CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(01): 234-239
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732805
Case Report

Esthetic Rehabilitation of Anterior Dentition with Different Types of Ceramic Restorations: Two Case Reports

Michal Krump
1   Department of Esthetic Dentistry, Private Dental Practice, Puchov, Slovak Republic
,
Zelmira Krumpova
1   Department of Esthetic Dentistry, Private Dental Practice, Puchov, Slovak Republic
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

All-ceramic systems represent an excellent restorative alternative for fixed dental prostheses, single crowns, and veneers in the anterior dentition. With respect to improved mechanical properties, lithium disilicate ceramic material provide a broad range of indications, and extended veneers can serve as an alternative to full crowns. Although ceramic veneers represent a more conservative approach compared to crowns, the correct indication is essential to achieving the ideal outcome. The following case reports describe two types of fixed restorations of the anterior dentition: extended lithium disilicate ceramic veneers and lithium disilicate full crowns. Factors influencing treatment selection for each type of restorations are presented.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 October 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98 (05) 389-404
  • 2 Della A Bona, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139 (Suppl 8S-13S
  • 3 Gresnigt M, Ozcan M. Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth with porcelain laminates and sectional veneers. J Can Dent Assoc 2011; 77: b143
  • 4 Krump M. Esthetic rehabilitation with minimally invasive lithium disilicate ceramic veneers. Prosthodontics 2021; 71: 38-43
  • 5 da Cunha LF, Reis R, Santana L, Romanini JC, Carvalho RM, Furuse AY. Ceramic veneers with minimum preparation. Eur J Dent 2013; 7 (04) 492-496
  • 6 Layton DM, Clarke M, Walton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25 (06) 590-603
  • 7 Layton DM, Clarke M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of non-feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26 (02) 111-124
  • 8 Layton DM, Walton TR. The up to 21-year clinical outcome and survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: accounting for clustering. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25 (06) 604-612
  • 9 Terry DA, Geller W. Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. Material selection and Technique. 3rd ed. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing 2018: 12-17
  • 10 Santos MJ, Costa MD, Rubo JH, Pegoraro LF, Santos Jr GC. Current all-ceramic systems in dentistry: a review. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2015; 36 (01) 31-37, quiz 38, 40
  • 11 Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) 84-96
  • 12 Giordano R, McLaren EA. Ceramics overview: classification by microstructure and processing methods. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010; 31 (09) 682-684 686, 688 passim, quiz 698, 700
  • 13 Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28 (03) 227-235
  • 14 Oh SC, Dong JK, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Strength and microstructure of IPS Empress 2 glass-ceramic after different treatments. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13 (06) 468-472
  • 15 Zarone F, Ferrari M, Mangano FG, Leone R, Sorrentino R. Digitally oriented materials: focus on lithium disilicate ceramics. Int J Dent 2016; 2016: 9840594
  • 16 Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89 (04) 374-380
  • 17 Guess PC, Stappert CFJ. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (06) 804-813
  • 18 Christensen GJ. Facing the challenges of ceramic veneers. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137 (05) 661-664
  • 19 Silva JSA, Rolla JN, Edelhoff D, Araujo E, Baratieri LN. All-ceramic crowns and extended veneers in anterior dentition: a case report with critical discussion. The American Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 2011; 6: 60-70
  • 20 Elderton RJ. Clinical studies concerning re-restoration of teeth. Adv Dent Res 1990; 4: 4-9
  • 21 Silva NR, Thompson VP, Valverde GB. et al. Comparative reliability analyses of zirconium oxide and lithium disilicate restorations in vitro and in vivo. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142 (Suppl. 02) 4S-9S
  • 22 Sudré JP, Salvio LA, Baroudi K, Sotto-Maior BS, Melo-Silva CL, Souza Picorelli Assis NM. Influence of surface treatment of lithium disilicate on roughness and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2020; 33 (02) 212-216
  • 23 Land MF, Hopp CD. Survival rates of all-ceramic systems differ by clinical indication and fabrication method. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010; 10 (01) 37-38
  • 24 van JW Dijken, Hasselrot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater 2010; 26 (09) 929-939
  • 25 Malchiodi L, Zotti F, Moro T. De Santis D, Albanese M. Clinical and esthetical evaluation of 79 lithium disilicate multilayered anterior veneers with a medium follow-up of 3 years. Eur J Dent 2019; 13 (04) 581-588
  • 26 Gürel G. Porcelain laminate veneers: minimal tooth preparation by design. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51 (02) 419-ix doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.007.
  • 27 Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87 (05) 503-509
  • 28 De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y. et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82 (02) 136-140
  • 29 Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure–a clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19 (06) 625-628 630, 632 passim, quiz 638
  • 30 Meijering AC, Creugers NH, Roeters FJ, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent 1998; 26 (07) 563-568
  • 31 Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25 (01) 79-85
  • 32 von Stein-Lausnitz M, Mehnert A, Bruhnke M. et al. Direct or indirect restoration of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors with class III defects? composite vs veneer or crown restoration. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20 (06) 519-526
  • 33 Dozic A, Tsagkari M, Khashayar G, Aboushelib M. Color management of porcelain veneers: influence of dentin and resin cement colors. Quintessence Int 2010; 41 (07) 567-573