PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12(05): 1061-1073
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739518
Research Article

Clinician and Health Care Leaders' Experiences with—and Perceptions of—COVID-19 Documentation Reduction Policies and Practices

Amanda J. Moy
1   Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
,
Jessica M. Schwartz
2   Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States
,
Jennifer Withall
2   Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States
,
Eugene Lucas
1   Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
3   NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, United States
,
Kenrick D. Cato
2   Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States
3   NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, United States
4   Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
,
S. Trent Rosenbloom
5   Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Kevin Johnson
5   Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Judy Murphy
6   Twin Cities, Minnesota, United States
,
Don E. Detmer
7   Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
,
Sarah Collins Rossetti
1   Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
2   Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States
› Institutsangaben Funding The 25 × 5 Symposium was supported through the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) grant 1R13LM013581-01 and co-sponsored by AMIA. The co-authors are also supported through training grants from the NLM 5T15LM007079 and the National Institute for Nursing Research (NINR) 5T32NR007969.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Substantial strategies to reduce clinical documentation were implemented by health care systems throughout the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at national and local levels. This natural experiment provides an opportunity to study the impact of documentation reduction strategies on documentation burden among clinicians and other health professionals in the United States.

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess clinicians' and other health care leaders' experiences with and perceptions of COVID-19 documentation reduction strategies and identify which implemented strategies should be prioritized and remain permanent post-pandemic.

Methods We conducted a national survey of clinicians and health care leaders to understand COVID-19 documentation reduction strategies implemented during the pandemic using snowball sampling through professional networks, listservs, and social media. We developed and validated a 19-item survey leveraging existing post-COVID-19 policy and practice recommendations proposed by Sinsky and Linzer. Participants rated reduction strategies for impact on documentation burden on a scale of 0 to 100. Free-text responses were thematically analyzed.

Results Of the 351 surveys initiated, 193 (55%) were complete. Most participants were informaticians and/or clinicians and worked for a health system or in academia. A majority experienced telehealth expansion (81.9%) during the pandemic, which participants also rated as highly impactful (60.1–61.5) and preferred that it remain (90.5%). Implemented at lower proportions, documenting only pertinent positives to reduce note bloat (66.1 ± 28.3), changing compliance rules and performance metrics to eliminate those without evidence of net benefit (65.7 ± 26.3), and electronic health record (EHR) optimization sprints (64.3 ± 26.9) received the highest impact scores compared with other strategies presented; support for these strategies widely ranged (49.7–63.7%).

Conclusion The results of this survey suggest there are many perceived sources of and solutions for documentation burden. Within strategies, we found considerable support for telehealth, documenting pertinent positives, and changing compliance rules. We also found substantial variation in the experience of documentation burden among participants.

Keywords

electronic health records - documentation burden - physician - nurse - survey

Author Contributions

A. J. M., S. C. R., and J. M. S. initiated the project, methods, and analysis plan. A. J. M. drafted the manuscript and conducted the quantitative analysis. A. J. M. and J. W. conducted the qualitative analysis. J. M. S. and A. J. M. led the survey development and distribution. J. M. S., E. L., K. D. C., J. W., J. M., S. T. R., and S. C. R. contributed to edits. All members of the 25 × 5 Steering Committee contributed as authors, tested the survey instrument, provided conceptual feedback, and approved the final manuscript.


Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed by the Columbia University Irving Medical Center Institutional Review Board.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Juli 2021

Angenommen: 30. September 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. November 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 HealthIT.gov. Strategy on reducing burden relating to the use of health IT and EHRs [Internet]. Cited June 20, 2020 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/usability-and-provider-burden/strategy-reducing-burden-relating-use-health-it-and-ehrs
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD. et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med 2017; 15 (05) 419-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L. et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165 (11) 753-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Roumeliotis N, Parisien G, Charette S, Arpin E, Brunet F, Jouvet P. Reorganizing care with the implementation of electronic medical records: a time-motion study in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2018; 19 (04) e172-e179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Schenk E, Schleyer R, Jones CR, Fincham S, Daratha KB, Monsen KA. Time motion analysis of nursing work in ICU, telemetry and medical-surgical units. J Nurs Manag 2017; 25 (08) 640-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Yen PY, Kellye M, Lopetegui M. et al. Nurses' time allocation and multitasking of nursing activities: a time motion study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018; 2018: 1137-1146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Collins S, Couture B, Kang MJ. et al. Quantifying and visualizing nursing flowsheet documentation burden in acute and critical care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018; 2018: 348-357
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Overhage JM, McCallie Jr D. Physician time spent using the electronic health record during outpatient encounters: a descriptive study. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172 (03) 169-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kroth PJ, Morioka-Douglas N, Veres S. et al. Association of electronic health record design and use factors with clinician stress and burnout. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (08) e199609
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Melnick ER, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky CA. et al. The association between perceived electronic health record usability and professional burnout among US physicians. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95 (03) 476-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Topaz M, Ronquillo C, Peltonen LM. et al. Nurse informaticians report low satisfaction and multi-level concerns with electronic health records: results from an international survey. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2017; 2016: 2016-2025
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gluckman TJ, Vavricek JJ. Streamlining evaluation and management payment to reduce clinician burden. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2019; 12 (04) e005426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T. Medical Informatics Committee of the American College of Physicians. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162 (04) 301-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From Triple to Quadruple Aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12 (06) 573-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bachynsky N. Implications for policy: the Triple Aim, Quadruple Aim, and interprofessional collaboration. Nurs Forum 2020; 55 (01) 54-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Reeves JJ, Hollandsworth HM, Torriani FJ. et al. Rapid response to COVID-19: health informatics support for outbreak management in an academic health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (06) 853-859
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Grange ES, Neil EJ, Stoffel M. et al. Responding to COVID-19: the UW Medicine Information Technology Services experience. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (02) 265-275
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 HHS.gov. Telehealth: delivering care safely during COVID-19 [Internet]. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/telehealth/index.html. Cited April 24, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sinsky C, Linzer M. Practice and policy reset post-COVID-19: reversion, transition, or transformation?. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39 (08) 1405-1411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cuomo GA. No. 202.10: continuing temporary suspension and modification of laws relating to the disaster emergency. Available at: https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/no-20210-continuing-temporary-suspension-and-modification-laws-relating-disaster-emergency. Cited April 24, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Qualtrics. Qualtrics XM // The Leading Experience Management Software. Qualtrics. 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 AMIA. Informatics Professionals. Leading the Way [Internet]. Available at: https://www.amia.org/. Cited April 24, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29 (05) 489-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sengstack PP, Adrian B, David R-B, Boyd L, Davis A, Hook M. et al. The six domains of burden: a conceptual framework to address the burden of documentation in the electronic health record. Position Paper of the American Nursing Informatics Association Board of Directors. Available at: https://www.ache.org/-/media/ache/about-ache/corporate-partners/the-six-domains-of-burden_cerner-documentation.pdf. Cited May 1, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Temesgen ZM, DeSimone DC, Mahmood M, Libertin CR, Varatharaj Palraj BR, Berbari EF. Health care after the COVID-19 pandemic and the influence of telemedicine. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95 (9S): S66-S68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hincapié MA, Gallego JC, Gempeler A, Piñeros JA, Nasner D, Escobar MF. Implementation and usefulness of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. J Prim Care Community Health 2020; 11: 2150132720980612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lee NT, Karsten J, Roberts J. Removing regulatory barriers to telehealth before and after COVID-10. Accessed August 22, 2021 at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/removing-regulatory-barriers-to-telehealth-before-and-after-covid-19/. Published May 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lieneck C, Garvey J, Collins C, Graham D, Loving C, Pearson R. Rapid telehealth implementation during the COVID-19 global pandemic: a rapid review. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8 (04) 517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Johnson KB, Neuss MJ, Detmer DE. Electronic health records and clinician burnout: a story of three eras. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 967-973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar