Embolic Agents: Coils

Nicholas Xiao; Robert J. Lewandowski

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1740939

Seminars in Interventional Radiology, Table of Contents

Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(01): 113-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740939

Back to the Basics

Embolic Agents: Coils

Authors

Nicholas Xiao

¹Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
Robert J. Lewandowski

¹Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

Abstract

Full Text

References

References
1 Mullan S. Experiences with surgical thrombosis of intracranial berry aneurysms and carotid cavernous fistulas. J Neurosurg 1974; 41 (06) 657-670
2 Gianturco C, Anderson JH, Wallace S. Mechanical devices for arterial occlusion. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975; 124 (03) 428-435
3 Henkes H, Brew S, Miloslavski E, Fischer S, Tavrovski I, Kühne D. The underlying mechanisms of endovascular exclusion of intracranial aneurysms by coils. How important is electrothrombosis?. Interv Neuroradiol 2003; 9 (02) 127-140
4 Yuki I, Lee D, Murayama Y. et al. Thrombus organization and healing in an experimental aneurysm model. Part II. The effect of various types of bioactive bioabsorbable polymeric coils. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (01) 109-120
5 Kauvar DS, Schechtman DW, Thomas SB. et al. Endovascular embolization techniques in a novel swine model of fatal uncontrolled solid organ hemorrhage and coagulopathy. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 70: 143-151
6 Prasad V, Chan RP, Faughnan ME. Embolotherapy of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: efficacy of platinum versus stainless steel coils. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15 (2, Pt 1): 153-160
7 Ferral H. Hydrogel-coated coils: product description and clinical applications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2015; 32 (04) 343-348
8 White JB, Ken CG, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Coils in a nutshell: a review of coil physical properties. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29 (07) 1242-1246
9 Lee CY, Yim MB, Benndorf G. Mechanical detachment of Guglielmi detachable coils after failed electrolytic detachment: rescue from a technical complication. Neurosurgery 2008;63(4, Suppl 2):293–294, discussion 294
10 Pickett GE, Cora A. Electrothermal coil detachment failure in flow diverter-assisted coiling of a small blister aneurysm: technical considerations and possible solutions. Neurointervention 2021; 16 (02) 171-174
11 Lopera JE. Embolization in trauma: principles and techniques. Semin Intervent Radiol 2010; 27 (01) 14-28
12 Nelson PK, Levy DI. Balloon-assisted coil embolization of wide-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: medium-term angiographic and clinical follow-up in 22 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22 (01) 19-26
13 Yasumoto T, Osuga K, Yamamoto H. et al. Long-term outcomes of coil packing for visceral aneurysms: correlation between packing density and incidence of coil compaction or recanalization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (12) 1798-1807
14 Falagas ME, Nikou SA, Siempos II. Infections related to coils used for embolization of arteries: review of the published evidence. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18 (06) 697-701
15 Uwatoko T, Tsumoto T, Wada N. et al. Dermatitis caused by metal allergy after coil embolization for unruptured cerebral aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (10) e42
16 Shindel AW, Zhu H, Hovsepian DM, Brandes SB. Ureteric embolization with stainless-steel coils for managing refractory lower urinary tract fistula: a 12-year experience. BJU Int 2007; 99 (02) 364-368
17 Chen E, Itkin M. Thoracic duct embolization for chylous leaks. Semin Intervent Radiol 2011; 28 (01) 63-74
18 Gandhoke GS, Pandya YK, Jadhav AP. et al. Cost of coils for intracranial aneurysms: clinical decision analysis for implementation of a capitation model. J Neurosurg 2018; 128 (06) 1792-1798
19 Simon SD, Reig AS, James RF, Reddy P, Mericle RA. Relative cost comparison of embolic materials used for treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2010; 2 (02) 163-167