Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(06): 771-780
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722920
Original Article

Pediatric Fronto-Orbital Skull Reconstruction

Andrew M. Ferry
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Rami P. Dibbs
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Shayan M. Sarrami
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Amjed Abu-Ghname
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Han Zhuang Beh
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Renata S. Maricevich
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Edward P. Buchanan
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Craniofacial surgery in children is a highly challenging discipline that requires extensive knowledge of craniofacial anatomy and pathology. Insults to the fronto-orbital skeleton have the potential to inflict significant morbidity and even mortality in patients due to its proximity to the central nervous system. In addition, significant aesthetic and ophthalmologic disturbances frequently accompany these insults. Craniosynostosis, facial trauma, and craniofacial tumors are all pathologies that frequently affect the fronto-orbital region of the craniofacial skeleton in children. While the mechanisms of these pathologies vary greatly, the underlying principles of reconstruction remain the same. Despite the limited data in certain areas of fronto-orbital reconstruction in children, significant innovations have greatly improved its safety and efficacy. It is imperative that further investigations of fronto-orbital reconstruction are undertaken so that craniofacial surgeons may provide optimal care for these patients.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Grunwaldt L, Smith DM, Zuckerbraun NS. et al. Pediatric facial fractures: demographics, injury patterns, and associated injuries in 772 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 1263-1271
  • 2 Buchanan EP, Xue AS, Hollier Jr LH. Craniofacial syndromes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (01) 128e-153e
  • 3 Dempsey RF, Monson LA, Maricevich RS. et al. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Clin Plast Surg 2019; 46 (02) 123-139
  • 4 Derderian C, Seaward J. Syndromic craniosynostosis. Semin Plast Surg 2012; 26 (02) 64-75
  • 5 LoPresti M, Buchanan EP, Shah V, Hadley CM, Monson LA, Lam S. Complete resolution of papilledema in syndromic craniosynostosis with posterior cranial vault distraction. J Pediatr Neurosci 2017; 12 (02) 199-202
  • 6 Harshbarger R, Kelley P, Leake D, George T. Low dose craniofacial CT/ rapid access MRI protocol in craniosynostosis patients: decreased radiation exposure and cost savings. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 4-5
  • 7 Tuite GF, Chong WK, Evanson J. et al. The effectiveness of papilledema as an indicator of raised intracranial pressure in children with craniosynostosis. Neurosurgery 1996; 38 (02) 272-278
  • 8 Buchanan EP, Xue Y, Xue AS, Olshinka A, Lam S. Multidisciplinary care of craniosynostosis. J Multidiscip Healthc 2017; 10: 263-270
  • 9 Yu JW, Xu W, Wink JD, Wes AM, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA. Strabismus in unicoronal craniosynostosis: effect of orbital dysmorphology and fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 382e-390e
  • 10 Pickrell BB, Meaike JD, Cañadas KT, Chandy BM, Buchanan EP. Tracheal cartilaginous sleeve in syndromic craniosynostosis: an underrecognized source of significant morbidity and mortality. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (03) 696-699
  • 11 Jubbal KT, Agrawal N, Hollier Jr LH. Analysis of morbidity, readmission, and reoperation after craniosynostosis repair in children. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (02) 401-405
  • 12 Escher PJ, Tu AD, Kearney SL. et al. A protocol of situation-dependent transfusion, erythropoietin and tranexamic acid reduces transfusion in fronto-orbital advancement for metopic and coronal craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2020; 37 (01) 269-276 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04654-y.
  • 13 Utria AF, Lopez J, Cho RS. et al. Timing of cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: a single-institution 30-year experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 18 (05) 629-634
  • 14 Taylor JA, Paliga JT, Wes AM. et al. A critical evaluation of long-term aesthetic outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 220-231
  • 15 Barone CM, Jimenez DF. Endoscopic craniectomy for early correction of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (07) 1965-1973 , discussion 1974–1975
  • 16 Tahiri Y, Swanson JW, Taylor JA. Distraction osteogenesis versus conventional fronto-orbital advancement for the treatment of unilateral coronal synostosis: a comparison of perioperative morbidity and short-term outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (06) 1904-1908
  • 17 Braun TL, Eisemann BS, Olorunnipa O, Buchanan EP, Monson LA. Safety outcomes in endoscopic versus open repair of metopic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29 (04) 856-860
  • 18 Mundinger GS, Rehim SA, Johnson III O. et al. Distraction osteogenesis for surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (03) 657-669
  • 19 Wood RJ, Stewart CN, Liljeberg K, Sylvanus TS, Lim PK. Transfusion-free cranial vault remodeling: a novel, multifaceted approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (01) 167-174
  • 20 Zubovic E, Lapidus JB, Skolnick GB, Naidoo SD, Smyth MD, Patel KB. Cost comparison of surgical management of nonsagittal synostosis: traditional open versus endoscope-assisted techniques. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2020; 25 (04) 1-10
  • 21 Barrientos S, Miller J. Anterior cranial vault reconstruction with distraction for primary and secondary craniosynostosis repair. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) e109-e112
  • 22 Jeong WS, Choi JW, Oh TS. et al. Long-term follow-up of one-piece fronto-orbital advancement with distraction but without a bandeau for coronal craniosynostosis: Review of 26 consecutive cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44 (09) 1252-1258
  • 23 Bennett KG, Liang F, Ranganathan K, Muraszko KM, Vercler CJ, Buchman SR. Surgical hypercorrection of trigonocephaly: evaluation of surgical outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29 (01) 56-61
  • 24 Havlik RJ, Azurin DJ, Bartlett SP, Whitaker LA. Analysis and treatment of severe trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (02) 381-390
  • 25 Fawzy HH, Choi JW, Ra YS. One-piece fronto-orbital distraction with midline splitting but without bandeau for metopic craniosynostosis: craniometric, volumetric, and morphologic evaluation. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 83 (03) 285-292
  • 26 Liu MT, Khechoyan DY, Susarla SM. et al. Evolution of bandeau shape, orbital morphology, and craniofacial twist after fronto-orbital advancement for isolated unilateral coronal synostosis: a case-control study of 2-year outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (06) 1703-1711
  • 27 Masserano B, Woo AS, Skolnick GB. et al. The temporal region in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis: fronto-orbital advancement versus endoscopy-assisted strip craniectomy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55 (03) 423-429
  • 28 Bastidas N, Mackay DDJ, Taylor JA, Bartlett SP. Analysis of the long-term outcomes of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (04) 877-883
  • 29 Derderian CA, Wink JD, McGrath JL, Collinsworth A, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA. Volumetric changes in cranial vault expansion: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (06) 1665-1672
  • 30 Swanson JW, Samra F, Bauder A, Mitchell BT, Taylor JA, Bartlett SP. An algorithm for managing syndromic craniosynostosis using posterior vault distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 829e-841e
  • 31 Woods RH, Ul-Haq E, Wilkie AOM. et al. Reoperation for intracranial hypertension in TWIST1-confirmed Saethre-Chotzen syndrome: a 15-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (06) 1801-1810
  • 32 Ridgway EB, Wu JK, Sullivan SR. et al. Craniofacial growth in patients with FGFR3Pro250Arg mutation after fronto-orbital advancement in infancy. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (02) 455-461
  • 33 Rottgers SA, Lohani S, Proctor MR. Outcomes of endoscopic suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy in bilateral coronal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 18 (03) 281-286
  • 34 Vu AT, Patel PA, Chen W, Wilkening MW, Gordon CB. Pediatric frontal sinus fractures: outcomes and treatment algorithm. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (03) 776-781
  • 35 Cai SS, Mossop C, Diaconu SC. et al. The “Crumple Zone” hypothesis: association of frontal sinus volume and cerebral injury after craniofacial trauma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 45 (07) 1094-1098
  • 36 Coon D, Yuan N, Jones D, Howell LK, Grant MP, Redett RJ. Defining pediatric orbital roof fractures: patterns, sequelae, and indications for operation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (03) 442e-448e
  • 37 Lopez J, Pineault K, Pradeep T. et al. Pediatric frontal bone and sinus fractures: cause, characteristics, and a treatment algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (04) 1012-1023
  • 38 Kaderbhai J, Lo W, Rodrigues D. et al. Craniofacial approaches to pediatric orbital tumors. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (04) 1198-1200
  • 39 Dempsey RF, Chelius Jr DC, Pederson WC. et al. Pediatric craniomaxillofacial oncologic reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2019; 46 (02) 261-273
  • 40 Sepulveda A, Buchanan EP. Vascular tumors. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (02) 49-57
  • 41 Herle P, Shukla L, Morrison WA, Shayan R. Preoperative radiation and free flap outcomes for head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2015; 85 (03) 121-127
  • 42 Wang HD, Ibrahim Z, Quan A, Bai J, Ostrander BT, Redett RJ. Pediatric tissue expansion: predictors of premature expander removal in a single surgeon's experience with 472 expanders. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (03) 755-762
  • 43 Abu-Ghname A, Banuelos J, Oliver JD, Vyas K, Daniels D, Sharaf B. Outcomes and complications of pediatric cranioplasty: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 433e-443e
  • 44 Duek I, Pener-Tessler A, Yanko-Arzi R. et al. Skull base reconstruction in the pediatric patient. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (01) 81-90
  • 45 Schwartz MS, Crockett DM. Management of a large frontoethmoid osteoma with sinus cranialization and cranial bone graft reconstruction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1990; 20 (01) 63-72