. Quality data and documentation for EHRs in physician practice. J AHIMA 2008; 79 (08) 43-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Swaminathan R, Huang Y, Astbury C. et al. Clinical exome sequencing reports: current informatics practice and future opportunities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (06) 1184-1191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shirts BH, Salama JS, Aronson SJ. et al. CSER and eMERGE: current and potential state of the display of genetic information in the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (06) 1231-1242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Eno CC, Barton SK, Dorrani N, Cederbaum SD, Deignan JL, Grody WW. Confidential genetic testing and electronic health records: a survey of current practices among Huntington disease testing centers. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8 (01) e1026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Klitzman R. Exclusion of genetic information from the medical record: ethical and medical dilemmas. JAMA 2010; 304 (10) 1120-1121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. Available at: https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-2008. Accessed 2008
    PubMed
  • 35 Clayton EW. Why the americans with disabilities act matters for genetics. JAMA 2015; 313 (22) 2225-2226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Clayton EW, Evans BJ, Hazel JW, Rothstein MA. The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations. J Law Biosci 2019; 6 (01) 1-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Carroll JC, Allanson J, Morrison S. et al. Informing integration of genomic medicine into primary care: an assessment of current practice, attitudes, and desired resources. Front Genet 2019; 10: 1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA. Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 2015; 17 (03) 169-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Organ Transplant Discrimination Against People with Disabilities: Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series, National Council on Disability. Available at: https://ncd.gov/sites/default/files/NCD_Organ_Transplant_508.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2019
    PubMed
  • 40 Sankar P, Cho MK, Wolpe PR, Schairer C. What is in a cause? Exploring the relationship between genetic cause and felt stigma. Genet Med 2006; 8 (01) 33-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Murray T. Genetic exceptionalism and “future diaries”: is genetic information different from other medical information?. In: Rothstein M. , ed. Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1997: 60-73
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Garrison NA, Brothers KB, Goldenberg AJ, Lynch JA. Genomic contextualism: shifting the rhetoric of genetic exceptionalism. Am J Bioeth 2019; 19 (01) 51-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Grootens-Wiegers P, Hein IM, van den Broek JM, de Vries MC. Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects. BMC Pediatr 2017; 17 (01) 120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Klostermann BK, Slap GB, Nebrig DM, Tivorsak TL, Britto MT. Earning trust and losing it: adolescents' views on trusting physicians. J Fam Pract 2005; 54 (08) 679-687
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 McGowan ML, Prows CA, DeJonckheere M, Brinkman WB, Vaughn L, Myers MF. Adolescent and parental attitudes about return of genomic research results: focus group findings regarding decisional preferences. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13 (04) 371-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Pervola J, Myers MF, McGowan ML, Prows CA. Giving adolescents a voice: the types of genetic information adolescents choose to learn and why. Genet Med 2019; 21 (04) 965-971
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Classen DC, Mermel LA. Specialty society clinical practice guidelines: time for evolution or revolution?. JAMA 2015; 314 (09) 871-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Maslyanskaya S, Alderman EM. Confidentiality and consent in the care of the adolescent patient. Pediatr Rev 2019; 40 (10) 508-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Leventhal JC, Cummins JA, Schwartz PH, Martin DK, Tierney WM. Designing a system for patients controlling providers' access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (01) (Suppl. 01) S17-S24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Guttmacher AE, Porteous ME, McInerney JD. Educating health-care professionals about genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8 (02) 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Esch T, Mejilla R, Anselmo M, Podtschaske B, Delbanco T, Walker J. Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (01) e010034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Fisher B, Bhavnani V, Winfield M. How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice. J R Soc Med 2009; 102 (12) 539-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Davis KA, Smith LB. Ethical considerations about EHR-mediated results disclosure and pathology information presented via patient portals. AMA J Ethics 2016; 18 (08) 826-832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Haga SB, Mills R, Pollak KI. et al. Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding. Genome Med 2014; 6 (07) 58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 David KL, Best RG, Brenman LM. ACMG Social Ethical Legal Issues Committee. et al. Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2019; 21 (04) 769-771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Luo J, Wu M, Gopukumar D, Zhao Y. Big data application in biomedical research and health care: a literature review. Biomed Inform Insights 2016; 8: 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Navarro FCP, Mohsen H, Yan C. et al. Genomics and data science: an application within an umbrella. Genome Biol 2019; 20 (01) 109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Yang J. Cloud computing for storing and analyzing petabytes of genomic data. J Ind Inf Integr 2019; 15: 50-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Walton NA, Johnson DK, Person TN, Chamala S. Genomic data in the electronic health record. Adv Mol Pathol 2019; 2 (01) 21-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Bellazzi R. Big data and biomedical informatics: a challenging opportunity. Yearb Med Inform 2014; 9 (01) 8-13
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Alterovitz G, Warner J, Zhang P. et al. SMART on FHIR genomics: facilitating standardized clinico-genomic apps. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (06) 1173-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Klinkenberg-Ramirez S, Neri PM, Volk LA. et al. Evaluation: a qualitative pilot study of novel information technology infrastructure to communicate genetic variant updates. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 461-476
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Deckard J, McDonald CJ, Vreeman DJ. Supporting interoperability of genetic data with LOINC. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (03) 621-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Uchegbu C, Jing X. The potential adoption benefits and challenges of LOINC codes in a laboratory department: a case study. Health Inf Sci Syst 2017; 5 (01) 6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Stram M, Gigliotti T, Hartman D. et al. Logical observation identifiers names and codes for laboratorians. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 144 (02) 229-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Gajanayake R, Iannella R, Sahama T. Privacy oriented access control for electronic health records. Elect J Health Inform 2014; 8 (02) e15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Lamas E, Barh A, Brown D, Jaulent MC. Ethical, legal and social issues related to the health data-warehouses: re-using health data in the research and public health research. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 210: 719-723
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Ferreira A, Cruz-Correia R, Antunes L, Chadwick D. Access control: how can it improve patients' healthcare?. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 127: 65-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar