PDF herunterladen
Klinische Neurophysiologie 2016; 47(02): 103-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104618
Posterpreisträger der DGKN Jahrestagung 2015
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Prognostische Wertigkeit konnektivitätsbasierter Parameter für das motorische Outcome der Handfunktion bei subakuten Schlaganfallpatienten

Connectivity-based Predictions of Hand Motor Outcome for Patients at the Subacute Stage after Stroke
J. Lindow
1   Funktionelle Bildgebung, Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
M. Domin
1   Funktionelle Bildgebung, Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
M. Grothe
2   Institut für Neurologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
U. Horn
1   Funktionelle Bildgebung, Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
S. Eickhoff
3   Institut für Klinische Neurowissenschaften und Medizinische Psychologie, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf
4   Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin, Forschungszentrum Jülich
,
M. Lotze
1   Funktionelle Bildgebung, Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
06. April 2016 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Schlüsselwörter

Diffusion Weighted Imaging - Resting state - Schlaganfall - motorisches Outcome - Rehabilitation

Key words

diffusion weighted imaging - resting state connectivity - recovered hand motor performance - outcome prediction - subacute stroke
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Beebe JA, Lang CE. Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke. Stroke J Cereb Circ 2009; 40: 1772-1779
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Feys H, De Weerdt W, Nuyens G et al. Predicting motor recovery of the upper limb after stroke rehabilitation: value of a clinical examination. Physiother Res Int J Res Clin Phys Ther 2000; 5: 1-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Smania N, Paolucci S, Tinazzi M et al. Active finger extension: a simple movement predicting recovery of arm function in patients with acute stroke. Stroke J Cereb Circ 2007; 38: 1088-1090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL et al. Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology 2010; 74: 280-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Groisser BN, Copen WA, Singhal AB et al. Corticospinal tract diffusion abnormalities early after stroke predict motor outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014; 28: 751-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lindenberg R, Zhu LL, Rüber T et al. Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2012; 33: 1040-1051
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rehme AK, Volz LJ, Feis D-L et al. Identifying Neuroimaging Markers of Motor Disability in Acute Stroke by Machine Learning Techniques. Cereb Cortex N Y N 1991 2015; 25: 3046–3056.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Carter AR, Astafiev SV, Lang CE et al. Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke. Ann Neurol 2010; 67: 365-375
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Park C, Chang WH, Ohn SH et al. Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after stroke. Stroke J Cereb Circ 2011; 42: 1357-1362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lotze M, Beutling W, Loibl M et al. Contralesional motor cortex activation depends on ipsilesional corticospinal tract integrity in well-recovered subcortical stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26: 594-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sotak CH. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury – a review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 561-569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lindow J, Domin M, Grothe M et al. Connectivity-based predictions of hand motor outcome for mildly affected patients at the sub-acute stage after stroke. Frontiers Human Neuroscience 2016; in press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Golestani A-M, Tymchuk S, Demchuk A et al. VISION-2 Study Group. Longitudinal evaluation of resting-state FMRI after acute stroke with hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27: 153-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Laumann TO, Gordon EM, Adeyemo B et al. Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain. Neuron 2015; 87: 657-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ward SH. An update on predicting motor recovery after stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2014; 57: 489-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar