PDF herunterladen
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021; 82(02): 147-153
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718758
Original Article

Impact of Obesity on Complication Rates, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Lukas Goertz
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
,
Pantelis Stavrinou
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
,
Christina Hamisch
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
,
Moritz Perrech
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
,
Dierk-Marko Czybulka
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
,
Kaveh Mehdiani
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
,
Marco Timmer
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
,
Roland Goldbrunner
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
,
Boris Krischek
1   Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in obese patients remains a surgical challenge. We aimed to compare patient-reported outcomes and complication rates between obese and nonobese patients who were treated by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).

Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent MIS-TLIF at a single institution between 2011 and 2014. Patients were classified as obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) or nonobese (BMI < 30 kg/m2), according to their BMI. Outcomes assessed were complications, numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) scores.

Results The final study group consisted of 71 patients, 24 obese (33.8%, 34.8 ± 3.8 kg/m2) and 47 nonobese (66.2%, 25.4 ± 2.9 kg/m2). Instrumentation failures (13.6 vs. 17.0%), dural tears (17.2 vs. 4.0%), and revision rates (16.7 vs. 19.1%) were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). Perioperative improvements in back pain (4.3 vs. 5.4, p = 0.07), leg pain (3.8 vs. 4.2, p = 0.6), and ODI (13.3 vs. 22.5, p = 0.5) were comparable among the groups and persisted at long-term follow-up. Obese patients had worse postoperative physical component SF-36 scores than nonobese patients (36.4 vs. 42.7, p = 0.03), while the mental component scores were not statistically different (p = 0.09).

Conclusion Obese patients can achieve similar improvement of the pain intensity and functional status even at long-term follow-up. In patients with appropriate surgical indications, obesity should not be considered a contraindication for MIS-TLIF surgery.

Keywords

percutaneous interbody fusion - minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - MIS-TLIF - obesity - SF-36


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. Oktober 2019

Angenommen: 13. Februar 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Dezember 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization, Obesity and Overweight. Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed September 14, 2019
    PubMed
  • 2 Jain D, Berven S. Effect of obesity on the development, management, and outcomes of spinal disorders. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019; 27 (11) e499-e506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Shiri R, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E. The association between obesity and low back pain: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 171 (02) 135-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Aizawa T, Kokubun S, Ozawa H. et al. Increasing incidence of degenerative spinal diseases in Japan during 25 years: the registration system of spinal surgery in Tohoku University spine society. Tohoku J Exp Med 2016; 238 (02) 153-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 2001; 48 (03) 569-574 , discussion 574–575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2001; 26 (05) 567-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (11) 2265-2270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 2010; 1: 12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (10) 1780-1784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sinha AC, Singh PM. Controversies in perioperative anesthetic management of the morbidly obese: I am a surgeon, why should I care?. Obes Surg 2015; 25 (05) 879-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cole IV JS, Jackson TR. Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in obese patients. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (03) 539-544 , discussion 544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Senker W, Meznik C, Avian A, Berghold A. Perioperative morbidity and complications in minimal access surgery techniques in obese patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (07) 1182-1187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tomasino A, Parikh K, Steinberger J, Knopman J, Boockvar J, Härtl R. Tubular microsurgery for lumbar discectomies and laminectomies in obese patients: operative results and outcome. Spine 2009; 34 (18) E664-E672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yoo M-W, Hyun S-J, Kim K-J, Jahng T-A, Kim H-J. Does obesity make an influence on surgical outcomes following lumbar microdiscectomy?. Korean J Spine 2014; 11 (02) 68-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Djurasovic M, Bratcher KR, Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Carreon LY. The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion. Spine 2008; 33 (16) 1789-1792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 De la Garza-Ramos R, Bydon M, Abt NB. et al. The impact of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes after lumbar fusion. Spine 2015; 40 (01) 56-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jiang J, Teng Y, Fan Z, Khan S, Xia Y. Does obesity affect the surgical outcome and complication rates of spinal surgery? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (03) 968-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18: S1-S6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000; 25 (22) 2940-2952 , discussion 2952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Doll HA, Petersen SE, Stewart-Brown SL. Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire. Obes Res 2000; 8 (02) 160-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 1990; 15 (01) 11-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Peng CW, Bendo JA, Goldstein JA, Nalbandian MM. Perioperative outcomes of anterior lumbar surgery in obese versus non-obese patients. Spine J 2009; 9 (09) 715-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, Heary RF, Conklin L, Jacobs GB. Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (01) 60-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1999; 24 (10) 1023-1028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tian N-F, Wu Y-S, Zhang X-L, Xu H-Z, Chi Y-L, Mao F-M. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (08) 1741-1749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wu RH, Fraser JF, Härtl R. Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates. Spine 2010; 35 (26) 2273-2281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tan JH, Liu G, Ng R, Kumar N, Wong HK, Liu G. Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2018; 27 (08) 1877-1886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lingutla KK, Pollock R, Benomran E. et al. Outcome of lumbar spinal fusion surgery in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B (10) 1395-1404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Narain AS, Hijji FY, Bohl DD, Yom KH, Kudaravalli KT, Singh K. Is body mass index a risk factor for revision procedures after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?. Clin Spine Surg 2018; 31 (01) E85-E91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Krüger MT, Naseri Y, Hohenhaus M, Hubbe U, Scholz C, Klingler JH. Impact of morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2) on complication rate and outcome following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 178: 82-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lau D, Khan A, Terman SW, Yee T, La Marca F, Park P. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35 (02) E10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Terman SW, Yee TJ, Lau D, Khan AA, La Marca F, Park P. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 20 (06) 644-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Adogwa O, Carr K, Thompson P. et al. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?. World Neurosurg 2015; 83 (05) 860-866
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Goh GS, Liow MHL, Yeo W. et al. The influence of body mass index on functional outcomes, satisfaction and return to work after single-level minimally-invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a five-year follow-up study. Spine 2019; 44 (11) 809-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar