Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Surg J (N Y) 2022; 08(01): e1-e7
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740629
Original Article

Comparison of LRINEC Scoring System with Finger Test and Histopathological Examination for Necrotizing Fasciitis

Farah Naaz Kazi
1   Department of General Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
J.V. Sharma
1   Department of General Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
1   Department of General Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
D. Prashanth
1   Department of General Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
V. Om Pramod Kumar Raja
1   Department of General Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
› Institutsangaben

Funding sources No funding sources have been used.
Preview

Abstract

Background Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent attention. It is clinically difficult to diagnose, linked to severe systemic toxicity, and has poor prognosis. In 2001, Andreasen and coworkers described the “Finger test” for the diagnosis of NF. Subsequent studies have suggested early recognition and management of NF. In this study, we compare the LRINEC—Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis—scoring system with the “Finger test” and histopathological examination for diagnosis of NF.

Results In our study, LRINEC scoring system and Finger test are statistically significant in the diagnosis of NF. Males are more frequently affected, and the most common organism causing NF is Staphylococcus. Histopathology remained the gold standard for diagnosis of NF, while LRINEC score and Finger test were good diagnostic tools for early diagnosis, with sensitivities of 83.33 and 86.11%, respectively.

Conclusion LRINEC laboratory-based scoring system is easy and reliable diagnostic tool though histopathology remains the gold standard. There is statistically significant correlation between histopathology and laboratory criteria. LRINEC test is independently better than bedside Finger test alone or combined LRINEC and bedside Finger test.

Authors' Contribution

All the authors have made substantial contribution to the literature review, data interpretation, and the preparing of the manuscript for submission.


Data Availability Statement

The ethics approval was obtained from Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Pondicherry, while the data compilation was done in Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. Juni 2021

Angenommen: 15. Oktober 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Januar 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA