Abstract
Background The sagittal maxillary fracture often coexists with maxillary fractures and warrants
a definitive management strategy together with other maxillary fractures.
Method This study was conducted on 60 patients suffering from sagittal maxillary fracture.
Palatal fractures were classified into six subgroups. During management, patients
were divided into three groups. In group A, patients with type I, IV, V, and VI were
managed with maxillomandibular fixation and anterior maxillary buttress stabilization.
Group B patients included type II, III, and IV palatal fractures. These fractures
were undisplaced and were managed with maxillomandibular fixation, anterior alveolar
plating, and anterior maxillary buttress stabilization. Group C included type II and
III fractures with visible gap in the palate and were managed with maxillomandibular
fixation, palatal vault plating, anterior alveolar plating, and anterior maxillary
buttress stabilization.
Result Sagittal maxillary fracture was more common in young males. Le Fort I and II fractures
were more frequently associated with it in isolation or in combination. Parasagittal
and sagittal fractures were the most common types. Sixteen patients of group A, twenty
patients of group B, and twenty-four patients of group C were managed. Malocclusion
(2), plate extrusion (2), and oroantral fistula (2) were the most common complications.
Conclusion Sagittal maxillary fracture can be diagnosed with clinical and radiological examination.
Palatal vault plating is required in displaced palatal fractures of type II and III.
Single plate fixed in posterior half of middle one-third of palate gives sufficient
stability to the palatal vault.
Keywords
sagittal maxillary fracture - palatal vault fracture - anterior alveolar plating -
palatal vault plating - maxillary buttress stabilization
