CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2022; 11(01): 049-054
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730102
Original Article

The Effect of Size of Decompressive Craniectomy on Outcome in Deep Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Sashanka Kode
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Nizams Institute of Neurosciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
3   Institute of Neurological Sciences, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
,
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None. Note: ½ABC is the formula used to measure the volume gained, where A denotes the diameter, B the perpendicular line, and C the height. Note: In the expression ABC/2, A and B are the perpendicular maximal diameters of the lesion and C is the total length in the vertical plane. Note: In the expression ABC/2, A and B are the perpendicular maximal diameters of the lesion and C is the total length in the vertical plane.

Abstract

Introduction Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) is one of the most devastating forms of stroke with a mortality of 30 to 40%. We aimed to evaluate the effect of craniotomy size and volume of decompression on surgical outcome, complications, mortality, and morbidity in patients with supratentorial capsuloganglionic bleeds who underwent a decompressive craniectomy (DC) at our institute.

Materials and Methods It is a retrospective study done between January 2015 and December 2019. All patients with capsuloganglionic bleeds who had DC and hematoma evacuation were included in the study.

Results A total of 55 patients underwent DC for SICH at our hospital during the study period. Mean anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the bone flap was 12.42 cm. The volume of decompression did not influence mortality and morbidity in our study but a larger AP diameter was associated with a higher incidence of hydrocephalus. A smaller craniectomy with an AP diameter of < 12 cm caused a lesser reduction in midline shift (MLS). Persistent postoperative MLS had a significant impact on mortality and its reduction was dependent on the size of craniectomy (p =–0.037)

Conclusion DC with a recommended AP diameter of 12 to 13 cm achieves optimal results in terms of reduction in MLS. Larger DC volume carries a higher risk of hydrocephalus and requires close follow-up.



Publication History

Article published online:
24 November 2021

© 2021. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Dennis MS. Outcome after brain haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 16 (Suppl. 01) 9-13
  • 2 Hemphill JC II, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS. et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015; 46 (07) 2032-2060
  • 3 Olivecrona M, Rodling-Wahlström M, Naredi S, Koskinen L-OD. Effective ICP reduction by decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated by an ICP-targeted therapy. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24 (06) 927-935
  • 4 Bor-Seng-Shu E, Figueiredo EG, Fonoff ET, Fujimoto Y, Panerai RB, Teixeira MJ. Decompressive craniectomy and head injury: brain morphometry, ICP, cerebral hemodynamics, cerebral microvascular reactivity, and neurochemistry. Neurosurg Rev 2013; 36 (03) 361-370
  • 5 Bor-Seng-Shu E, Figueiredo EG, Amorim RLO. et al. Decompressive craniectomy: a meta-analysis of influences on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (03) 589-596
  • 6 Jüttler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P, et al. Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment of Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery (DESTINY). Stroke. Published online September 1, 2007. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/strokeaha.107.485649 Accessed February 05, 2021
  • 7 Tagliaferri F, Zani G, Iaccarino C. et al. Decompressive craniectomies, facts and fiction: a retrospective analysis of 526 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (05) 919-926
  • 8 Kurzbuch AR. Does size matter? Decompressive surgery under review. Neurosurg Rev 2015; 38 (04) 629-640
  • 9 Kunze E, Meixensberger J, Janka M, Sörensen N, Roosen K. Decompressive craniectomy in patients with uncontrollable intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998; 71: 16-18
  • 10 Güresir E, Schuss P, Vatter H, Raabe A, Seifert V, Beck J. Decompressive craniectomy in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26 (06) E4
  • 11 Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Martin R. et al. Interpretation and Implementation of Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial (INTERACT II). J Vasc Interv Neurol 2014; 7 (02) 34-40
  • 12 Nagatani K, Wada K, Takeuchi S. et al. A suitable formula for estimating the volume gained by decompressive craniectomy in malignant hemispheric infarction. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2013; 118: 285-288
  • 13 Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, Murray GD, Gholkar A, Mitchell PM. STICH II Investigators. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 382 (98/90) 397-408
  • 14 Yao Z, Ma L, You C, He M. Decompressive craniectomy for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018; 110: 121-128
  • 15 Hayes SB, Benveniste RJ, Morcos JJ, Aziz-Sultan MA, Elhammady MS. Retrospective comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for surgical evacuation of nontraumatic, supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 34 (05) E3
  • 16 Tanrikulu L, Oez-Tanrikulu A, Weiss C. et al. The bigger, the better? About the size of decompressive hemicraniectomies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 135: 15-21
  • 17 Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7 (08) 728-741
  • 18 Münch E, Horn P, Schürer L, Piepgras A, Paul T, Schmiedek P. Management of severe traumatic brain injury by decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (02) 315-322 discussion 322–323
  • 19 Millar K, Eljamel S. Does size and site matter in therapeutic decompressive craniectomy? A laboratory-based experimental study. World Neurosurg 2016; 95: 441-446
  • 20 De Bonis P, Pompucci A, Mangiola A, Rigante L, Anile C. Post-traumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy: an underestimated risk factor. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27 (11) 1965-1970
  • 21 Waziri A, Fusco D, Mayer SA, McKhann II GM, Connolly Jr ES. Postoperative hydrocephalus in patients undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (03) 489-493 discussion 493–494