RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000067.xml
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Semin Hear 2021; 42(03): 224-236
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735131
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735131
Review Article
Increasing the Effectiveness of Hearing Aid Directional Microphones
Abstract
Directionality is the only hearing aid technology — in addition to amplification — proven to help hearing aid users hear better in noise. Hearing aid directionality has been documented to improve speech intelligibility in multiple laboratory studies. In contrast, real-world studies have shown a disconnect between the potential of the technology and what hearing aid users experience in their daily life. This article describes the real-world studies that inspired ReSound to take a different approach to applying directional microphone technology. This approach is based on the idea that hearing aid directionality can leverage natural binaural hearing and inherent listening strategies. The directional strategy includes three listening modes that will be explained. These are the Spatial Cue Preservation mode, the Binaural Listening mode, and the Speech Intelligibility mode. The strategy and the advantages it provides in terms of sound quality, spatial hearing, and improved signal-to-noise ratio with maintained awareness of surroundings are explained.
Keywords
directional microphones - binaural hearing - improved signal-to-noise ratio - situational awarenessPublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. September 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Picou EM. MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) survey results demonstrate high satisfaction with and benefits from hearing aids. Semin Hear 2020; 41 (01) 21-36
- 2 Killion MC. SNR loss: “I Can Hear What People Say, but I Can't Understand Them. Hear Rev 1997; 4 (12) 8-14
- 3 Killion MC. The SIN report: Circuits haven't solved the hearing-in-noise problem. Hear J 1997; 50 (10) 28-32
- 4 Killion MC. Hearing aids: past, present, future: moving toward normal conversations in noise. Br J Audiol 1997; 31 (03) 141-148
- 5 Moore BCJ. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. (Oxford Psychology Series; No 28; ). Oxford University Press; 1995
- 6 Peters RW, Moore BC, Baer T. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103 (01) 577-587
- 7 Plomp R. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29 (02) 146-154
- 8 Nielsen HB. A Comparison Between Hearing Aids with Directional Microphone and Hearing Aids with Conventional Microphone. Scand Audiol 1973; 2 (03) 173-176
- 9 Mueller GH, Ricketts TA. Directional-microphone hearing aids: an update. Hear J 2000; 53 (05) 10-19
- 10 Bentler RA. Effectiveness of Directional Microphones and Noise Reduction Schemes in Hearing Aids: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (07) 473-484
- 11 Ricketts TA. Directional hearing aids: then and now. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42 (4, Suppl 2): 133-144
- 12 Ricketts TA. Directional hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5 (04) 139-176
- 13 Dhar S, Humes LE, Calandruccio L, Barlow NN, Hipskind N. Predictability of speech-in-noise performance from real ear measures of directional hearing aids. Ear Hear 2004; 25 (02) 147-158
- 14 Pumford JM, Seewald RC, Scollie SD, Jenstad LM. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (01) 23-35
- 15 Ricketts T, Dhar S. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10 (04) 180-189
- 16 Ricketts T. Impact of noise source configuration on directional hearing aid benefit and performance. Ear Hear 2000; 21 (03) 194-205
- 17 Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear Hear 2003; 24 (05) 424-439
- 18 Valente M, Schuchman G, Potts LG, Beck LB. Performance of dual-microphone in-the-ear hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (04) 181-189
- 19 Wouters J, Litière L, van Wieringen A. Speech intelligibility in noisy environments with one- and two-microphone hearing aids. Audiology 1999; 38 (02) 91-98
- 20 Nielsen HB, Ludvigsen C. Effect of hearing aids with directional microphones in different acoustic environments. Scand Audiol 1978; 7 (04) 217-224
- 21 Cord MT, Surr RK, Walden BE, Olson L. Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13 (06) 295-307
- 22 Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Edwards B, Olson L. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (10) 540-560
- 23 Surr RK, Walden BE, Cord MT, Olson L. Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13 (06) 308-322
- 24 Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Dyrlund O. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15 (05) 365-396
- 25 Cord MT, Surr RK, Walden BE, Dyrlund O. Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15 (05) 353-364
- 26 Avan P, Giraudet F, Büki B. Importance of binaural hearing. Audiol Neurotol 2015; 20 (Suppl. 01) 3-6
- 27 Dillon H. Hearing Aids. 2nd ed.. Boomerang Press; 2012: 430-442
- 28 Zurek P. Binaural advantages and directional effects on speech intelligibility. In: Studebaker GA, Hochberg I. eds. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1993: 975-979
- 29 Bentler RA, Egge JL, Tubbs JL, Dittberner AB, Flamme GA. Quantification of directional benefit across different polar response patterns. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15 (09) 649-659
- 30 Cord MT, Walden BE, Surr RK, Dittberner AB. Field evaluation of an asymmetric directional microphone fitting. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (03) 245-256
- 31 Picinali L, Prosser S, Mancuso A, Vercellesi G. Speech Intelligibility in Virtual Environments Simulating an Asymmetric Directional Microphone Configuration. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123 (05) 3305-3305
- 32 Kim JS, Bryan MF. The effects of asymmetric directional microphone fittings on acceptance of background noise. Int J Audiol 2011; 50 (05) 290-296
- 33 Kirkwood BC, Jespersen CT. How asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings affect speech recognition. Can Audiol [serial online] 2017;4(1). Accessed February 10, 2021 at: https://canadianaudiologist.ca/issue/volume-4-issue-1-2017/asymmetric-speech-recognition-feature/
- 34 Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (02) 177-186
- 35 Cherry EC. Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1953; 25 (05) 975-979
- 36 Broadbent DE. A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. Psychol Rev 1957; 64 (03) 205-215
- 37 Piechowiak T, Ma C, de Vries R, Dittberner A. A binaural auditory steering strategy based hearing-aid algorithm design. J Acoust Soc Am 2018; 143 (06) EL490-EL495
- 38 Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Grant KW, Summers V, Dittberner AB. The robustness of hearing aid microphone preferences in everyday listening environments. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (05) 358-379
- 39 Hornsby B. Effects of noise type and location on binaural benefit in asymmetric directional fittings. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123 (05) 3168-3168
- 40 Groth J. Binaural Directionality II with Spatial Sense. 2015 . Accessed February 10, 2021 at: https://bit.ly/3qac9Dg
- 41 Jespersen CT, Kirkwood BC, Schindwolf I. M&RIE receiver preferred for sound quality and localisation. 2020 . Accessed February 10, 2021 at: https://bit.ly/3pbXMx4
- 42 Xu J, Han W. Improvement of Adult BTE Hearing Aid Wearers' Front/Back Localization Performance Using Digital Pinna-Cue Preserving Technologies: An Evidence-Based Review. Korean J Audiol 2014; 18 (03) 97-104
- 43 Jespersen CT, Kirkwood BC, Groth J. Effect of directional strategy on audibility of sounds in the environment for varying hearing loss severity. Can Audiol [serial online]. 2017;4(6). Accessed February 10, 2021 at: https://canadianaudiologist.ca/issue/volume-4-issue-6-2017/directional-strategy-feature/
- 44 Groth J. The evolution of the ReSound binaural hearing strategy: All Access Directionality and Ultra Focus. 2020 . Accessed February 10, 2021 at: 13512_109573260 (webdamdb.com)
- 45 Groth J, Laureyns M. Preserving localization in hearing instrument fittings. Hear J 2011; 64 (02) 34-38
- 46 Groth J, Laureyns M, Piskosz M. Double-blind study indicates sound quality preference for surround sound processor. Hear Rev 2010; 17 (03) 36-41 Accessed February 10, 2021 at: https://www.hearingreview.com/practice-building/practice-management/double-blind-study-indicates-sound-quality-preference-for-surround-sound-processor
- 47 Møller KN, Jespersen CT. The Effect of Bandsplit Directionality on Speech Recognition and Noise Perception. Hear Rev [serial online] 2013. Accessed February 10, 2021 at: https://www.hearingreview.com/hearing-products/accessories/earmolds/the-effect-of-bandsplit-directionality-on-speech-recognition-and-noise-perception
- 48 Goyette A, Crukley J, Galster J. The Effects of Varying Directional Bandwidth in Hearing Aid Users' Preference and Speech-in-Noise Performance. Am J Audiol 2018; 27 (01) 95-103