J Knee Surg 2023; 36(01): 029-038
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729622
Original Article

Comparative Efficacy of Root Repair versus Partial Meniscectomy and Observation for Patients with Meniscus Root Tears

Wenli Dai*
1   Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Wenqiang Yan*
1   Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Xi Leng
2   Medical Imaging Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
,
Junyan Wang
1   Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Xiaoqing Hu
1   Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Yingfang Ao
1   Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to (1) compare the efficacy of root repair versus partial meniscectomy and observation for patients with meniscus root tears; (2) compare osteoarthritis (OA) progression and functional outcomes in patients with isolated repair and with adjuvant surgery; and (3) evaluate OA progression and functional outcomes after pullout repair or all-inside repair of meniscus root tears. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to September 1, 2020, to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy of root repair versus partial meniscectomy and observation in patients with meniscus root tears. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool data. A total of nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, with 485 patients comprising 238 in the root repair group, 113 in the partial meniscectomy group, and 134 in the observation group. The mean age of the patients ranged from 46.1 to 64.8 years. Compared with partial meniscectomy, root repair was associated with significantly lower postoperative Kellgren–Lawrence (K-L) grade (mean difference [MD]: −0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.00 to −0.23) and progression to arthroplasty rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04–0.60) at final follow-up. Compared with observation, root repair was associated with significantly lower arthroplasty rate (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01–0.44) and better International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (MD: 8.07, 95% CI: 0.72–15.41) at final follow-up. Moreover, significantly lower postoperative K-L grade and progression to arthroplasty rate, as well as higher IKDC and Lysholm scores were seen in favor of root repair in patients with isolated meniscus root tears. Additionally, significantly lower OA progression and higher function scores were found in favor of root repair when the tears were repaired with pullout technique. Current evidence indicates that root repair with pullout technique may be a better choice than partial meniscectomy and observation for patients with isolated meniscus root tears as measured by OA progression, progression to arthroplasty, as well as functional outcomes.

Authors' Contribution

W.D. developed the idea, developed the protocol, performed the systematic review, performed the analysis, and developed the manuscript. W.Y. developed the idea, developed the protocol, performed the systematic review, and developed the manuscript. X.L. and J.W. developed the manuscript. X.H. and Y.A. developed the idea, supervised the systematic review, and developed the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.


* These authors contributed equally to this work.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 03 December 2020

Accepted: 12 March 2021

Article published online:
01 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Allaire R, Muriuki M, Gilbertson L, Harner CD. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (09) 1922-1931
  • 2 Hein CN, Deperio JG, Ehrensberger MT, Marzo JM. Effects of medial meniscal posterior horn avulsion and repair on meniscal displacement. Knee 2011; 18 (03) 189-192
  • 3 Wang KH, Hwang DH, Cho JH, Changale SD, Woo SJ, Nha KW. Arthroscopic direct repair for a complete radial tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Clin Orthop Surg 2011; 3 (04) 332-335
  • 4 Ahn JH, Wang JH, Yoo JC, Noh HK, Park JH. A pull out suture for transection of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus: using a posterior trans-septal portal. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (12) 1510-1513
  • 5 Bin SI, Kim JM, Shin SJ. Radial tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (04) 373-378
  • 6 Hwang BY, Kim SJ, Lee SW. et al. Risk factors for medial meniscus posterior root tear. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (07) 1606-1610
  • 7 Kim JG, Lee YS, Bae TS. et al. Tibiofemoral contact mechanics following posterior root of medial meniscus tear, repair, meniscectomy, and allograft transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (09) 2121-2125
  • 8 Sung JH, Ha JK, Lee DW, Seo WY, Kim JG. Meniscal extrusion and spontaneous osteonecrosis with root tear of medial meniscus: comparison with horizontal tear. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (04) 726-732
  • 9 Han SB, Shetty GM, Lee DH. et al. Unfavorable results of partial meniscectomy for complete posterior medial meniscus root tear with early osteoarthritis: a 5- to 8-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (10) 1326-1332
  • 10 Krych AJ, Johnson NR, Mohan R, Dahm DL, Levy BA, Stuart MJ. Partial meniscectomy provides no benefit for symptomatic degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (04) 1117-1122
  • 11 West RV, Kim JG, Armfield D. et al. Lateral meniscal root tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: classification and management (SS-70). Arthroscopy 2004; 20: e32-e33
  • 12 Ahn JH, Kim SH, Yoo JC, Wang JH. All-inside suture technique using two posteromedial portals in a medial meniscus posterior horn tear. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (01) 101-108
  • 13 Choi NH, Son KM, Victoroff BN. Arthroscopic all-inside repair for a tear of posterior root of the medial meniscus: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (09) 891-893
  • 14 Kim YM, Rhee KJ, Lee JK, Hwang DS, Yang JY, Kim SJ. Arthroscopic pullout repair of a complete radial tear of the tibial attachment site of the medial meniscus posterior horn. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (07) 795.e1-795.e4
  • 15 Bhatia S, LaPrade CM, Ellman MB, LaPrade RF. Meniscal root tears: significance, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (12) 3016-3030
  • 16 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC. et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283 (15) 2008-2012
  • 17 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (10) 1006-1012
  • 18 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (10) e1-e34
  • 19 Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (09) 712-716
  • 20 Ochen Y, Beks RB, van Heijl M. et al. Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 364: k5120
  • 21 Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Colditz GA. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Stat Med 1995; 14 (04) 395-411
  • 22 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327 (7414): 557-560
  • 23 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315 (7109): 629-634
  • 24 Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54 (10) 1046-1055
  • 25 Ahn JH, Jeong HJ, Lee YS. et al. Comparison between conservative treatment and arthroscopic pull-out repair of the medial meniscus root tear and analysis of prognostic factors for the determination of repair indication. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135 (09) 1265-1276
  • 26 Bernard CD, Kennedy NI, Tagliero AJ. et al. Medial meniscus posterior root tear treatment: a matched cohort comparison of nonoperative management, partial meniscectomy, and repair. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (01) 128-132
  • 27 Chung KS, Ha JK, Ra HJ, Yu WJ, Kim JG. Root repair versus partial meniscectomy for medial meniscus posterior root tears: comparison of long-term survivorship and clinical outcomes at minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (08) 1937-1944
  • 28 Dragoo JL, Konopka JA, Guzman RA, Segovia N, Kandil A, Pappas GP. Outcomes of arthroscopic all-inside repair versus observation in older patients with meniscus root tears. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (05) 1127-1133
  • 29 Ke X, Qiu J, Chen S. et al. Concurrent arthroscopic meniscal repair during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy is not clinically beneficial for medial meniscus posterior root tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 29 (03) 955-965
  • 30 Kim CW, Lee CR, Gwak HC. et al. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with lax healing after medial meniscal root repair: comparison with subtotal meniscectomy. Arthroscopy 2019; 35 (11) 3079-3086
  • 31 Kim SB, Ha JK, Lee SW. et al. Medial meniscus root tear refixation: comparison of clinical, radiologic, and arthroscopic findings with medial meniscectomy. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (03) 346-354
  • 32 Lee DW, Lee SH, Kim JG. Outcomes of medial meniscal posterior root repair during proximal tibial osteotomy: is root repair beneficial?. Arthroscopy 2020; 36 (09) 2466-2475
  • 33 Lee OS, Lee SH, Lee YS. Comparison of the radiologic, arthroscopic, and clinical outcomes between repaired versus unrepaired medial meniscus posterior horn root tear during open wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg 2021; 34 (01) 57-66
  • 34 Costa CR, Morrison WB, Carrino JA. Medial meniscus extrusion on knee MRI: is extent associated with severity of degeneration or type of tear?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183 (01) 17-23
  • 35 Foreman SC, Liu Y, Nevitt MC. et al. Meniscal root tears and extrusion are significantly associated with the development of accelerated knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Cartilage 2020; •••: 1947603520934525
  • 36 Teichtahl AJ, Cicuttini FM, Abram F. et al. Meniscal extrusion and bone marrow lesions are associated with incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25 (07) 1076-1083
  • 37 Ozkoc G, Circi E, Gonc U, Irgit K, Pourbagher A, Tandogan RN. Radial tears in the root of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (09) 849-854
  • 38 Moon HS, Choi CH, Jung M, Lee DY, Hong SP, Kim SH. Early surgical repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear minimizes the progression of meniscal extrusion: 2-year follow-up of clinical and radiographic parameters after arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (11) 2692-2702
  • 39 Lee BS, Bin SI, Kim JM, Park MH, Lee SM, Bae KH. Partial meniscectomy for degenerative medial meniscal root tears shows favorable outcomes in well-aligned, nonarthritic knees. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (03) 606-611
  • 40 Lobenhoffer P. The rationale of osteotomy around the knee. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (05) 386-392
  • 41 Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW. et al. Second-look arthroscopic assessment of cartilage regeneration after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (01) 72-79
  • 42 Sterett WI, Steadman JR, Huang MJ, Matheny LM, Briggs KK. Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee: survivorship analysis. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (07) 1420-1424
  • 43 Padalecki JR, Jansson KS, Smith SD. et al. Biomechanical consequences of a complete radial tear adjacent to the medial meniscus posterior root attachment site: in situ pull-out repair restores derangement of joint mechanics. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (03) 699-707
  • 44 Daney BT, Aman ZS, Krob JJ. et al. Utilization of transtibial centralization suture best minimizes extrusion and restores tibiofemoral contact mechanics for anatomic medial meniscal root repairs in a cadaveric model. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (07) 1591-1600
  • 45 Chung KS, Choi CH, Bae TS. et al. Comparison of tibiofemoral contact mechanics after various transtibial and all-inside fixation techniques for medial meniscus posterior root radial tears in a porcine model. Arthroscopy 2018; 34 (04) 1060-1068
  • 46 Ro KH, Kim JH, Heo JW, Lee DH. Clinical and radiological outcomes of meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy for medial meniscus root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (11) 2325967120962078
  • 47 Chung KS, Ha JK, Yeom CH. et al. Comparison of clinical and radiologic results between partial meniscectomy and refixation of medial meniscus posterior root tears: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (10) 1941-1950
  • 48 Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 6.1. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2020