Can We Consider Scholarship of Teaching Learning Rather than Focusing Only on Publications for Recognition of Medical Teachers by National Medical Commission?

Tejinder Singh; Piyush Gupta

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1728179

Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India), Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ann Natl Acad Med Sci 2021; 57(01): 01-02
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728179

Editorial

Can We Consider Scholarship of Teaching Learning Rather than Focusing Only on Publications for Recognition of Medical Teachers by National Medical Commission?

Authors

Tejinder Singh

¹Department of Pediatrics and Medical Education, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India
Piyush Gupta

²Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Full Text

References

References
1 Ray S, Shah I, Nundy S. The research output from Indian medical institutions between 2005 and 2014. Curr Med Res Prac 2016; 6: 49-58
2 Asokan N, Shaji KS. Methods to enhance capacity of medical teachers for research publications. Indian J Public Health 2016; 60 (02) 154-158
3 Aggarwal R, Gogtay N, Kumar R, Sahni P. Indian Association of Medical Journal Editors. Indian Association of Medical Journal Editors. The revised guidelines of the medical council of India for academic promotions: need for a rethink. Indian Pediatr 2016; 53 (01) 23-26
4 Tullu MS, Karande S. Quality research in Indian medical colleges and teaching institutions: the need of the hour. J Postgrad Med 2016; 62 (04) 213-215
5 Patra A, Chaudhary P, Ravi KS. Adverse impact of COVID-19 on anatomical sciences teachers of India and proposed ways to handle this predicament. Anat Sci Educ 2021; 14 (02) 163-165
6 Bandewar SV, Aggarwal A, Kumar R, Aggarwal R, Sahni P, Pai SA. Medical Council of India’s amended qualifications for Indian Medical Teachers: well-intended, yet half-hearted. Natl Med J India 2018; 31 (01) 1-4
7 Bandewar SV, Pai SA. Regressive trend: MCI’s approach to assessment of medical teachers’ performance. Indian J Med Ethics 2015; 12 (04) 192-195
8 Boyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1997: 1-26
9 Glassick CE, Huber MT, Maeroff GI, Boyer EL. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. Special Report of Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1997: 1-49
10 Morahan PS, Fleetwood J. The double helix of activity and scholarship: building a medical education career with limited resources. Med Educ 2008; 42 (01) 34-44
11 Hutchings P, Shulman LS. The scholarship of teaching: new elaborations, new developments. Change 1999; 31 (05) 11-15
12 Darling AL. Scholarship of teaching and learning in communication: new connections, new directions, new possibilities. Commun Educ 2003; 52 (01) 47-49
13 Felten P. Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 2013; 1 (01) 121-125