RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719145
Residual Disease after Operative Hysteroscopy in Patients with Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Associated with Polyps
Doença residual após histeroscopia cirúrgica em pacientes com câncer de endométrio endometrioide associado a pólipo endometrialAbstract
Objective To evaluate the presence of residual disease in the uterine specimen after hysteroscopic polypectomy or polyp biopsy in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC).
Methods We analyzed a series of 104 patients (92 cases from the Hospital AC Camargo and 12 from the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo) with polyps that were diagnosed by hysteroscopy, showing endometrioid EC associated with the polyp or in the final pathological specimen. Patients underwent a surgical approach for endometrial cancer from January 2002 to January 2017. Their clinical and pathological data were retrospectively retrieved from the medical records.
Results In 78 cases (75%), the polyp had EC, and in 40 (38.5%), it was restricted to the polyp, without endometrial involvement. The pathologic stage was IA in 96 cases (92.3%) and 90 (86.5%) had histologic grade 1 or 2. In 18 cases (17.3%), there was no residual disease in the final uterine specimen, but only in 9 of them the hysteroscopy suggested that the tumor was restricted to the polyp. In 5 cases (4.8%) from the group without disease outside of the polyp during hysteroscopy, myometrial invasion was noted in the final uterine specimen. This finding suggests the possibility of disease extrapolation through the base of the polyp.
Conclusion Patients with endometrioid EC associated with polyps may have the tumor completely removed during hysteroscopy, but the variables shown in the present study could not safely predict which patient would have no residual disease.
Resumo
Objetivo Avaliar a presença de doença residual no exame anatomopatológico definitivo de pacientes com câncer de endométrio endometrioide após polipectomia ou biópsia de pólipo histeroscópica.
Métodos Analisamos 104 pacientes (92 casos do Hospital AC Camargo e 12 casos do Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo) com pólipos diagnosticados durante histeroscopia e cuja biópsia histeroscópica ou exame patológico final do útero acusaram câncer de endométrio endometrioide. As pacientes foram submetidas a cirurgia para câncer de endométrio de janeiro de 2002 a janeiro de 2017. Os dados clínicos e anatomopatológicos de cada paciente foram retirados dos prontuários médicos
Resultados Em 78 casos (75%), o pólipo continha a neoplasia, e em 40 (38.5%), ela estava restrita ao tecido do pólipo, sem envolvimento endometrial adjacente. O estadio final foi IA em 96 casos (92.3%) e em 90 (86.5%) tratava-se de grau 1 ou 2. Em 18 casos (17.3%), não havia doença residual no espécime uterino, mas em apenas 9 deles a histeroscopia sugeriu doença restrita ao pólipo. Em 5 casos (4.8%), não havia doença aparente extrapólipo na histeroscopia, mas havia invasão miometrial, sugerindo extravasamento do tumor pela base do pólipo.
Conclusão Pacientes com câncer de endométrio associado a pólipos podem ter o tumor completamente removido durante a histeroscopia, mas, com as variáveis avaliadas, é difícil predizer com segurança qual paciente ficará sem tumor residual.
Contributions
Study concepts: Simonsen M. and Baiocchi Neto G. Study design: Simonsen M. and Baiocchi Neto G. Data acquisition: Simonsen M., Mantoan H., Faloppa C. C., Kumagai L. Y., Badiglian-Filho L., Machado A. G., Tayfour N. M., Baiocchi Neto G. Quality control of data and algorithms: Mantoan H., Faloppa C. C., Kumagai L. Y., Badiglian-Filho L., Machado A. G., Tayfour N. M. Data analysis and interpretation: Simonsen M. and Baiocchi Neto G. Statistical analysis: Simonsen M. and Baiocchi Neto G. Manuscript preparation: Simonsen M. and Baiocchi Neto G. Manuscript editing: Simonsen M. and Baiocchi Neto G. Manuscript review: Simonsen M., Mantoan H., Faloppa C. C., Kumagai L. Y., Badiglian-Filho L., Machado A. G., Tayfour N. M., Baiocchi Neto G.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 26. Februar 2020
Angenommen: 14. September 2020
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Januar 2021
© 2021. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Perri T, Rahimi K, Ramanakumar AV, Wou K, Pilavdzic D, Franco EL. et al. Are endometrial polyps true cancer precursors?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (03) 232.e1-232.e6
- 2 Farrell R, Scurry J, Otton G, Hacker NF. Clinicopathologic review of malignant polyps in stage 1A carcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 98 (02) 254-262
- 3 Dias DS, Bueloni-Dias FN, Dias R, Nahás-Neto J, Nahás EAP, Leite NJ. et al. Usefulness of clinical, ultrasonographic, hysteroscopic, and immunohistochemical parameters in differentiating endometrial polyps from endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21 (02) 296-302
- 4 Antunes Jr A, Costa-Paiva L, Arthuso M, Costa JV, Pinto-Neto AM. Endometrial polyps in pre- and postmenopausal women: factors associated with malignancy. Maturitas 2007; 57 (04) 415-421
- 5 Mittal K, Da Costa D. Endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma in endometrial polyps: clinicopathologic and follow-up findings. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2008; 27 (01) 45-48
- 6 Gambadauro P, Martínez-Maestre MA, Schneider J, Torrejón R. Malignant and premalignant changes in the endometrium of women with an ultrasound diagnosis of endometrial polyp. J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 34 (07) 611-615
- 7 de Rijk SR, Steenbergen ME, Nieboer TE, Coppus SF. Atypical endometrial polyps and concurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (03) 519-525
- 8 Pivano A, Crochet P, Carcopino X, Cravello L, Boubli L, Agostini A. Risk of coexisting endometrial carcinoma in case of atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosed on total hysteroscopic resection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 203: 210-213
- 9 Ouyang C, Frimer M, Hou LY, Wang Y, Goldberg GL, Hou JY. Malignant endometrial polyps in uterine serous carcinoma: the prognostic value of polyp size and lymphovascular invasion. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28 (03) 524-528
- 10 Chang-Halpenny CN, Natarajan S, Hwang-Graziano J. Early stage papillary serous or clear cell carcinoma confined to or involving an endometrial polyp: outcomes with and without adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 131 (03) 598-603
- 11 Ben-Arie A, Goldchmit C, Laviv Y, Levy R, Caspi B, Huszar M. et al. The malignant potential of endometrial polyps. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115 (02) 206-210
- 12 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines for treatment of cancer by site: Uterine neoplasms: NCCN guidelines [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf
- 13 Bakour SH, Khan KS, Gupta JK. The risk of premalignant and malignant pathology in endometrial polyps. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79 (04) 317-320
- 14 Tarney CM, Tian C, Wang G, Dubil EA, Bateman NW, Chan JK. et al. Impact of age at diagnosis on racial disparities in endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149 (01) 12-21
- 15 Sivridis E, Giatromanolaki A. The pathogenesis of endometrial carcinomas at menopause: facts and figures. J Clin Pathol 2011; 64 (07) 553-560
- 16 Gawron I, Łoboda M, Babczyk D, Ludwin I, Basta P, Pityński K, Ludwin A. Endometrial cancer and hyperplasia rate in women before menopause with abnormal uterine bleeding undergoing endometrial sampling. Przegl Lek 2017; 74 (04) 139-143
- 17 Ghoubara A, Emovon E, Sundar S, Ewies A. Thickened endometrium in asymptomatic postmenopausal women - determining an optimum threshold for prediction of atypical hyperplasia and cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 38 (08) 1146-1149
- 18 Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR. et al. Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 16 (02) 170-199
- 19 Baiocchi G, Manci N, Pazzaglia M, Giannone L, Burnelli L, Giannone E. et al. Malignancy in endometrial polyps: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (05) 462.e1-462.e4
- 20 Cohen I. Endometrial polyps in pre-and postmenopausal women: factors associated with malignancy. Maturitas 2008; 59 (01) 99-100
- 21 Gemer O, Segev Y, Helpman L, Hag-Yahia N, Eitan R, Raban O. et al. Is there a survival advantage in diagnosing endometrial cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients? An Israeli Gynecology Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219 (02) 181.e1-181.e6
- 22 Naaman Y, Diment J, Perlman S, Oustinov N, Vaisbuch E, Ben-Arie A. Can malignant potential of endometrial polyps be determined by incorporating the endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) classification?. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136 (02) 254-257
- 23 Trimble CL, Kauderer J, Zaino R, Silverberg S, Lim PC, Burke II JJB. et al. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 2006; 106 (04) 812-819
- 24 Wethington SL, Herzog TJ, Burke WM, Sun X, Lerner JP, Lewin SN, Wright JD. Risk and predictors of malignancy in women with endometrial polyps. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (13) 3819-3823
- 25 Fernández-Parra J, Rodríguez Oliver A, López Criado S, Parrilla Fernández F, Montoya Ventoso F. Hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrial polyps. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 95 (02) 144-148
- 26 Giordano G, Gnetti L, Merisio C, Melpignano M. Postmenopausal status, hypertension and obesity as risk factors for malignant transformation in endometrial polyps. Maturitas 2007; 56 (02) 190-197
- 27 Elyashiv O, Sagiv R, Kerner R, Keidar R, Menczer J, Levy T. Hysterscopic resection of premalignant and malignant endometrial polyps: is it a safe alternative to hysterectomy?. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24 (07) 1200-1203
- 28 Vilos GA, Edris F, Al-Mubarak A, Ettler HC, Hollett-Caines J, Abu-Rafea B. Hysteroscopic surgery does not adversely affect the long-term prognosis of women with endometrial adenocarcinoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14 (02) 205-210
- 29 Salm R. The incidence and significance of early carcinomas in endometrial polyps. J Pathol 1972; 108 (01) 47-53
- 30 Wang F, Yu A, Xu H, Zhang X, Li L, Lou H. et al. Fertility preserved hysteroscopic approach for the treatment of stage Ia endometrioid carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27 (09) 1919-1925
- 31 Spadoto-Dias D, Bueloni-Dias FN, Elias LV, Leite NJ, Modotti WP, Lasmar RB, Dias R. The value of hysteroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. Womens Health (Lond) 2016; 12 (04) 412-419
- 32 Svirsky R, Smorgick N, Rozowski U, Sagiv R, Feingold M, Halperin R, Pansky M. Can we rely on blind endometrial biopsy for detection of focal intrauterine pathology?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (02) 115.e1-115.e3
- 33 Kanthi JM, Remadevi C, Sumathy S, Sharma D, Sreedhar S, Jose A. Clinical study of endometrial polyp and role of diagnostic hysteroscopy and blind avulsion of polyp. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10 (06) QC01-QC04
- 34 Savelli L, De Iaco P, Santini D, Rosati F, Ghi T, Pignotti E, Bovicelli L. Histopathologic features and risk factors for benignity, hyperplasia, and cancer in endometrial polyps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (04) 927-931