J Knee Surg 2023; 36(06): 596-604
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740392
Original Article

Biomechanical Comparison of Kinematic and Mechanical Knee Alignment Techniques in a Computer Simulation Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty Model

Young Dong Song
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Shinichiro Nakamura
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Kohei Nishitani
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Hiromu Ito
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
2   Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Yugo Morita
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Yusuke Yamawaki
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
,
Shuichi Matsuda
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Several concepts may be used to restore normal knee kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. One is a kinematically aligned (KA) technique, which restores the native joint line and limb alignment, and the other is the use of a medial pivot knee (MPK) design, with a ball and socket joint in the medial compartment. This study aimed to compare motions, contact forces, and contact stress between mechanically aligned (MA) and KA (medial tilt 3° [KA3] and 5° [KA5]) models in MPK. An MPK design was virtually implanted with MA, KA3, and KA5 in a validated musculoskeletal computer model of a healthy knee, and the simulation of motion and contact forces was implemented. Anteroposterior (AP) positions, mediolateral positions, external rotation angles of the femoral component relative to the tibial insert, and tibiofemoral contact forces were evaluated at different knee flexion angles. Contact stresses on the tibial insert were calculated using finite element analysis. The AP position at the medial compartment was consistent for all models. From 0° to 120°, the femoral component in KA models showed larger posterior movement at the lateral compartment (0.3, 6.8, and 17.7 mm in MA, KA3, and KA5 models, respectively) and larger external rotation (4.2°, 12.0°, and 16.8° in the MA, KA3, and KA5 models, respectively) relative to the tibial component. Concerning the mediolateral position of the femoral component, the KA5 model was positioned more medially. The contact forces at the lateral compartment of all models were larger than those at the medial compartment at >60° of knee flexion. The peak contact stresses on the tibiofemoral joint at 90° and 120° of knee flexion were higher in the KA models. However, the peak contact stresses of the KA models at every flexion angle were <20 MPa. The KA technique in MPK can successfully achieve near-normal knee kinematics; however, there may be a concern for higher contact stresses on the tibial insert.



Publication History

Received: 29 May 2021

Accepted: 22 October 2021

Article published online:
10 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Schütz P, Taylor WR, Postolka B. et al. Kinematic evaluation of the GMK sphere implant during gait activities: a dynamic videofluoroscopy study. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (11) 2337-2347
  • 2 Moonot P, Mu S, Railton GT, Field RE, Banks SA. Tibiofemoral kinematic analysis of knee flexion for a medial pivot knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (08) 927-934
  • 3 Blaha JD. The rationale for a total knee implant that confers anteroposterior stability throughout range of motion. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (4, Suppl 1): 22-26
  • 4 Fan CY, Hsieh JT, Hsieh MS, Shih YC, Lee CH. Primitive results after medial-pivot knee arthroplasties: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (03) 492-496
  • 5 Mannan K, Scott G. The medial rotation total knee replacement: a clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of six years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (06) 750-756
  • 6 Bae DK, Song SJ, Cho SD. Clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot prosthesis a comparative study between the cruciate retaining and sacrificing. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (05) 693-698
  • 7 Øhrn FD, Gøthesen Ø, Låstad Lygre SH. et al. Decreased survival of medial pivot designs compared with cruciate-retaining designs in TKA without patellar resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478 (06) 1207-1218
  • 8 Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. Clinical outcome of medial pivot compared with press-fit condylar sigma cruciate-retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (10) 3016-3023
  • 9 Shakespeare D, Ledger M, Kinzel V. Flexion after total knee replacement. A comparison between the Medial Pivot knee and a posterior stabilised implant. Knee 2006; 13 (05) 371-373
  • 10 Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (09) 857-863
  • 11 Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Rudert M, Roth J, Hull ML. How frequent is rotational mismatch within 0° ± 10° in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (12) e1515-e1520
  • 12 Howell SM, Chen J, Hull ML. Variability of the location of the tibial tubercle affects the rotational alignment of the tibial component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2288-2295
  • 13 Hutt J, Massé V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA. Functional joint line obliquity after kinematic total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (01) 29-34
  • 14 Ishikawa M, Kuriyama S, Ito H, Furu M, Nakamura S, Matsuda S. Kinematic alignment produces near-normal knee motion but increases contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: a case study on a single implant design. Knee 2015; 22 (03) 206-212
  • 15 Tanaka Y, Nakamura S, Kuriyama S. et al. Medial tilting of the joint line in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty increases contact force and stress. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2018; 53: 54-59
  • 16 Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (07) 907-913
  • 17 Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ishida K, Hayashi S, Hashimoto S, Kuroda R. Radiological and clinical comparison of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (05) 640-646
  • 18 Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Hull ML. Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (12) 3678-3684
  • 19 Courtney PM, Lee GC. Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (06) 2028-2032.e1 , e2021
  • 20 Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (6, Suppl): 39-43
  • 21 Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1588-1596
  • 22 Laende EK, Richardson CG, Dunbar MJ. A randomized controlled trial of tibial component migration with kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment using computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B (08) 929-940
  • 23 Klasan A, de Steiger R, Holland S, Hatton A, Vertullo CJ, Young SW. Similar risk of revision after kinematically aligned, patient-specific instrumented total knee arthroplasty, and all other total knee arthroplasty: combined results from the Australian and New Zealand joint replacement registries. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (10) 2872-2877
  • 24 Mizu-Uchi H, Colwell Jr CW, Flores-Hernandez C, Fregly BJ, Matsuda S, D'Lima DD. Patient-specific computer model of dynamic squatting after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (05) 870-874
  • 25 Tanaka Y, Nakamura S, Kuriyama S. et al. How exactly can computer simulation predict the kinematics and contact status after TKA? Examination in individualized models. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2016; 39: 65-70
  • 26 LaPrade RF, Bollom TS, Wentorf FA, Wills NJ, Meister K. Mechanical properties of the posterolateral structures of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (09) 1386-1391
  • 27 Sugita T, Amis AA. Anatomic and biomechanical study of the lateral collateral and popliteofibular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (04) 466-472
  • 28 Warren LA, Marshall JL, Girgis F. The prime static stabilizer of the medical side of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56 (04) 665-674
  • 29 Blankevoort L, Kuiper JH, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. J Biomech 1991; 24 (11) 1019-1031
  • 30 Harner CD, Xerogeanes JW, Livesay GA. et al. The human posterior cruciate ligament complex: an interdisciplinary study. Ligament morphology and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23 (06) 736-745
  • 31 Robinson JR, Bull AM, Amis AA. Structural properties of the medial collateral ligament complex of the human knee. J Biomech 2005; 38 (05) 1067-1074
  • 32 Kuriyama S, Ishikawa M, Furu M, Ito H, Matsuda S. Malrotated tibial component increases medial collateral ligament tension in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (12) 1658-1666
  • 33 Kuriyama S, Ishikawa M, Nakamura S, Furu M, Ito H, Matsuda S. No condylar lift-off occurs because of excessive lateral soft tissue laxity in neutrally aligned total knee arthroplasty: a computer simulation study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (08) 2517-2524
  • 34 Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (420) 213-219
  • 35 Thienpont E, Paternostre F, Pietsch M, Hafez M, Howell S. Total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instruments improves function and restores limb alignment in patients with extra-articular deformity. Knee 2013; 20 (06) 407-411
  • 36 Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik KT, Hull ML. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2271-2280
  • 37 Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (03) 1000-1007
  • 38 Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Does malrotation of the tibial and femoral components compromise function in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?. Orthop Clin North Am 2016; 47 (01) 41-50
  • 39 Morra EA, Rosca M, Greenwald JF, Greenwald AS. The influence of contemporary knee design on high flexion: a kinematic comparison with the normal knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (Suppl. 04) 195-201
  • 40 Villa T, Migliavacca F, Gastaldi D, Colombo M, Pietrabissa R. Contact stresses and fatigue life in a knee prosthesis: comparison between in vitro measurements and computational simulations. J Biomech 2004; 37 (01) 45-53
  • 41 Johal P, Williams A, Wragg P, Hunt D, Gedroyc W. Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using ‘interventional’ MRI. J Biomech 2005; 38 (02) 269-276
  • 42 Mu S, Moro-Oka T, Johal P, Hamai S, Freeman MA, Banks SA. Comparison of static and dynamic knee kinematics during squatting. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011; 26 (01) 106-108
  • 43 Khasian M, LaCour MT, Coomer SC, Bolognesi MP, Komistek RD. In vivo knee kinematics for a cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty having both a symmetrical femoral and tibial component. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (06) 1712-1719
  • 44 Alesi D, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Roberti di Sarsina T. et al. In vivo femorotibial kinematics of medial-stabilized total knee arthroplasty correlates to post-operative clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (02) 491-497
  • 45 Kono K, Inui H, Tomita T. et al. Bicruciate-stabilised total knee arthroplasty provides good functional stability during high-flexion weight-bearing activities. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (07) 2096-2103
  • 46 Sekiguchi K, Nakamura S, Nakamura K. et al. Varus alignment after total knee arthroplasty results in greater axial rotation during deep knee bend activity. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2020; 77: 105051
  • 47 Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP. Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 2002; 20 (04) 881-886
  • 48 Nagura T, Matsumoto H, Kiriyama Y, Chaudhari A, Andriacchi TP. Tibiofemoral joint contact force in deep knee flexion and its consideration in knee osteoarthritis and joint replacement. J Appl Biomech 2006; 22 (04) 305-313
  • 49 Smith SM, Cockburn RA, Hemmerich A, Li RM, Wyss UP. Tibiofemoral joint contact forces and knee kinematics during squatting. Gait Posture 2008; 27 (03) 376-386
  • 50 Bedo BLS, Catelli DS, Lamontagne M, Santiago PRP. A custom musculoskeletal model for estimation of medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces during tasks with high knee and hip flexions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2020; 23 (10) 658-663
  • 51 Khasian M, Meccia BA, LaCour MT, Komistek RD. A validated forward solution dynamics mathematical model of the knee joint: can it be an effective alternative for implant evaluation?. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (11) 3289-3299
  • 52 Innocenti B, Bellemans J, Catani F. Deviations from optimal alignment in TKA: is there a biomechanical difference between femoral or tibial component alignment?. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (01) 295-301
  • 53 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149
  • 54 Matziolis G, Adam J, Perka C. Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130 (12) 1487-1491
  • 55 Magnussen RA, Weppe F, Demey G, Servien E, Lustig S. Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (12) 3443-3450
  • 56 Koh YG, Son J, Kwon OR, Kwon SK, Kang KT. Tibiofemoral conformity variation offers changed kinematics and wear performance of customized posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (04) 1213-1223
  • 57 Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (416) 37-57
  • 58 Tanaka Y, Nakamura S, Kuriyama S. et al. Length of anterior cruciate ligament affects knee kinematics and kinetics using a musculoskeletal computer simulation model. J Orthop 2020; 21: 370-374