Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Urología Colombiana / Colombian Urology Journal 2021; 30(04): e319-e326
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740268
Artículo de Revisión

Análisis bibliométrico de la incontinencia urinaria masculina. Una mirada de los últimos 20 años

Bibliometric Analysis of Urinary Incontinence. An Overview of the Last 20 Years
Catalina Sánchez Basto 
1   Clínica Nueva El Lago, Bogotá, Colombia
,
Adriana Chaves Parra 
2   Uronorte, Cúcuta, Norte de Santander, Colombia
,
Catalina Osorio Ospino 
3   Clínica Comfamiliar Risaralda, Risaralda, Colombia
,
María Paula Saenz Becerra 
4   Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Cundinamarca, Colombia
,
Johanna Vega 
5   Hospital de la Samaritana, Cundinamarca, Colombia
,
Daisy Ximena Saavedra 
6   Cooperativa Especializada de Servicios Urológicos del Tolima (Urotol), Ibagué, Tolima, Colombia
,
Melanie López de Mesa 
7   Hospital San José, Bogotá, Colombia
,
Irma A. Ospina-Galeano 
8   Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
,
Catalina Solano Mendoza 
9   Serivicio de Urología, Uroclin, Medellín, Colombia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Resúmen

Introducción y Objetivo En las últimas décadas, la incidencia y prevalencia de la incontinencia urinaria han venido en aumento. Existen numerosas publicaciones sobre este tema, se han introducido nuevos dispositivos, y se han modificado las líneas de manejo de esta patología. El objetivo de este estudio es realizar un análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones sobre incontinencia urinaria masculina en las revistas indexadas.

Métodos Se realizó un análisis bibliométrico descriptivo de corte retrospectivo de la literatura médica disponible en la base de datos Web of Science (WOS) en relación con incontinencia urinaria masculina entre 2002 y 2020. Por medio de la WOS, se obtuvieron las variables a analizar, y se elaboraron tablas y gráficas en el programa Microsoft Office Excel 2017.

Resultados Encontramos un total de 498 publicaciones en 88 revistas. Hubo un crecimiento exponencial de las publicaciones a partir de 2006. Las 3 revistas con mayor porcentaje de publicaciones fueron: J Urol, con 25,2% (125), Neurol Urodyn, con 16,5% (82), European Urology Journal, con 11,1% (55); sólo 5 de las 20 revistas con más publicaciones tuvieron un factor de impacto ≥ 3. El país que tuvo mayor porcentaje fue Estados Unidos con 21,2% (105), seguido por países europeos. En América Latina, el país con mayor número de publicaciones fue Brasil, con 2,6% (13). No se encontraron estudios colombianos con esta búsqueda específica.

Conclusión Este es el primer estudio bibliométrico sobre incontinencia urinaria masculina. Con el tiempo, han aumentado las publicaciones acerca de este tema, y la mayoría está concentrada en revistas de Estados Unidos y Europa. No es predominante la publicación en revistas de alto factor de impacto, y es muy baja la cantidad de publicaciones que aporta Colombia y los demás países latinoamericanos.

Abstract

Introduction In the last decades, the incidence and prevalence of urinary incontinence have been increasing. There are many publications about this subject, there are new devices, and the treatment of this condition has changed with time. The objective of the present study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of the publications about male urinary incontinence in the indexed journals.

Methods We performed a retrospective descriptive bibliometric analysis of the medical literature available on the Web of Science (WOS) database about male urinary incontinence between 2002 and 2020. Through the WOS database, the variables to be analyzed were obtained, and tables and graphs were created using the Microsoft Office Excel 2017.

Results We found 498 publications in 88 journals. Since 2006, there has been an exponential growth in publications. The 3 journals with the highest percentage of publications were: J Urol, with 25.1% (125), Neurol Urodyn, with 16.5% (82), European Urology Journal, with 11.4% (57); only 5 of the 20 journals with the highest number of publications had an impact factor ≥ 3. The country with the highest percentage of publications was the United States with 21,2% (105), followed by European countries. In Latin America, the country with the highest number of publications was Brazil, with 2,6% (13). No Colombian studies were found with this specific research.

Conclusion The present is the first bibliometric analysis on male urinary incontinence. Over time, publications on this topic have increased, and most of them are concentrated in journals from the United States and Europe. The publication in journals with a high impact factor is not predominant, and the number of publications from Colombia and other Latin American countries is very low.

Palabras Clave

incontinencia urinaria - análisis bibliométrico - bibliométrico - base de datos Web of Science - análisis de visualización - análisis de citaciones

Keywords

urinary incontinence - bibliometric analysis - bibliometric - Web of Science database - visualization analysis - citation analysis


Publication History

Received: 26 October 2020

Accepted: 02 July 2021

Article published online:
22 December 2021

© 2021. Sociedad Colombiana de Urología. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referencias

  • 1 Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L. et al; Members of Committees, Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29 (01) 213-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hester AG, Kretschmer A, Badlani G. Male Incontinence: The Etiology or Basis of Treatment. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 3 (4-5): 377-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Helfand BT, Smith AR, Lai HH. et al; LURN. Prevalence and Characteristics of Urinary Incontinence in a Treatment Seeking Male Prospective Cohort: Results from the LURN Study. J Urol 2018; 200 (02) 397-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Shamliyan TA, Wyman JF, Ping R, Wilt TJ, Kane RL. Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions. Rev Urol 2009; 11 (03) 145-165
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hübner W. et al. Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 2011; 59 (06) 985-996
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Averbeck MA, Woodhouse C, Comiter C. et al. Surgical treatment of post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in adult men: Report from the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38 (01) 398-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Helfand BT, Smith AR, Lai HH. et al; LURN. Prevalence and Characteristics of Urinary Incontinence in a Treatment Seeking Male Prospective Cohort: Results from the LURN Study. J Urol 2018; 200 (02) 397-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cornu J-N, Peyrat L, Haab F. Update in management of male urinary incontinence: injectables, balloons, minimally invasive approaches. Curr Opin Urol 2013; 23 (06) 536-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 InCitesTM Journal Citation Reports. Journal data filtered by selected year JCR year: 2014. Thomson Reuters 2015. SCIE, SSCI.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, Van Den Berg J. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2010; 61 (12) 2405-2416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics 2010; 4 (04) 629-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Matta R, Hird AE, Saskin R. et al. Is there an association between urinary incontinence and mortality? A retrospective cohort study. J Urol 2020; 203 (03) 591-597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sahin-Onat S, Unsal-Delialioğlu S, Güzel O, Uçar D. Relationship between urinary incontinence and quality of life/depression in elderly patients. J Gerontol 2014; 5 (03) 86-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chong JT, Simma-Chiang V. A historical perspective and evolution of the treatment of male urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2018; 37 (03) 1169-1175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Liu JS, Hofer MD, Milose J. et al. Male sling and artificial urethral sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence among certifying american urologists. Urology 2016; 87: 95-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gao Y, Qu B, Shen Y. et al. Bibliometric profile of neurogenic bladder in the literature: a 20-year bibliometric analysis. Neural Regen Res 2015; 10 (05) 797-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cerruto MA, D'Elia C, Artibani W. Continence and complications rates after male slings as primary surgery for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2013; 85 (02) 92-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kretschmer A, Nitti V. Surgical Treatment of Male Postprostatectomy Incontinence: Current Concepts. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 3 (4-5): 364-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Upham SP, Small H. Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics 2010; 83 (01) 15-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar