J Knee Surg 2022; 35(11): 1236-1241
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722658
Original Article

Assessing the Role of Minimal Medial Tissue Release during Navigation-Assisted Varus Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on the Degree of Preoperative Varus Deformity

Seikai Toyooka
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Hironari Masuda
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Nobuhiro Nishihara
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Wataru Miyamoto
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Takashi Kobayashi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Hirotaka Kawano
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Takumi Nakagawa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

We assessed the impact of a minimal medial soft-tissue release with complete peripheral osteophyte removal on the ability to attain manual preresection deformity correction during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for varus osteoarthritis. We included 131 TKAs for 109 patients with medial compartment predominant osteoarthritis. The steps for achieving minimal medial soft-tissue release were performed as follows: (1) elevation of a periosteal sleeve to 5-mm distal to the joint line and (2) complete removal of peripheral osteophytes. The evaluation criteria of this study were as follows: (1) age, (2) height, (3) weight, (4) body mass index (BMI), (5) sex, (6) the preoperative femorotibial mechanical angle in the neutral position before medial release and (7) the mechanical angle in maximum manual valgus stress after the two-step medial-release procedure (measured on the navigation screens). Multiple regression analysis of the criteria was performed to determine the degree of varus deformity that allowed neutral alignment but required extensive medial release. The femorotibial mechanical angle in the neutral position before medial release and sex correlated with the mechanical angle in maximum manual valgus stress on the navigation screen after medial release (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Based on the regression formula, the maximum degree of preoperative varus deformity that allowed neutral alignment by the minimum medial-release procedure was 5.3 degrees for males and 9.1 degrees for females. The magnitude of deformity which has an impact on the ability to correct varus deformity (by minimal soft-tissue release and complete osteophyte removal) was clarified. If the preoperative degree of varus deformity was within 5.3 degrees for males and 9.1 degrees for females, an extensive medial release was not required to obtain neutral alignment.



Publication History

Received: 15 February 2020

Accepted: 29 November 2020

Article published online:
20 January 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Unitt L, Sambatakakis A, Johnstone D, Briggs TW. Balancer Study Group. Short-term outcome in total knee replacement after soft-tissue release and balancing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (02) 159-165
  • 2 Whiteside LA, Saeki K, Mihalko WM. Functional medical ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (380) 45-57
  • 3 Aunan E, Kibsgård T, Clarke-Jenssen J, Röhrl SM. A new method to measure ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: laxity measurements in 100 knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132 (08) 1173-1181
  • 4 Babazadeh S, Stoney JD, Lim K, Choong PF. The relevance of ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: how important is it? A systematic review of the literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2009; 1 (02) e26
  • 5 King III JJ, Chakravarty R, Cerynik DL, Black A, Johanson NA. Decreased ratios of lateral to medial patellofemoral forces and pressures after lateral retinacular release and gender knees in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (12) 2770-2778
  • 6 Sikorski JM. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (09) 1121-1127
  • 7 Azukizawa M, Kuriyama S, Nakamura S. et al. Intraoperative medial joint laxity in flexion decreases patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018; 138 (08) 1143-1150
  • 8 Ramappa M. Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review. SICOT J 2015; 1: 24
  • 9 Tsukiyama H, Kuriyama S, Kobayashi M. et al. Medial rather than lateral knee instability correlates with inferior patient satisfaction and knee function after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2017; 24 (06) 1478-1484
  • 10 Rossi R, Cottino U, Bruzzone M, Dettoni F, Bonasia DE, Rosso F. Total knee arthroplasty in the varus knee: tips and tricks. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (01) 151-158
  • 11 Völlner F, Fischer J, Weber M. et al. Weakening of the knee ligament complex due to sequential medial release in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139 (07) 999-1006
  • 12 Wada K, Hamada D, Tamaki S, Higashino K, Fukui Y, Sairyo K. Influence of medial collateral ligament release for internal rotation of tibia in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (01) 270-273
  • 13 McClelland JA, Webster KE, Ramteke AA, Feller JA. Total knee arthroplasty with computer-assisted navigation more closely replicates normal knee biomechanics than conventional surgery. Knee 2017; 24 (03) 651-656
  • 14 Picard F, Deep K, Jenny JY. Current state of the art in total knee arthroplasty computer navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (11) 3565-3574
  • 15 Kawata M, Sasabuchi Y, Inui H. et al. Annual trends in knee arthroplasty and tibial osteotomy: analysis of a national database in Japan. Knee 2017; 24 (05) 1198-1205
  • 16 Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS. et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (17) 1386-1397
  • 17 Koh HS, In Y. Semimembranosus release as the second step of soft tissue balancing in varus total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (02) 273-278
  • 18 Athwal KK, Daou HE, Kittl C, Davies AJ, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. The superficial medial collateral ligament is the primary medial restraint to knee laxity after cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: effects of implant type and partial release. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (08) 2646-2655
  • 19 Elmallah RK, Mistry JB, Cherian JJ. et al. Can we really “feel” a balanced total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (9, suppl): 102-105
  • 20 Gustke K. Use of smart trials for soft-tissue balancing in total knee replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (11, suppl A): 147-150
  • 21 Picard F, Deakin AH, Clarke IV, Dillon JM, Kinninmonth AW. A quantitative method of effective soft tissue management for varus knees in total knee replacement surgery using navigational techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2007; 221 (07) 763-772
  • 22 Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J, Victor J. The influence of coronal plane deformity on mediolateral ligament status: an observational study in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (02) 152-156
  • 23 Hakki S, Coleman S, Saleh K, Bilotta VJ, Hakki A. Navigational predictors in determining the necessity for collateral ligament release in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (09) 1178-1182
  • 24 Boguszewski DV, Cheung EC, Joshi NB, Markolf KL, McAllister DR. Male-female differences in knee laxity and stiffness. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (12) 2982-2987
  • 25 Deep K. Collateral ligament laxity in knees: what is normal?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (11) 3426-3431
  • 26 Sriphirom P, Siramanakul C, Chanopas B, Boonruksa S. Effects of posterior condylar osteophytes on gap balancing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty with posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018; 28 (04) 677-681