Effectiveness and Safety of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injection Regarding Anatomical Landmarks: A Cadaveric StudyFunding The project was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.
Background Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injections can be applied using anatomical landmarks or under the guide of ultrasound (US). US is not always available, and the physician may rely on the anatomical landmarks.
Objective The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TFCC injection with anatomic landmarks.
Methods Forty wrist specimens from cadavers were randomly assigned to four rapid blue stain injection groups as follows: Group A: perpendicular to skin with 5 mm depth; Group B: perpendicular to skin with 10 mm depth; Group C: 45-degree angulation to skin surface, oriented from proximal to distal with 10 mm depth; and Group D: 45-degree angulation to skin surface, oriented from distal to proximal with 10 mm depth. TFCC specimens were excised and evaluated with microscopy, and adjacent neurovascular structures were checked for any injury.
Results Injections in group A were more accurate than others, in which 8/10 injections were successful. Group C injections were least accurate in that only 4/10 were successful. The other remaining groups (groups B and D) revealed similar results (5/10 were successful). However, statistical analyses did not show any significant difference (p-value = 0.35). No injury to neurovascular structures was seen.
Conclusion Needle placement perpendicular to skin with 5 mm depth and just medial to ulnar styloid can be used as an accurate method of palpation-guided technique for TFCC injections.
Eingereicht: 22. September 2020
Angenommen: 29. Dezember 2020
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Februar 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
- 1 Casadei K, Kiel J. Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC) Injuries. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2020. . Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537055/
- 2 Brogan DM, Berger RA, Kakar S. Ulnar-sided wrist pain: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 2019; 7 (05) e1
- 3 Skalski MR, White EA, Patel DB. et al. The traumatized TFCC: an illustrated review of the anatomy and injury patterns of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016; 45 (01) 39-50
- 4 Jawed A, Ansari MT, Gupta V. TFCC injuries: how we treat?. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020; 11 (04) 570-579
- 5 Waryasz GR, Tambone R, Borenstein TR, Gil JA, DaSilva M. Review of anatomical placement of corticosteroid injections for uncommon hand, wrist, and elbow pathologies. R I Med J (2013) 2017; 100 (02) 31-34
- 6 Boesen M, Jensen KE, Torp-Pedersen S, Cimmino MA, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H. Intra-articular distribution pattern after ultrasound-guided injections in wrist joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Radiol 2009; 69 (02) 331-338
- 7 Wu W-T, Chang K-V, Mezian K. et al. Ulnar wrist pain revisited: ultrasound diagnosis and guided injection for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries. J Clin Med 2019; 8 (10) 1540
- 8 Nam SH, Kim J, Lee JH, Ahn J, Kim YJ, Park Y. Palpation versus ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections and short-term effect in the distal radioulnar joint disorder: a randomized, prospective single-blinded study. Clin Rheumatol 2014; 33 (12) 1807-1814
- 9 Smith J, Hurdle M-F, Locketz AJ, Wisniewski SJ. Ultrasound-guided piriformis injection: technique description and verification. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87 (12) 1664-1667
- 10 Colio SW, Smith J, Pourcho AM. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures of the wrist and hand: anatomy, indications, and techniques. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2016; 27 (03) 589-605
- 11 Berkoff DJ, Miller LE, Block JE. Clinical utility of ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee injections: a review. Clin Interv Aging 2012; 7: 89-95
- 12 Ruiz A, Bravo D, Duarte A, Adler R, Raya J. Ultrasound-guided intraarticular injection has higher accuracy than landmark-guided intraarticular injection in rat knee joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2020; 28: S303-S304
- 13 Koutsianas C, Klocke R. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided injections in rheumatology: a systematic review. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2016; 27 (04) 179-190
- 14 Wu T, Song HX, Dong Y, Li JH. Ultrasound-guided versus blind subacromial–subdeltoid bursa injection in adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2015; 45 (03) 374-378
- 15 Hoeber S, Aly A-R, Ashworth N, Rajasekaran S. Ultrasound-guided hip joint injections are more accurate than landmark-guided injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50 (07) 392-396
- 16 Aly A-R, Rajasekaran S, Ashworth N. Ultrasound-guided shoulder girdle injections are more accurate and more effective than landmark-guided injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49 (16) 1042-1049
- 17 Gilliland CA, Salazar LD, Borchers JR. Ultrasound versus anatomic guidance for intra-articular and periarticular injection: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 2011; 39 (03) 121-131
- 18 Cunnington J, Marshall N, Hide G. et al. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection into the joint of patients with inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62 (07) 1862-1869
- 19 Berona K, Abdi A, Menchine M. et al. Success of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided arthrocentesis of hip, ankle, and wrist in a cadaver model. Am J Emerg Med 2017; 35 (02) 240-244
- 20 Bookman JS, Pereira DS. Ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee and shoulder injections: a review. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2014; 72 (04) 266-270
- 21 Sage W, Pickup L, Smith TO, Denton ER, Toms AP. The clinical and functional outcomes of ultrasound-guided vs landmark-guided injections for adults with shoulder pathology--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52 (04) 743-751