PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2022; 55(02): 168-173
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740523
Review Article

Penile Prosthesis in Transgender Men after Phalloplasty

Rajveer S. Purohit
1   Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
,
Marissa Kent
1   Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
,
Miroslav L. Djordjevic
1   Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

A penile prosthesis can be successfully implanted after phalloplasty in transgender men to permit sexual intercourse. A prosthesis can be categorized as malleable or inflatable. The most common penile prosthesis implanted after masculinizing genital surgery is the inflatable prosthesis but this can be a challenging operation with high complication rates. Penile prosthesis in transgender patients differs from cis-patients in many respects but one critical difference is the absence of the tough, protective tunica of the corporal body to contain the prosthesis. This causes greater mobility of the prosthesis under the skin and increases the risk of migration and erosion of the device through the skin. In addition, to overcome the absence of a corpora cavernosa, the proximal portion of the prosthesis must be anchored to bone. Complications include injury to the urethra, vascular injury, skin breakdown, infection, device migration, device failure, extrusion, and erosion. There is no robust data on the use of penile prosthesis in transgender men with only multiple reports of small numbers of patients. While successful implantation can improve patients' quality of life, surgeons should counsel patients about the relatively high risk of the need for revision surgery.

Keywords

transgender - phalloplasty - penile implant - testicular prosthesis - surgery


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. Juli 2022

© 2022. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Spizzirri G, Eufrásio R, Lima MCP. et al. Proportion of people identified as transgender and non-binary gender in Brazil. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 2240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wiepjes CM, Nota NM, de Blok CJM. et al. The Amsterdam Cohort of Gender Dysphoria Study (1972-2015): trends in prevalence, treatment, and regrets. J Sex Med 2018; 15 (04) 582-590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Puckett CL, Montie JE. Construction of male genitalia in the transsexual, using a tubed groin flap for the penis and a hydraulic inflation device. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (04) 523-530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bogoras N. Uber die volle plastische Wiederherstellung eines zum Koitus fahigen Penis (Peni plastica totalis). Zentralbl Chir 1936; 22: 1271-1276
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Neuville P, Carnicelli D, Paparel P, Ruffion A, Morel-Journel N. Metoidioplasty with implantation of a specific semirigid prosthesis. J Sex Med 2021; 18 (04) 830-836
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Neuville P, Morel-Journel N, Cabelguenne D, Ruffion A, Paparel P, Terrier JE. First outcomes of the ZSI 475 FtM, a specific prosthesis designed for phalloplasty. J Sex Med 2019; 16 (02) 316-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Blecher GA, Christopher N, Ralph DJ. Prosthetic placement after phalloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2019; 46 (04) 591-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Falcone M, Garaffa G, Gillo A, Dente D, Christopher AN, Ralph DJ. Outcomes of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in 247 patients completing female to male gender reassignment surgery. BJU Int 2018; 121 (01) 139-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Djordjevic ML, Bencic M, Kojovic V. et al. Musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap for phalloplasty in female to male gender affirmation surgery. World J Urol 2019; 37 (04) 631-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kim S, Dennis M, Holland J, Terrell M, Loukas M, Schober J. The anatomy of forearm free flap phalloplasty for transgender surgery. Clin Anat 2018; 31 (02) 145-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hage JJ. Dynaflex prosthesis in total phalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (02) 479-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hoebeke PB, Decaestecker K, Beysens M, Opdenakker Y, Lumen N, Monstrey SM. Erectile implants in female-to-male transsexuals: our experience in 129 patients. Eur Urol 2010; 57 (02) 334-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Neuville P, Morel-Journel N, Maucourt-Boulch D, Ruffion A, Paparel P, Terrier JE. Surgical outcomes of erectile implants after phalloplasty: retrospective analysis of 95 procedures. J Sex Med 2016; 13 (11) 1758-1764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zuckerman JM, Smentkowski K, Gilbert D. et al. Penile prosthesis implantation in patients with a history of total phallic construction. J Sex Med 2015; 12 (12) 2485-2491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Large MC, Gottlieb LJ, Wille MA, DeWolfe M, Bales GT. Novel technique for proximal anchoring of penile prostheses in female-to-male transsexual. Urology 2009; 74 (02) 419-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Salgado CJ, Fein LA, Williams EA, Sood R. Supersonic transporter deformity in transgender men following phalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (01) 225-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 van der Sluis WB, Pigot GLS, Al-Tamimi M. et al. A retrospective cohort study on surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation surgery in transgender men after phalloplasty. Urology 2019; 132: 195-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar