PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Dental Research and Biomaterials Journal 2021; 2(01): 1-5
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727292
Brief Report

Minocycline Hydrochloride as a Potential Adjuvant to Improve Osteoconductive and Osteoinductive Properties of Bone Substitutes in an Extra-Skeletal Bone Augmentation Model: Preliminary Observations in Rats

Bob Biewer 
1   Department of Periodontology and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Liège, Belgium
2   National Center of Pathology, Laboratoire national de santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg
,
Dorien Van Hede
1   Department of Periodontology and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Liège, Belgium
,
Eric Rompen
1   Department of Periodontology and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Liège, Belgium
,
Michel Mittelbronn
2   National Center of Pathology, Laboratoire national de santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg
3   Luxembourg Center of Neuropathology, Luxembourg
4   Department of Oncology, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg
5   Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
,
Pascale Quatresooz
6   Department of Human Histology and Dermatopathology, University Hospital, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
,
Felix B. Kleine Borgmann
3   Luxembourg Center of Neuropathology, Luxembourg
4   Department of Oncology, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The present study was performed to determine if minocycline HCl could influence the behavior of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and bioactive glass (BG) particles when used as filler material for new bone generation in a guided bone augmentation model.

Materials and Methods Two occlusive titanium caps were placed on the rat calvaria. One filled with BG particles, the second with DBBM particles, both previously mixed with blood (control). In minocycline HCl loaded groups (experimental), grafts were additionally placed into a minocycline solution. Samples were harvested after 4, 8, and 16 weeks. Half of the samples were embedded in methylmethacrylate for undecalcified histology and the other half was fixed, decalcified, and embedded in paraffin for classical histologic analysis.

Results The control groups highlighted osteoconductive and osteoinductive responses associated to BG particles, as well as an osteoconductive reaction, in DBBM sections. The addition of minocycline HCl to BG particles had no measurable influence on the result. In minocycline HCl loaded DBBM sections; however, areas of spontaneous ossification could be observed after 8 and 16 weeks.

Conclusion Our observations suggest that minocycline HCl may add some osteoinductive properties to DBBM within the limitations of this study design. Further investigations are needed to refine the present results.

Keywords

bioactive glass - deproteinized bovine bone mineral - minocycline hydrochloride - guided bone augmentation - extraskeletal bone formation - bone histology


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Oktober 2021

© 2021. European Dental Research and Biomaterials Journal. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Schwarz F, Papanicolau P, Rothamel D, Beck B, Herten M, Becker J. Influence of plaque biofilm removal on reestablishment of the biocompatibility of contaminated titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 77 (03) 437-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Edlund T, Lindhe J. The effect of antimicrobial therapy on periimplantitis lesions. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7 (04) 320-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zafar MS, Farooq I, Awais M, Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zohaib S. Bioactive surface coatings for enhancing osseointegration of dental implants. In: Biomedical, Therapeutic and Clinical Applications of Bioactive Glasses. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing 2018
  • 4 Gomes PS, Fernandes MH. Effect of therapeutic levels of doxycycline and minocycline in the proliferation and differentiation of human bone marrow osteoblastic cells. Arch Oral Biol 2007; 52 (03) 251-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Williams S, Wakisaka A, Zeng QQ. et al Effect of minocycline on osteoporosis. Adv Dent Res 1998; 12 (02) 71-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bain S, Ramamurthy NS, Impeduglia T, Scolman S, Golub LM, Rubin C. Tetracycline prevents cancellous bone loss and maintains near-normal rates of bone formation in streptozotocin diabetic rats. Bone 1997; 21 (02) 147-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Simmons DJ, Chang SL, Russell JE, Grazman B, Webster D, Oloff C. The effect of protracted tetracycline treatment on bone growth and maturation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (180) 253-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Khurshid Z, Husain S, Alotaibi H. et al. Novel techniques of scaffold fabrication for bioactive glasses. In: Biomedical, Therapeutic and Clinical Applications of Bioactive Glasses. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing 2018
  • 9 Skallevold HE, Rokaya D, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS. Bioactive glass applications in dentistry. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20 (23) 1-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wheeler DL, Eschbach EJ, Hoellrich RG, Montfort MJ, Chamberland DL. Assessment of resorbable bioactive material for grafting of critical-size cancellous defects. J Orthop Res 2000; 18 (01) 140-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Aludden HC, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Jensen T. Lateral ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone graft: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46 (08) 1030-1038
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hämmerle CH, Karring T. Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites. Periodontol2000 1998; 17: 151-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Zafar MS, Fareed MA, Riaz S, Latif M, Habib SR, Khurshid Z. Customized therapeutic surface coatings for dental implants. Coatings 2020;10(6)
  • 14 Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Sager M, Becker J. Angiogenesis pattern of native and cross-linked collagen membranes: an immunohistochemical study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17 (04) 403-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schmid J, Hämmerle CHF, Flückiger L. et al Blood-filled spaces with and without filler materials in guided bone regeneration. A comparative experimental study in the rabbit using bioresorbable membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8 (02) 75-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rompen EH, Biewer R, Vanheusden A, Zahedi S, Nusgens B. The influence of cortical perforations and of space filling with peripheral blood on the kinetics of guided bone generation. A comparative histometric study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10 (02) 85-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stavropoulos A, Kostopoulos L, Mardas N, Nyengaard JR, Karring T. Deproteinized bovine bone used as an adjunct to guided bone augmentation: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3 (03) 156-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Valentini P, Abensur D, Densari D, Graziani JN, Hämmerle C. Histological evaluation of Bio-Oss in a 2-stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9 (01) 59-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ducheyne P, Hench LL, Kagan II A, Martens M, Bursens A, Mulier JC. Effect of hydroxyapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1980; 14 (03) 225-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schepers E, de Clercq M, Ducheyne P, Kempeneers R. Bioactive glass particulate material as a filler for bone lesions. J Oral Rehabil 1991; 18 (05) 439-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Veis AA, Dabarakis NN, Parisis NA, Tsirlis AT, Karanikola TG, Printza DV. Bone regeneration around implants using spherical and granular forms of bioactive glass particles. Implant Dent 2006; 15 (04) 386-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Saito T, Takeuchi R, Hirakawa K. et al Slow-releasing potential of vancomycin-loaded porous hydroxyapatite blocks implanted into MRSA osteomyelitis. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63 (03) 245-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rompen EH, Goffinet GH, Nusgens B. Human periodontal ligament fibroblast behavior on chemically conditioned dentine: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 1999; 70 (10) 1144-1152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hockers T, Abensur D, Valentini P, Legrand R, Hammerle CHF. The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. A study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10 (06) 487-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar