CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2021; 13(02): e163-e169
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735955
Research Article

Current Scope of Online Ophthalmology Education and Curriculum Impact Due to COVID-19

Patrick S. Y. Lee
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Pavlina S. Kemp
2   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Lisa D. Kelly
3   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Jamie B. Rosenberg
4   Department of Ophthalmology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
,
JoAnn A. Giaconi
5   Department of Ophthalmology, Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
,
Emily B. Graubart
6   Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Daniel W. Knoch
7   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
,
Rukhsana G. Mirza
8   Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Prithvi S. Sankar
9   Department of Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Anju Goyal
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
› Author Affiliations
Funding Financial support was provided by Kresge Eye Institute for the presentation of this work at the AUPO 2021 Annual Meeting (to A Goyal); Fellowship support was provided by National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute NIH/NEI F30-EY025923 (to P.S.Y.L.).

Abstract

Objective Abrupt changes in ophthalmology education caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in novel online curriculum development. The aims of this study were to identify (1) the scope of online curricula implemented both prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) perception of educators on these online modalities; and (3) early lessons from online implementation that may guide future curricular planning.

Methods Implementation of online curricula was evaluated by using a national online survey of Ophthalmology Directors of Medical Student Education (DMSE) via Qualtrics software.

Participants Medical Student Educators of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) were surveyed.

Results Fifty responses were collected, representing a 64.9% response rate. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 44% of institutions had no online components in their courses, but 78.3% of institutions reported increasing online components in response to the pandemic. Required courses were significantly associated both with having implemented online components before the pandemic and implementing online-only versions of these courses in response to the pandemic. The three most popular modalities used for online teaching were lectures, interactive cases, and problem-based learning, with a median satisfaction of 4.0, 4.32, and 4.35, (out of five) respectively. The least popular modalities used were online teaching of physical exam skills and telemedicine, both with a median satisfaction of 2.5. Median overall educator satisfaction with online teaching was four (out of five). The most common weakness related to online teaching was the lack of effective physical exam skills training.

Conclusion Our data demonstrate that most institutions successfully shifted their ophthalmology curriculum to a virtual and online version in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. DMSEs adapted quickly, transitioning in-person clinical courses, and extracurricular activities to online formats. Overall, educator satisfaction with online curricula was high. Integration of online curricula provides the opportunity to enrich institutional curriculums and overcome limitations imposed by decreasing curriculum time. This study reveals an early window into the utilization, strengths, and weaknesses of online ophthalmology education, which can serve as a guiding point to enhance ophthalmology curriculum development.



Publication History

Received: 19 April 2021

Accepted: 22 June 2021

Article published online:
22 November 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Moxon NR, Goyal A, Giaconi JA. et al. The State of Ophthalmology Medical Student Education in the United States: an update. Ophthalmology 2020; 127 (11) 1451-1453
  • 2 Kalina RE, Van Dyk HJ, Weinstein GW. Ophthalmology teaching in medical schools. J Med Educ 1981; 56 (02) 143-145
  • 3 Albert DM, Bartley GB. A proposal to improve ophthalmic education in medical schools. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (06) 1157-1159
  • 4 Kemp N, Grieve R. Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 1278
  • 5 Childs S, Blenkinsopp E, Hall A, Walton G. Effective e-learning for health professionals and students–barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature–findings from the HeXL project. Health Info Libr J 2005; 22 (Suppl. 02) 20-32
  • 6 Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Thomas KG, Thompson WG. Adapting web-based instruction to residents' knowledge improves learning efficiency: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23 (07) 985-990
  • 7 da Cruz JA, Sandy NS, Passerotti CC. et al. Does training laparoscopic skills in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance?. J Endourol 2010; 24 (11) 1845-1849
  • 8 Friedl R, Höppler H, Ecard K. et al. Comparative evaluation of multimedia driven, interactive, and case-based teaching in heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82 (05) 1790-1795
  • 9 Grubbs Jr JR, Mian SI. Advising Students Interested in Ophthalmology: a Summary of the Evidence. Ophthalmology 2016; 123 (07) 1406-1410
  • 10 Chatziralli I, Ventura CV, Touhami S. et al. Transforming ophthalmic education into virtual learning during COVID-19 pandemic: a global perspective. Eye (Lond) 2020; DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-1080-0.
  • 11 Braun PX, Encandela J, Kombo N. Innovations in ophthalmology education: a particular instantiation of general principles. Med Sci Educ 2020; 1–5: 1-5
  • 12 Pathipati AS, Azad TD, Jethwani K. Telemedical education: training digital natives in telemedicine. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (07) e193
  • 13 DeVaro SN, Uner OE, Khalifa YM, Graubart EB. Ophthalmology education in COVID-19: a remote elective for medical students. J Acad Ophthalmol 2020; 12 (02) e165-e170
  • 14 Tsui E, Wells MB, Mohamed M, Felix CM, Giaconi JA. Virtual ophthalmology rotations-a real possibility during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Acad Ophthalmol 2020; 12: e195-e199
  • 15 Quillen DA, Harper RA, Haik BG. Medical student education in ophthalmology: crisis and opportunity. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (11) 1867-1868
  • 16 Shah M, Knoch D, Waxman E. The state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States and Canada, 2012 through 2013. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (06) 1160-1163
  • 17 Chao TN, Frost AS, Brody RM. et al. Creation of an interactive virtual surgical rotation for undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 2021; 78 (01) 346-350
  • 18 Manalo TA, Higgins MI, Pettitt-Schieber B, Pettitt BJ, Mehta A, Hartsell LM. A strategy for undergraduate medical education in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 2021; 78 (03) 746-750
  • 19 Adusumilli NC, Kalen J, Hausmann K, Friedman AJ. Dermatology applicant perspectives of a virtual visiting rotation in the era of COVID-19. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 84 (06) 1699-1701
  • 20 Kahn JM, Sandhu N, von Eyben R. et al. Radiation oncology virtual education rotation (ROVER) for medical students. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021;S0360-3016(21)00359-X
  • 21 Wilcha RJ. Effectiveness of virtual medical teaching during the COVID-19 crisis: systematic review. JMIR Med Educ 2020; 6 (02) e20963