Download PDF
Endoscopy 2016; 48(S 01): E342
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-118164
Cases and Techniques Library (CTL)
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Small-bowel perforation caused by AdvanCE capsule endoscopy delivery device

Marion Simon
1   Department of Gastroenterology, St. Louis Hospital, AP-HP Paris, France
,
Sandrine Barge
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Robert Ballanger Hospital, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France
,
Florence Jeune
3   Department of General, Endocrine and Digestive Surgery, St. Louis Hospital, AP-HP Paris, France
,
Helene Corte
3   Department of General, Endocrine and Digestive Surgery, St. Louis Hospital, AP-HP Paris, France
,
Pierre Cattan
3   Department of General, Endocrine and Digestive Surgery, St. Louis Hospital, AP-HP Paris, France
,
Jean-Marc Gornet
1   Department of Gastroenterology, St. Louis Hospital, AP-HP Paris, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 November 2016 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

We report herein the case of a 58-year-old-woman who was admitted for hematochezia with acute anemia (hemoglobin 9 g/dL). She had a history of small-bowel adenocarcinoma (T3N0M0) complicating celiac disease; this had been treated by a Whipple procedure 12 years previously, with complete remission since then. She was taking anticoagulants following mitral valve replacement with a mechanical valve, with international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 at the time of admission.

Computed tomography (CT) showed no intestinal abnormalities. Upper and lower endoscopies showed normal findings. Small-bowel video capsule endoscopy (VCE) was performed, using the AdvanCE capsule endoscope delivery device (ACEDD; US Endoscopy, Mentor, Ohio, USA) because of the patient’s intestinal loop anatomy. The procedure was carried out without any obvious complication. Of note, the upper endoscopy was done without anesthesia, and poor tolerance led to quick removal of the scope after capsule release.

Several hours later, the patient complained of acute abdominal pain. CT showed a perforation close to the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Laparotomy revealed a small-bowel perforation 10 cm below the anastomosis with the capsule impacted in the mesentery. The VCE reading ([Video 1]) showed an immediate perforation induced by the ACEDD before release of the capsule; this was confirmed by the intraoperative findings ([Video 1]). The outcome was favorable after resection and anastomosis of the perforated area.


Quality:
Small-bowel perforation by the AdvanCE capsule endoscopy delivery device (ACEDD). The capsule endoscopy video shows an immediate perforation below the gastrojejunal anastomosis, caused by the rigid extremity of the ACEDD, with complete stalling of the capsule thereafter. Capsule impaction in the perforated area is confirmed intraoperatively.

The ACEDD was described as safe in a small case series of 16 patients in 2007 by Holden et al. [1]. To our knowledge this is the first case of perforation caused by this device.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AI_2AB

 

  • Reference

  • 1 Holden JP, Dureja P, Pfau PR et al. Endoscopic placement of the small-bowel video capsule by using a capsule endoscope delivery device. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 842-847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar