CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 100(S 02): S218
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728431
Abstracts
Otology / Neurotology / Audiology

Listening effort in CI users with electric-acoustic stimulation

T Weißgerber
1   Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik des Universitätsklinikums, Audiologische Akustik, Frankfurt am Main
,
T Stöver
2   Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik des Universitätsklinikums, Frankfurt am Main
,
U Baumann
1   Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik des Universitätsklinikums, Audiologische Akustik, Frankfurt am Main
› Author Affiliations
 

Introduction Speech perception in noise is often much more difficult for cochlear implant (CI) users than for normal hearing (NH) users. Use of a CI with residual hearing preservation which enables for the benefit of electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) has been reported to improve speech perception in noise compared to conventional CI. However, there has been little research on listening effort. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the listening effort of EAS users in noise.

Methods Combined with the assessment of the OLSA SRT in noise, the subjective listening effort was recorded in parallel with a category scaling method (ACALES). Listening effort was measured in a noise situation with spatial separation of speech and noise and in a diffuse sound field. The results of EAS users were compared with a normal hearing control group.

Results Average listening effort of the EAS group with deactivated CI at the signal-to-noise ratio of the speech reception threshold was worse than that of the NH group (2-3 category units, e.g. moderate vs. very strenuous). Using the EAS system reduced the listening effort by about one category unit. For positive signal-to-noise ratios (which are more common in everyday life) the listening effort with EAS was only a few category units worse than in the NH group.

Conclusion In the present study, EAS users showed an increased listening effort compared to the NH group. Listening effort in EAS users was reduced in all noise conditions.

Poster-PDF A-1702.pdf



Publication History

Article published online:
13 May 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany