J Wrist Surg 2021; 10(04): 329-334
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726294
Scientific Article

Outcomes following Distal Radius Fractures with Preexisting Ulnocarpal Abutment

Richard Samade
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
,
Nolan Farrell
2   College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
,
Omar Zaki
2   College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
,
Nicholas Farrar
2   College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
,
Kanu S. Goyal
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
Funding None.

Abstract

Background Due to the commonality of distal radius fractures (DRFs), the potential impact of ulnocarpal abutment (UA) on patient outcomes is significant, whether it developed after or prior to injury. It is, therefore, important to consider whether preexisting UA has any impact on outcomes after an acute DRF.

Questions/Purpose The aims of this study were to determine if differences were present in (1) pain at final follow-up, (2) complications, and (3) unintended operations in patients with DRFs and either without or with preexisting radiographic UA.

Methods A single institution retrospective cohort study comparing patients treated either nonoperatively (43 patients) or operatively (473 patients) for DRFs between 5/1/2008 to 5/1/2018 was performed. Data included demographics, prior wrist pain or surgery, ulnar variance, select treatment data, and presence of pain, complication, or unintended operation by final follow-up. Statistical testing used Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test, with a significance level of 0.05.

Results The prevalence of preexisting UA was 14.0 and 15.6% in the nonoperatively- and operatively treated groups, respectively. In nonoperatively treated patients without or with UA, no differences in pain (37.8 vs. 33.3%, p = 1.00) or complications were seen (13.5 vs. 50.0%, p = 0.07). A higher unintended operation rate for nonoperatively treated DRFs with UA, compared with those without, UA was seen (5.4 vs. 50.0%, p = 0.01). No differences in pain, complications, or unintended operations were seen between those without and with UA in the operatively treated group.

Conclusion Preexisting UA is not associated with pain, complications, or unintended operations after operative treatment of DRFs. Prospective studies further evaluating outcomes in nonoperatively treated DRFs with UA may be beneficial.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by our Biomedical Institutional Review Board. Informed consent for this retrospective study was not required by our Biomedical Institutional Review Board. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. Mai 2020

Angenommen: 03. Februar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. März 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Jarrett CD, Baratz ME. The management of ulnocarpal abutment and degenerative triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in the competitive athlete. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (03) 329-337 , ix
  • 2 Stockton DJ, Pelletier ME, Pike JM. Operative treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (05) 470-476
  • 3 Sachar K. Ulnar-sided wrist pain: evaluation and treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears, ulnocarpal impaction syndrome, and lunotriquetral ligament tears. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (07) 1489-1500
  • 4 Tomaino MM. Ulnar impaction syndrome in the ulnar negative and neutral wrist. Diagnosis and pathoanatomy. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998; 23 (06) 754-757
  • 5 Tomaino MM. The importance of the pronated grip x-ray view in evaluating ulnar variance. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (02) 352-357
  • 6 Iwatsuki K, Tatebe M, Yamamoto M, Shinohara T, Nakamura R, Hirata H. Ulnar impaction syndrome: incidence of lunotriquetral ligament degeneration and outcome of ulnar-shortening osteotomy. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (06) 1108-1113
  • 7 Baek GH, Chung MS, Lee YH, Gong HS, Lee S, Kim HH. Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (12) 2649-2654
  • 8 Kozin SH, Zlotolow DA. Madelung deformity. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (10) 2090-2098
  • 9 Hutchinson S, Faber KJ, Gan BS. The Essex-Lopresti injury: more than just a pain in the wrist. Can J Plast Surg 2006; 14 (04) 215-218
  • 10 Oskam J, Kingma J, Klasen HJ. Ulnar-shortening osteotomy after fracture of the distal radius. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993; 112 (04) 198-200
  • 11 Wada T, Isogai S, Kanaya K, Tsukahara T, Yamashita T. Simultaneous radial closing wedge and ulnar shortening osteotomies for distal radius malunion. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29 (02) 264-272
  • 12 Tatebe M, Shinohara T, Okui N, Yamamoto M, Imaeda T, Hirata H. Results of ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnocarpal abutment after malunited distal radius fracture. Acta Orthop Belg 2012; 78 (06) 714-718
  • 13 Fricker R, Pfeiffer KM, Troeger H. Ulnar shortening osteotomy in posttraumatic ulnar impaction syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1996; 115 (3-4): 158-161
  • 14 Cheng HS, Hung LK, Ho PC, Wong J. An analysis of causes and treatment outcome of chronic wrist pain after distal radial fractures. Hand Surg 2008; 13 (01) 1-10
  • 15 Esenwein P, Sonderegger J, Gruenert J, Ellenrieder B, Tawfik J, Jakubietz M. Complications following palmar plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a review of 665 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (08) 1155-1162
  • 16 Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (02) 113-125
  • 17 Lutz K, Yeoh KM, MacDermid JC, Symonette C, Grewal R. Complications associated with operative versus nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (07) 1280-1286
  • 18 Barbaric K, Rujevcan G, Labas M, Delimar D, Bicanic G. Ulnar shortening osteotomy after distal radius fracture malunion: review of literature. Open Orthop J 2015; 9: 98-106
  • 19 Haase SC, Chung KC. Management of malunions of the distal radius. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (02) 207-216
  • 20 Turner RG, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Complications of distal radius fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38 (02) 217-228 , vi
  • 21 Wilson J, Viner JJ, Johal KS, Woodruff MJ. Volar locking plate fixations for displaced distal radius fractures: an evaluation of complications and radiographic outcomes. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13 (04) 466-472
  • 22 Rhee S, Lee J, Song K, Lee G, Lee J. Lunate subchondral cysts: are there specific radiologic findings for patients with symptomatic ulnocarpal impaction?. J Orthop Sci 2019; 24 (04) 636-643
  • 23 Cha SM, Shin HD, Kim KC. Positive or negative ulnar variance after ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome: a retrospective study. Clin Orthop Surg 2012; 4 (03) 216-220
  • 24 Koppel M, Hargreaves I, Herbert T. Ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar carpal instability and ulnar carpal impaction. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 1997; 22B (04) 451-456
  • 25 Biswas S. Ulnolunate impaction syndrome. Eplasty 2015; 15: ic2