Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2021; 5(01): 16-21
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723045
Original Article

The Operational and Financial Value of an Interventional Radiology Clinic at a Large, Academic, Tertiary Public Hospital System

Joseph L. McDevitt
1   Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Rehan S. Quadri
1   Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Patrick D. Sutphin
1   Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Mark Reddick
1   Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the operational and financial impact of an interventional radiology (IR) clinic at a tertiary county hospital system.

Methods The IR clinic, which opened in January 2017, evaluates outpatient referrals and completes preprocedure workups, nonimage-guided procedures, and postprocedure follow-up visits. Procedural volumes, locations, start times, and end times were analyzed from September 2015 to June 2018, with comparison of pre- and postclinic values by t-tests.

Results Relative to the preclinic period, the number of IR cases completed each quarter has increased by an average of 12% (pre: 953 ± 63, post: 1063 ± 34, p = 0.01). Procedures that saw the largest quarterly growth included port placements (44% increase; pre: 82 ± 8, post: 118 ± 17, p = 0.002), inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placements (24% increase; pre: 33 ± 12, post: 41 ± 8, p = 0.20), IVC filter removals (72% increase; pre: 18 ± 7, post: 31 ± 8, p = 0.02), and treatments of lower extremity venous disease (100% increase; pre: 7 ± 2, post: 14 ± 6, p = 0.04). Completion of 119 cases/quarter in clinic (removal of tunneled catheters and infusion ports), as well as a reduction of emergent nephrostomy exchanges, reduced quarterly facility charges for these procedures by $350,000. Since the opening of the IR clinic, the first outpatient case started 36 minutes earlier (p < 0.001) and the last case finished 19 minutes earlier (p = 0.004).

Conclusion Opening an IR clinic resulted in a significant increase in case volume while reducing avoidable costs and improving efficiency of the angiography suite.

Keywords

interventional radiology - clinic-based model - public hospital systems - quality improvement


Publication History

Article published online:
25 January 2021

© 2021. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Charalel RA, McGinty G, Brant-Zawadzki M. et al. Interventional radiology delivers high-value health care and is an Imaging 3.0 vanguard. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12 (05) 501-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Allen Jr B. Radiologists adding value through the clinical practice of interventional radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12 (04) 319-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Al-Kutoubi A. Admission privileges and clinical responsibilities for interventional radiologists. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015;38(2):257–260
  • 4 Zener R, Demers V, Bilodeau A. et al. Clinical IR in Canada: the evolution of a revolution. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (04) 524-530.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Koran ME, Lipnik AJ, Baker JC, Banovac F, Omary RA, Brown DB. Procedural impact of a dedicated interventional oncology service line in a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13 (09) 1145-1150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Soares GM. The value of clinical interventional radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8 (05) 318-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Abboud S, Partovi S, Nakamoto D, Azar N. The radiologist will see you now: patients’ perceptions of an outpatient interventional clinic. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2015; 46: 177-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bertino R, Pai D, Beach D. et al. Establishment of an interventional radiology clinic to follow untreated abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3 (04) 291-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lutjeboer J, Burgmans MC, Chung K. van Erkel ARJC. Impact on Patient Safety and Satisfaction of Implementation of an Outpatient Clinic in Interventional Radiology (IPSIPOLI-Study): a quasi-experimental prospective study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38 (03) 543-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mouli S, Baker JC, Brown DB. Interventional oncology service development. Semin Intervent Radiol 2017; 34 (02) 182-186
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Siskin GP, Bagla S, Sansivero GE, Mitchell NL. The interventional radiology clinic: what you need to know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2005; 22 (01) 39-44
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Siskin GP, Bagla S, Sansivero GE, Mitchell NL. The interventional radiology clinic: key ingredients for success. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15 (07) 681-688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McDevitt JL, Acosta-Torres S, Zhang N. et al. Long-term percutaneous nephrostomy management of malignant urinary obstruction: estimation of optimal exchange frequency and estimation of the financial impact of patient compliance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (07) 1036-1042.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Minocha J, Idakoji I, Riaz A. et al. Improving inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates: impact of a dedicated inferior vena cava filter clinic. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (12) 1847-1851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar