J Wrist Surg 2022; 11(04): 316-321
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736605
Scientific Article

Wound Complications with Multiple Wrist Incisions in Distal Radius Reconstruction

1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Nicole Sgromolo
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
,
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
3   Clinical Investigation Facility, Travis Air Force Base, California
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Placement and spacing of skin incisions are important for maintaining soft tissue perfusion and viability, particularly in the setting of local trauma.

Question/Purpose The aim of this article is to determine if multiple skin incisions in the surgical management of distal radius fractures result in an increased risk of postoperative wound complications, particularly in the setting of high-energy mechanisms of injury with substantial initial displacement and associated soft-tissue insult that require multiple incisions for distal radius reconstruction.

Patients and Methods A multicenter, retrospective chart review was performed for all adult patients who underwent open reduction, internal fixation of a closed distal radius fracture with multiple (≥2) hand, and wrist incisions with minimum follow-up of 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures included wound healing complications such as partial or complete skin necrosis, dehiscence, delayed healing, and superficial or deep infections.

Results For 118 wrists, a total of 305 incisions were utilized, averaging 2.6 incisions per patient (range: 2–6) with the flexor carpi radialis and dorsal distal radius approaches occurring in 86 and 78% of cases, respectively. One patient was identified as having a pyogenic granuloma along an incision. However, two patients were identified as having wound concerns, including fracture blisters (n = 1) and wound margin epidermolysis (n = 1) along the incision. There were no cases of skin bridge necrosis, delayed healing, wound dehiscence, or infection.

Conclusions There is no increased risk of wound healing complications with the use of multiple skin incisions (≥2) in the surgical management of distal radius fractures, afforded by the abundant and robust angiosomes around the wrist. Surgeons should have the confidence to utilize the necessary number of skin incisions to effectively reconstruct distal radius fractures.



Publication History

Received: 07 June 2021

Accepted: 10 September 2021

Article published online:
31 October 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (05) 908-915
  • 2 Ilyas AM. Surgical approaches to the distal radius. Hand (N Y) 2011; 6 (01) 8-17
  • 3 He JJ, Blazar P. Management of high energy distal radius injuries. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019; 12 (03) 379-385
  • 4 Bonar SK, Marsh JL. Tibial plafond fractures: changing principles of treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1994; 2 (06) 297-305
  • 5 Müller ME, Bandi W, Schatzker J. Manual of Internal Fixation: Techniques Recommended by the AO Group. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer; 1979
  • 6 Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (Suppl. 01) S1-S170
  • 7 Hozack BA, Tosti RJ. Fragment-specific fixation in distal radius fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019; 12 (02) 190-197
  • 8 Graff S, Jupiter J. Fracture of the distal radius: classification of treatment and indications for external fixation. Injury 1994; 25 (Suppl. 04) S-D14-25
  • 9 Khan SK, Gozzard C. Union of an intra-articular distal radius fracture after successive failures of three locking plates: a case report. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 2012; 7 (01) 45-50
  • 10 Rozental TD, Blazar PE. Functional outcome and complications after volar plating for dorsally displaced, unstable fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (03) 359-365
  • 11 Cunningham DJ, Baumgartner RE, Federer AE, Richard MJ, Mithani SK. Matched cohort study of wound-healing complications in patients with and without diabetes mellitus after primary open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2019; 1: 2-5
  • 12 Howard JL, Agel J, Barei DP, Benirschke SK, Nork SE. A prospective study evaluating incision placement and wound healing for tibial plafond fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22 (05) 299-305 , discussion 305–306
  • 13 Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 2003; 83 (03) 835-870
  • 14 Inoue Y, Taylor GI. The angiosomes of the forearm: anatomic study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (02) 195-210
  • 15 Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 1987; 40 (02) 113-141
  • 16 Taylor GI. The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30 (03) 331-342 , v
  • 17 Rhee PC, Medoff RJ, Shin AY. Complex distal radius fractures: An anatomic algorithm for surgical management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (02) 77-88
  • 18 Huish Jr EG, Coury JG, Ibrahim MA, Trzeciak MA. Radiographic outcomes of dorsal distraction distal radius plating for fractures with dorsal marginal impaction. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13 (03) 346-349
  • 19 Knirk JL, Jupiter JB. Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (05) 647-659
  • 20 Taylor KF, Parks BG, Segalman KA. Biomechanical stability of a fixed-angle volar plate versus fragment-specific fixation system: cyclic testing in a C2-type distal radius cadaver fracture model. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (03) 373-381