PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2021; 42(02): 107-114
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731691
Review Article

Troubleshooting Cochlear Implant Processors via Tele-Audiology

Benjamin Boss
1   Department of Audiology, Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
2   University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

This case study examines the methods used to troubleshoot a cochlear implant processor via video visit with a nonagenarian (90+ years old) with a bimodal cochlear implant system. This article will discuss the evaluation and management as well as which specific issues could be addressed virtually and how they were resolved. Examples will be provided about how to virtually connect with the patient and how to best facilitate communication during a video visit. Additionally, this article will examine the captioning apps and other hearing assistive technology available for smartphones that can provide further assistance during a cell phone call along with their benefits and limitations.

Keywords

cochlear implant - telemedicine - bimodal - hearing aid - cell phone


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Wolfe J, Schafer E. Programming Cochlear Implants. 2nd ed.. Plural Publishing; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Rajguru SM, Truy E, Gupta C. The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2012; 295 (11) 1967-1980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Roberts DS, Lin HW, Herrmann BS, Lee DJ. Differential cochlear implant outcomes in older adults. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (08) 1952-1956
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Conrad CA, Zwolan TA. Datalogging statistics and speech recognition during the first year of use in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40 (07) e686-e693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Carmel E, Kronenberg J, Wolf M, Migirov L. Telephone use among cochlear implanted children. Acta Otolaryngol 2011; 131 (02) 156-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Anderson I, Baumgartner W-D, Böheim K, Nahler A, Arnoldner C, D'Haese P. Telephone use: What benefit do cochlear implant users receive?. Int J Audiol 2006; 45 (08) 446-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kepler LJ, Terry M, Sweetman RH. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population. Ear Hear 1992; 13 (05) 311-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rey P, Cochard N, Rizzoli M. et al. Technical aids for speech understanding in cochlear implanted adults using cell-phones. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016; 133 (04) 253-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wolfe J, Morais M, Schafer E. Speech recognition of bimodal cochlear implant recipients using a wireless audio streaming accessory for the telephone. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (02) e20-e25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Marcrum SC, Picou EM, Steffens T. Avoiding disconnection: an evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2017; 56 (03) 186-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Picou EM, Ricketts TA. Comparison of wireless and acoustic hearing aid-based telephone listening strategies. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (02) 209-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Potts LG, Skinner MW, Litovsky RA, Strube MJ, Kuk F. Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (06) 353-373
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar