CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2020; 4(03): 167-174
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718790
Original Article

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Interventional Radiology Practice—A Multicenter Observational Study

Mathew Cherian
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, KMCH Hospital, Coimbatore, India
,
Pankaj Mehta
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, KMCH Hospital, Coimbatore, India
,
Sitaram Barath
2   Department of Interventional Radiology, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, India
,
Manish Yadav
3   Department of Interventional Radiology, KIMS Hospital, Trivandrum, India
,
Muthurajan Pandi
4   Department of Interventional Radiology, Ramakrishna Hospital, Coimbatore, India
,
Saurabh Joshi
5   Department of Interventional Radiology, Vein Center, Mumbai, India
,
Rahul Kareparambil Ranasingh
6   Department of Interventional Radiology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, India
,
Akhil Monga
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, KMCH Hospital, Coimbatore, India
,
Karthikeyan Muthugounder Athiyappan
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, KMCH Hospital, Coimbatore, India
,
Nikhil Handihal Reddy
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, KMCH Hospital, Coimbatore, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented challenges to health care services including interventional radiology (IR). Treating COVID-19 infected patients became a priority; furthermore, government policies of differing elective procedures and the public’s fear of contacting COVID-19 have impacted IR workload worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the workflow in six vascular IR centers located across India.

Methods The data were collected retrospectively from April 1 to June 30, 2020. All the six centers were staffed by the alumni of a single parent center located in India. Data was also collected from the same time period in 2019 for comparison.

Results A total of 893 patients were treated from April 1 to June 30, 2019, and 419 were treated during the same period in 2020 during the pandemic, a 53% case volume reduction (95% CI:28. 56–129.44; p < 0.001). The month of April had the largest case volume reduction (66%, 95% CI: 13.57–50.43; p < 0.001). Elective procedures showed an 85% reduction (95% CI: 9.62–91.71; p < 0.001). Venous interventions showed the highest reduction of 76% (95% CI: 0.75–67.75; p < 0.001). Neurological emergencies, dialysis-related interventions, and nonvascular procedures did not show a significant change. No patient tested positive for COVID-19 prior to the procedure; however, one patient who was treated emergently was found to be positive later.

Conclusion COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted IR practice across India. Workload reduction was more profound at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic with a gradual improvement over time.



Publication History

Article published online:
24 December 2020

© 2020. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Wu Y, Ho W, Huang Y. et al. SARS-CoV-2 is an appropriate name for the new coronavirus. Lancet 2020; 395 (10228) 949-950
  • 2 Zhou F, Yu T, Du R. et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395 (10229) 1054-1062
  • 3 Carenzo L, Costantini E, Greco M. et al. Hospital surge capacity in a tertiary emergency referral centre during the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Anaesthesia 2020; 75 (07) 928-934
  • 4 Boccia S, Ricciardi W, Ioannidis JPA. what other countries can learn from Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180 (07) 927-928
  • 5 Charalel RA, McGinty G, Brant-Zawadzki M. et al. IR delivers high-value health care and is an Imaging 3.0 vanguard. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12: 501-506
  • 6 Chandy PE, Nasir MU, Srinivasan S, Klass D, Nicolaou S, Babu SB. IR and COVID-19: evidence based measures to limit transmission. Diagn Interv Radiol 2020; 26: 236-240
  • 7 Zhu HD, Zeng CH, Lu J, Teng GJ. COVID-19: what should interventional radiologists know and what can they do?. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (06) 876-881
  • 8 Ierardi AM, Wood BJ, Gaudino C. et al. How to handle a COVID-19 patient in the angiographic suite. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43 (06) 820-826
  • 9 Hoe Gan W, Wah Lim J, Koh D. Preventing intra-hospital infection and transmission of COVID-19 in healthcare workers. Saf Health Work 2020; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.001.
  • 10 Society of IR - Covid-19 case classification. Available at: https://www.sirweb.org/practice-resources/toolkits/covid-19-toolkit/covid-19-case-classification/. Accessed September 23, 2020
  • 11 Prokop M, van Everdingen W, van Rees Vellinga T. et al. COVID-19 Standardized Reporting Working Group of the Dutch Radiological Society. CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation. Radiology 2020; 296 (02) E97-E104
  • 12 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Directorate General of Health Services [Emergency Medical Relief] Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Guidelines on Rational use of Personal Protective Equipment. Available at: http://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/GuidelinesonrationaluseofPersonalProtectiveEquipment.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2020
  • 13 Gogna A, Punamiya S, Gopinathan A. et al. Preparing IR for COVID-19: The Singapore Experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (06) 869-875
  • 14 Iezzi R, Valente I, Cina A. et al. Longitudinal study of IR activity in a large metropolitan Italian tertiary care hospital: how the COVID-19 pandemic emergency has changed our activity. Eur Radiol 2020; (e-pub ahead of print). DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07041-y.
  • 15 Roda WC, Varughese MB, Han D, Li MY. Why is it difficult to accurately predict the COVID-19 epidemic?. Infect Dis Model 2020; 5: 271-281
  • 16 Da Zhuang K, Tan BS, Tan BH, Too CW, Tay KH. Oldthreat, new enemy: is your IR service readyfor the coronavirus disease 2019?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43: 665-666
  • 17 Pedicelli A, Valente I, Pilato F, Distefano M, Colosimo C. Stroke priorities during COVID-19 outbreak: acting both fast and safe. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29 (08) 104922
  • 18 Ma QX, Shan H, Zhang HL, Li GM, Yang RM, Chen JM. Potential utilities of mask-wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2. J Med Virol 2020; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25805.
  • 19 Nicola M, O’Neill N, Sohrabi C, Khan M, Agha M, Agha R. Evidence based management guideline for the COVID-19 pandemic - Review article. Int J Surg 2020; 77: 206-216
  • 20 World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease (COVID - 19) World Health Organization – Interim Guidance. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331215/WHO-2019-nCov-IPCPPE_Use-2020.1-eng.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2020