CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13(01): 080-090
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740920
Research Article

Caries Risk Documentation And Prevention: eMeasures For Dental Electronic Health Records

Suhasini Bangar*
1   Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Ana Neumann*
1   Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Joel M. White
2   Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Alfa Yansane
2   Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Todd R. Johnson
1   Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Gregory W. Olson
1   Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Shwetha V. Kumar
1   Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Krishna K. Kookal
1   Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Aram Kim
3   Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Enihomo Obadan-Udoh
2   Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Elizabeth Mertz
2   Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Kristen Simmons
4   Willamette Dental Group, Hillsboro, Oregon, United States
,
Joanna Mullins
4   Willamette Dental Group, Hillsboro, Oregon, United States
,
Ryan Brandon
4   Willamette Dental Group, Hillsboro, Oregon, United States
,
Muhammad F. Walji
1   Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry at Houston, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Elsbeth Kalenderian
2   Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, United States
3   Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
5   Department of Dental Management, School of Dentistry, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study received funding from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, grant no.: R01DE024166.

Abstract

Background Longitudinal patient level data available in the electronic health record (EHR) allows for the development, implementation, and validations of dental quality measures (eMeasures).

Objective We report the feasibility and validity of implementing two eMeasures. The eMeasures determined the proportion of patients receiving a caries risk assessment (eCRA) and corresponding appropriate risk-based preventative treatments for patients at elevated risk of caries (appropriateness of care [eAoC]) in two academic institutions and one accountable care organization, in the 2019 reporting year.

Methods Both eMeasures define the numerator and denominator beginning at the patient level, populations' specifications, and validated the automated queries. For eCRA, patients who completed a comprehensive or periodic oral evaluation formed the denominator, and patients of any age who received a CRA formed the numerator. The eAoC evaluated the proportion of patients at elevated caries risk who received the corresponding appropriate risk-based preventative treatments.

Results EHR automated queries identified in three sites 269,536 patients who met the inclusion criteria for receiving a CRA. The overall proportion of patients who received a CRA was 94.4% (eCRA). In eAoC, patients at elevated caries risk levels (moderate, high, or extreme) received fluoride preventive treatment ranging from 56 to 93.8%. For patients at high and extreme risk, antimicrobials were prescribed more frequently site 3 (80.6%) than sites 2 (16.7%) and 1 (2.9%).

Conclusion Patient-level data available in the EHRs can be used to implement process-of-care dental eCRA and AoC, eAoC measures identify gaps in clinical practice. EHR-based measures can be useful in improving delivery of evidence-based preventative treatments to reduce risk, prevent tooth decay, and improve oral health.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

Each participating institution obtained respective Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.


* Contributed equally to this article.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 18 February 2021

Accepted: 30 October 2021

Article published online:
19 January 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27 (03) 759-769
  • 2 Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12 (06) 573-576
  • 3 Berwick DM. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med 1989; 320 (01) 53-56
  • 4 Munson B, Vujicic M. Supply of dentists in the United States is likely to grow: Health Policy Institute. Available at: http://www.ada.org/?/media/ADA/Science%20and%20Research/HPI/Files/HPIBrief_1014_1.pdf 2014
  • 5 Franklin A, Gantela S, Shifarraw S. et al. Dashboard visualizations: Supporting real-time throughput decision-making. J Biomed Inform 2017; 71: 211-221
  • 6 Herndon JB, Horton RA, Ruff JC. Findings from a caries risk assessment registry quality improvement initiative in an oral health partnership model. J Public Health Dent 2021
  • 7 Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res 2015; 94 (05) 650-658
  • 8 Dye BA, Thornton-Evans G, Li X, Iafolla TJ. Dental caries and sealant prevalence in children and adolescents in the United States, 2011-2012. NCHS Data Brief 2015; (191) 1-8
  • 9 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Topics & objectives: oral health: oral health of adults: OH-3 reduce the proportion of adults with untreated dental decay: OH-3.1 reduce the proportion of adults aged 35 to 44 with untreated dental decay. Accessed May 16, 2021: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/oral-health/objectives
  • 10 Featherstone JD, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Jenson L, Wolff M, Young DA. Caries risk assessment in practice for age 6 through adult. J Calif Dent Assoc 2007; 35 (10) 703–707-710–713
  • 11 Doméjean S, White JM, Featherstone JD. Validation of the CDA CAMBRA caries risk assessment–a six-year retrospective study. J Calif Dent Assoc 2011; 39 (10) 709-715
  • 12 Chaffee BW, Cheng J, Featherstone JD. Baseline caries risk assessment as a predictor of caries incidence. J Dent 2015; 43 (05) 518-524
  • 13 Fontana M, Carrasco-Labra A, Spallek H, Eckert G, Katz B. Improving caries risk prediction modeling: a call for action. J Dent Res 2020; 99 (11) 1215-1220
  • 14 National Quality Measures Clearinghouse. NQMC measure domain definitions. Accessed 19 Nov, 2020: https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/summaries/domain-definitions/index.html
  • 15 Neumann A, Kalenderian E, Ramoni R. et al. Evaluating quality of dental care among patients with diabetes: adaptation and testing of a dental quality measure in electronic health records. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148 (09) 634-643.e1
  • 16 Neumann A, Kumar S, Bangar S. et al. Tobacco screening and cessation efforts by dental providers: a quality measure evaluation. J Public Health Dent 2019; 79 (02) 93-101
  • 17 Kumar SV, Bangar S, Neumann A. et al. Assessing the validity of existing dental sealant quality measures. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149 (09) 756-764.e1
  • 18 Kumar SV, Yansane A, Neumann A. et al. Measuring sealant placement in children at the dental practice level. J Am Dent Assoc 2020; 151 (10) 745-754
  • 19 Dental Quality Alliance. Caries risk documentation. Accessed November 15, 2020: https://www.ada.org/~/media/ADA/DQA/2020_CariesRiskDocumentation.pdf?la=en
  • 20 Kalenderian E, Ramoni RL, White JM. et al. The development of a dental diagnostic terminology. J Dent Educ 2011; 75 (01) 68-76
  • 21 Dental quality alliance. Accessed Nov 19, 2020: https://www.ada.org/resources/research/dental-quality-alliance
  • 22 Bhardwaj A, Ramoni R, Kalenderian E. et al. Measuring up: Implementing a dental quality measure in the electronic health record context. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147 (01) 35-40
  • 23 Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed.. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1977
  • 24 McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (03) 276-282
  • 25 Schleyer TK, Thyvalikakath TP, Spallek H, Torres-Urquidy MH, Hernandez P, Yuhaniak J. Clinical computing in general dentistry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (03) 344-352
  • 26 Simon L, Obadan-Udoh E, Yansane AI. et al. Improving oral-systemic healthcare through the interoperability of electronic medical and dental records: an exploratory study. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 367-376
  • 27 Kalenderian E, Halamka JD, Spallek H. An EHR with teeth. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 425-429
  • 28 Walji MF, Kalenderian E, Stark PC. et al. BigMouth: a multi-institutional dental data repository. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (06) 1136-1140
  • 29 Stark PC, Kalenderian E, White JM. et al; Consortium for Oral Health-Related Informatics (COHRI). Consortium for oral health-related informatics: improving dental research, education, and treatment. J Dent Educ 2010; 74 (10) 1051-1065
  • 30 Walji MF, Kalenderian E, Piotrowski M. et al. Are three methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83 (05) 361-367
  • 31 Spallek H, Song M, Polk DE, Bekhuis T, Frantsve-Hawley J, Aravamudhan K. Barriers to implementing evidence-based clinical guidelines: a survey of early adopters. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010; 10 (04) 195-206
  • 32 O'Donnell JA, Modesto A, Oakley M, Polk DE, Valappil B, Spallek H. Sealants and dental caries: insight into dentists' behaviors regarding implementation of clinical practice recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144 (04) e24-e30
  • 33 Mertz E, Bolarinwa O, Wides C. et al. Provider attitudes toward the implementation of clinical decision support tools in dental practice. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2015; 15 (04) 152-163
  • 34 Tokede O, Walji M, Ramoni R. et al. Treatment planning in dentistry using an electronic health record: implications for undergraduate education. Eur J Dent Educ 2013; 17 (01) e34-e43
  • 35 White JM, Jenson LE, Gansky SA. et al. Dental students' clinical experience across three successive curricula at one U.S. dental school. J Dent Educ 2017; 81 (04) 366-377
  • 36 Walji MF, Yansane A, Hebballi NB. et al. Finding dental harm to patients through electronic health record-based triggers. JDR Clin Trans Res 2020; 5 (03) 271-277
  • 37 Yansane A, Listl S, Dawda D. et al. Increasing value, reducing waste: tailoring the application of dental sealants according to individual caries risk. J Public Health Dent 2020; 80 (Suppl. 02) S8-S16
  • 38 Neumann A, Obadan-Udoh E, Bangar S. et al. Number of pregnant women at four dental clinics and the care they received: a dental quality eMeasure evaluation. J Dent Educ 2019; 83 (10) 1158-1165
  • 39 Kalenderian E, Ramoni RB, White JM. et al. The importance of using diagnostic codes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112 (01) 4-5
  • 40 Tokede O, White J, Stark PC. et al. Assessing use of a standardized dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record. J Dent Educ 2013; 77 (01) 24-36
  • 41 Yansane A, Tokede O, White J. et al. Utilization and validity of the dental diagnostic system over time in academic and private practice. JDR Clin Trans Res 2019; 4 (02) 143-150
  • 42 Cagetti MG, Bontà G, Cocco F, Lingstrom P, Strohmenger L, Campus G. Are standardized caries risk assessment models effective in assessing actual caries status and future caries increment? A systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18 (01) 123
  • 43 Chaffee BW, Cheng J, Featherstone JD. Baseline caries risk assessment and anti-caries therapy predict caries incidence. J Dent Res 2014; 93 (0B): 190
  • 44 Walsh CJ, Gansky SA, Vaderhobli RM, Fontana M, Rechmann P, White JM. Usability testing of clinical decision support caries risk assessment tools. J Dent Res 2015; 94 (0A): 1080
  • 45 Lin J, Martin J, Yansane A. Reliability testing of caries risk assessment tools with a synthetic database. J Dent Res 2019; 98 (A): 3551
  • 46 Featherstone JDB, Crystal YO, Alston P. et al. A comparison of four caries risk assessment methods. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2021; 2 (15) DOI: 10.3389/froh.2021.656558.
  • 47 Featherstone JDB, Crystal YO, Alston P. et al. Evidence-based caries management for all ages-practical guidelines. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2021;2(14):
  • 48 Young DA, Nový BB, Zeller GG, Hale R, Hart TC, Truelove EL. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs, American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The American Dental Association Caries Classification System for clinical practice: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2015; 146 (02) 79-86
  • 49 Ismail AI, Pitts NB, Tellez M. et al; Authors of International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS). The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) an example of a caries management pathway. BMC Oral Health 2015; 15 (Suppl. 01) S9
  • 50 Featherstone JD, White JM, Hoover CI. et al. A randomized clinical trial of anticaries therapies targeted according to risk assessment (caries management by risk assessment). Caries Res 2012; 46 (02) 118-129
  • 51 White JM, Brandon RG, Mullins JM, Simmons KL, Kottek AM, Mertz EA. Tracking oral health in a standardized, evidence-based, prevention-focused dental care system. J Public Health Dent 2020; 80 (Suppl. 02) S35-S43
  • 52 Slayton RL, Urquhart O, Araujo MWB. et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: a report from the American Dental Association. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149 (10) 837-849
  • 53 White JM, Kalenderian E, Stark PC, Ramoni RL, Vaderhobli R, Walji MF. Evaluating a dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record. J Dent Educ 2011; 75 (05) 605-615
  • 54 Ramoni RB, Etolue J, Tokede O. et al. Adoption of dental innovations: The case of a standardized dental diagnostic terminology. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148 (05) 319-327
  • 55 White JM, Mertz EA, Mullins JM. et al. Developing and testing electronic health record-derived caries indices. Caries Res 2019; 53 (06) 650-658
  • 56 Colak H, Dülgergil CT, Dalli M, Hamidi MM. Early childhood caries update: a review of causes, diagnoses, and treatments. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2013; 4 (01) 29-38
  • 57 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disparities in oral health. Accessed 20 November, 2020: https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/oral_health_disparities/index.htm
  • 58 Dye BA. Dental Caries and Sealant Prevalence in Children and Adolescents in the United States, 2011–2012. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015
  • 59 Anil S, Anand PS. Early childhood caries: prevalence, risk factors, and prevention. Front Pediatr 2017; 5: 157
  • 60 Cheng J, Gregorich SE, Gansky SA. et al. Constructing matched groups in dental observational health disparity studies for causal effects. JDR Clin Trans Res 2020; 5 (01) 82-91
  • 61 SNODDS: dental diagnostic system. Accessed November 21, 2020: http://dentaldiagnosticterminology.org/