Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38(06): 466-471
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735835
Original Article

Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction in an Academic versus a Community Setting

Joseph Lewcun
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Sameer Massand
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
John Trangucci
2   Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
,
Chan Shen
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Timothy S. Johnson
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Head and neck free flap reconstructions are complex procedures requiring extensive resources, and have the potential to be highly morbid. As such, it is imperative that they should be performed in an appropriate setting, optimizing outcomes while limiting morbidity. The aim of this study is to identify any disparities in the treatment outcomes of patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction by a single surgeon in an academic versus a community hospital setting.

Methods A retrospective review of all patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction for any indication by a single surgeon from 2009 to 2019 was conducted. All surgeries were performed at one of two hospitals: one academic medical center and one community hospital. Demographics and rates of partial or complete flap failure, medical complications, surgical complications, mortality, and other secondary outcomes were compared between the two settings.

Results Ninety-two patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction were included. Fifty-seven (62%) of free flap reconstructions were performed in the academic medical center, while 35 (38%) were performed in the community hospital. There were no significant differences in complete flap loss, either intraoperative or postoperative (p = 0.5060), partial flap loss (p = 0.5827), postoperative surgical complications (p = 0.2930), or medical complications (p = 0.7960) between groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0% (n = 0) at the university hospital as compared with 5.7% at the community hospital (p = 0.0681). The mean operative time was 702.3 minutes at the university hospital and 606.3 minutes at the community hospital (p = 0.0080).

Conclusion Head and neck free flap surgery can be performed safely in either an academic or a community setting, with no difference in primary outcomes of surgery. Preferential selection of either treatment setting should be based on consideration of patient needs and availability of auxiliary specialty services.

Keywords

free flap reconstruction - head and neck - community hospital - surgical outcomes


Publication History

Received: 26 April 2021

Accepted: 09 August 2021

Article published online:
28 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Urken ML, Buchbinder D, Costantino PD. et al. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite flaps: report of 210 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124 (01) 46-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wu CC, Lin PY, Chew KY, Kuo YR. Free tissue transfers in head and neck reconstruction: complications, outcomes and strategies for management of flap failure: analysis of 2019 flaps in single institute. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (05) 339-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vamadeva SV, Henry FP, Mace A, Clarke PM, Wood SH, Jallali N. Secondary free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (07) 1129-1134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Peters TT, Post SF, van Dijk BA. et al. Free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer can be safely performed in both young and elderly patients after careful patient selection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (10) 2999-3005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gao LL, Basta M, Kanchwala SK, Serletti JM, Low DW, Wu LC. Cost-effectiveness of microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck defects after oncologic resection. Head Neck 2017; 39 (03) 541-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Balasubramanian D, Thankappan K, Kuriakose MA. et al. Reconstructive indications of simultaneous double free flaps in the head and neck: a case series and literature review. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (06) 423-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nouraei SA, Middleton SE, Hudovsky A. et al. Role of reconstructive surgery in the management of head and neck cancer: a national outcomes analysis of 11,841 reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (04) 469-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 van Gijn DR, D'Souza J, King W, Bater M. Free flap head and neck reconstruction with an emphasis on postoperative care. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (06) 597-604
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Garg RK, Wieland AM, Hartig GK, Poore SO. Risk factors for unplanned readmission following head and neck microvascular reconstruction: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, 2011-2014. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (06) 502-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nelson JA, Stransky CA, Fischer JP, Fosnot J, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Reexamining free flap breast reconstruction in the community and university setting: is there a difference?. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (Suppl. 02) S171-S174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Okada A, Pereira DD, Montag E. et al. Optimizing outcomes in free flap breast reconstruction in the community hospital setting: a stepwise approach to DIEP/SIEA flap procedures with banking a hemiabdominal flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (07) 474-482
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 de Wildt RP, Enajat M, Sawor JH, Fresow RN, Nanhekhan LV, van der Hulst RR. The unilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: comparing university to community hospital. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012; 46 (3-4): 159-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gusenoff JA, Vega SJ, Jiang S. et al. Free tissue transfer: comparison of outcomes between university hospitals and community hospitals. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (03) 671-675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Myers LL. Outcomes comparison of head and neck free tissue transfers in three different hospital populations. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (08) 593-597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Billig JI, Lu Y, Momoh AO, Chung KC. A nationwide analysis of cost variation for autologous free flap breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (11) 1039-1047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Tamplen ML, Tamplen J, Torrecillas V. et al. Does a standalone cancer center improve head and neck microsurgical outcomes?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (04) 252-256
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Koh K, Goh TLH, Song CT. et al. Free versus pedicled perforator flaps for lower extremity reconstruction: a multicenter comparison of institutional practices and outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (08) 572-580
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Weckx A, Loomans N, Lenssen O. Perforator free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: a single-center low-volume experience. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 123 (04) 429-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jones NF, Jarrahy R, Song JI, Kaufman MR, Markowitz B. Postoperative medical complications–not microsurgical complications–negatively influence the morbidity, mortality, and true costs after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2053-2060
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kwok AC, Edwards K, Donato DP. et al. Operative time and flap failure in unilateral and bilateral free flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (06) 428-435
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Offodile II AC, Aherrera A, Wenger J, Rajab TK, Guo L. Impact of increasing operative time on the incidence of early failure and complications following free tissue transfer? A risk factor analysis of 2,008 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (01) 12-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MG, Richart T. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2006; 2 (01) 70-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Parhar HS, Chang BA, Durham JS, Anderson DW, Hayden RE, Prisman E. Post-acute care use after major head and neck oncologic surgery with microvascular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2018; 128 (11) 2532-2538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brady JS, Govindan A, Crippen MM. et al. Impact of diabetes on free flap surgery of the head and neck: a NSQIP analysis. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (05) 504-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Valentini V, Cassoni A, Marianetti TM. et al. Diabetes as main risk factor in head and neck reconstructive surgery with free flaps. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (04) 1080-1084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Town RJ, Wholey DR, Feldman RD, Burns LR. Hospital consolidation and racial/income disparities in health insurance coverage. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26 (04) 1170-1180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cannady SB, Hatten KM, Bur AM. et al. Use of free tissue transfer in head and neck cancer surgery and risk of overall and serious complication(s): an American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project analysis of free tissue transfer to the head and neck. Head Neck 2017; 39 (04) 702-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Shen AY, Lonie S, Lim K, Farthing H, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. Free flap monitoring, salvage, and failure timing: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (03) 300-308
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar